4. Muhammad Faizan-Rafale Slayer-Mark e Haq-Oped thumbnail-May-2026-APP

The May 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan fundamentally altered the course of modern aerial warfare. From the very onset of the conflict, the superiority of PAF over its adversary became abundantly clear as it in quick succession it shot down seven Indian aircraft without suffering even a single loss. PAF employed J-10Cs fighter aircraft, and the score of 7-Nil became even more striking since four of the downed Indian aircraft were Rafales. These were the same Rafale fighters that were being presented as a hallmark of armed forces modernisation by Indian politicians, military leaders, and analysts. However, the combat loss of Rafale jets to J-10Cs not only shattered the assumptions about technological superiority in the battlefield but also solidified the critical role played by the, strategy, tactics and training in air combat. Yet this cannot be viewed as an isolated incident as it was a direct outcome of the contrasting training, procurement strategy and platform integration by both sides.

India’s Rafale deal became highly politicised and controversial from the very beginning. The deal was first announced in 2012 when Dassault Rafale secured the Indian Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender to supply 126 aircrafts to IAF including partial manufacturing in India by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). Soon after the announcement, reports of disagreements between Indian authorities and Dassault started to emerge over cost of acquisition and warranty for the quality of aircrafts produced by HAL under this deal. In 2016, under BJP, the original deal of 126 jets was replaced by an inter-governmental agreement (IGA) with France for buying 36 fully built jets. In 2017, allegations of corruption, kickbacks and favouritism in the Rafale contract started to surface against the Indian government. A major part of the allegations revolved around the replacement of state-owned HAL by a private entity Reliance Defence, which was owned by a business group close to PM Modi. However, the Indian Supreme Court dismissed all petitions seeking investigation into this matter.

India’s push for acquiring Rafale intensified after the 2019 India-Pakistan conflict, fiasco when the PAF shot down two Indian aircraft and captured an Indian pilot. This debacle also exposed the operational limitations of IAF. In the following days, PM Modi publicly admitted these limitations. Speaking at an event in New Delhi PM Modi stated, “The results [of February 27 misadventure] would have been different if we had Rafale jets.” By 2020, India finally started receiving Rafale jets after a wait of almost eight years. These aircrafts were then formally inducted in IAF. The delivery package of all 36 aircrafts was completed in 2022. Therefore, by May 2025 India-Pakistan conflict, IAF’s Rafale jets were fully operationalised and combat ready.

In contrast, the induction of J-10C by PAF was seamless and swift, especially due to its long-standing collaboration with China since the 60’s. In the following decades, Pakistan-China airpower cooperation further deepened with additional platform acquisitions. The year 1999 marked a turning point in this partnership as Pakistan and China signed a formal agreement to co-develop JF-17 thunder. Thus, PAF’s relationship with China grew from platform acquisition to joint development and induction of platforms. Building on this foundation, Pakistan decided to acquire Chengdu J-10C and inducted them in PAF in March 2022. However, unlike IAF’s acquisition of Rafale, PAF’s transition to J-10Cs was backed by decades of familiarity, joint development and operational trust in Chinese platforms. Accordingly, the aircraft was made combat ready in record time.

Integration of PL-15 long-range Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles also proved to be a critical factor in the operationalization of J-10C as it equipped PAF with a decisive ‘first-shot’ capability in a combat scenario. Thus, a lethal operational ecosystem was adopted by the PAF coupled with the additional network-centric warfare systems. PAF operationalised J-10C within months of their induction. Thus, by May 2025 conflict with India, J-10C was not just operational but deeply embedded into PAF’s doctrine and fully combat-ready.

On the night of 7th May 2025, India decided to launch its unprovoked aggression against Pakistan led by its Rafale jets. This move was made by India in hopes to gain air dominance and to fulfil the political promise made by PM Modi back in 2019. However, the events that followed dealt a decisive blow to Indian aspirations. Within minutes, PAF J-10C fighters, equipped with advance radar systems and PL-15 missiles, engaged and shot down Indian jets beyond visual range. The combat ended with a record 7-Nil scoreline with no losses suffered by the Pakistani side. What made this victory even more astonishing was the fact that four of the downed Indian aircrafts were the Indian Rafale jets.

The global markets reacted sharply to the loss of IAF’s Rafale jets. In the following days of the India-Pakistan aerial clash, the shares of Dassault Aviation plummeted by 10 percent while the shares of Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) surged by 20 percent. Moreover, the long-held assumptions about the superiority of Western platforms were also challenged.  For many developing countries, this episode also raised questions on the worth of high-cost Western platforms in comparison to the cost-effective and integrated systems made by China.

The performance of J-10C was undoubtedly remarkable; however, it would be misleading to attribute the outcome solely to the platform. What truly played a decisive role in the fall of Indian Rafale at the hands of PAF’s J-10C was the professionalism, combat training, skill, and doctrinal clarity of the PAF. One year on, the short and decisive air battle is viewed as a classic example of air power decisiveness in an intense nuclearized environment and is being taught in leading air powers’ study institutes of the world.

Muhammad Faizan Fakhar is a Senior Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.  The article was first pyblished in Global Defense Insight .He can be reached at: [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The West: The History of an Idea

The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.

Read More »

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »