Author: Ayeza Areej

Marka-e-Haq transformed the May 2025 battlefield into a testing ground, where integrated doctrine and advanced technology redefined the future of aerial warfare. The war provided a paradigmatic example, where a well-integrated air-defence architecture and offensive-defence strategy could successfully counter even the most advanced threats. The unified air-defence architecture of Pakistan transformed numerical disadvantage into strategic superiority, providing crucial lessons on the need to integrate systems and employ multi-domain synergy in the twenty-first century. The May war was more than a fight in the air; it demonstrated that comprehensive planning, innovative technology, and a multi-layered defence can turn the tide in modern war.

India’s recent diplomatic engagement with Israel marks a striking departure from decades of its carefully balanced foreign policy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Israel on February 25 came against the backdrop of intense global scrutiny on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding his government’s actions in Gaza and rising regional tensions. The visit signals a shift away from India’s long-standing neutrality and non-alignment, raising serious questions about the country’s foreign policy independence, strategic autonomy, and moral stance on major global issues. Historically, New Delhi has played a calibrated and neutral role in West Asia. It not only supported Palestinian sovereignty

On 19 January 2026, the three-hour visit of the United Arab Emirates’s (UAE) president, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, to India attracted significant attention due to the potential outcomes it intended to materialise. The visit prospects a deep strategic engagement between the two states across several domains, including defence innovation, industrial development, advanced technology, training, education and counter terrorism.

National Security Strategy (NSS) of United States, released by President Trump, intends to reform the miscalculations of past leaders and improve decades of Washington’s reach. Trump administration, as per the document, promises respect for sovereignty, restraint and renunciation of protracted global involvement. However, upon closer examination, the 33-pager document is full of internal inconsistencies. In contradiction to NSS, which vows to pull back from taking global responsibilities and adopts the policy of non-intervention, the U.S. pressurises other states through economic, military and political coercion.