Shah-Carbon capture-Oped thumbnail-Feb-2024-2024-Op 2

Technology and innovation are emerging dimensions of climate discourse in contemporary times. Climate technologies  are rapidly becoming instrumental in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and adapting to the detrimental impacts of climate change. The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) stipulates in Article 4 that all parties shall ‘promote and cooperate in the development, application and diffusion, including transfer of, technologies…that control, reduce or prevent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases.’ In this regard, Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology has the potential to expedite endeavours towards climate change mitigation in environmentally vulnerable countries.  

CCS technology undertakes decarbonisation by capturing carbon emissions released from large-scale fossil-based energy and industry sources provided geological storage is available. The carbon is, subsequently, transported via a network of pipelines for storage underneath the earth. Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (CCUS) is an extension of CCS, involving the recycling of carbon back into economic activity. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and COP28 have also endorsed CCS technology, affirming that decarbonisation efforts can be complemented by mitigation strategies to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. CCS technology has been commercially deployed by approximately 265 projects globally, with around 40 currently in operation. The United States leads the global race in CCS projects, followed by the United Kingdom, Australia, and Norway.

As is often observed, Pakistan is the 8th most vulnerable country to climate change. The devastating floods of 2022 resulted in total loss and damage amounting to approximately PKR 3.3 trillion and PKR 3.2 trillion, respectively. Furthermore, the country’s carbon emissions stand at approximately 234.75 million tonnes. Under the Paris Agreement, Pakistan has pledged to reduce its emissions by half by 2030. Therefore, it is crucial to contextualise the discourse on CCS technology within the national framework and assess its domestic viability.

When it comes to Pakistan, the development of CCS technology is not a convenient undertaking as it comes with certain challenges. First and foremost, this technology continues to be highly costly owing to design complexities coupled with technological and infrastructural requirements. The CCS cost ranges from USD 15 to 130  per metric ton of carbon dioxide. Although the National Climate Change Policy (NCCP) calls for its indigenous development, Pakistan may not be in a fiscally feasible position to undertake CCS projects given its economic straits. In addition, some CCS facilities have been found to be susceptible to underground carbon leakages which could contaminate groundwater and cause other environmental risks.

At present, Pakistan would be well-advised to focus more on adaptation technologies as its share in global emissions is less than 1% while being at the forefront of climate-related threats. Hence, innovations in adaptation domain ought to be prioritised more than those in mitigation. Nonetheless, the feasibility of CCS technology could be possible in future once the country acquires adequate fiscal space to fund such costly projects. The country would also take substantial time to acquire technical expertise and advanced environmental understanding for the establishment of regulatory frameworks in this domain. In the meanwhile, the government could kickstart Research and Development (R&D) in this sector. This would allow the relevant stakeholders to develop technical know-how as well as contextual understanding vis-Ă¡-vis CCS technology. For now, Pakistan should focus more on the design, development and operationalisation of adaptation technologies such as efforts for rainwater harvesting and drip irrigation to enhance water efficiency; developing climate-resilient crops and precision agriculture technologies for sustainable farming; expanding mangrove reforestation and deploying advanced early warning systems for coastal and flood protection; promoting green infrastructure and climate-resilient housing in urban areas; adopting solar energy solutions like solar water heaters and solar pumps; engaging in community-based adaptation projects; and establishing climate-resilient policies and financing mechanisms to support adaptation technologies. Collaboration with the private sector in these areas could also help rejuvenate economic activity, entailing business opportunities and employment prospects for the local population. Pakistan’s mitigation commitments under the Paris Agreement could be materialised through a phased transition to renewable energy, rather than undertaking costly CCS ventures in an economically strained position.

To conclude, the role of climate technologies, in general, and CCS technology, in particular, in addressing environmental issues cannot be overlooked. However, the development of any technology should be based on the contextual and environmental realities of a particular country. Since Pakistan reels from multifaceted environmental threats while contributing quite marginally to global emissions, it ought to focus more on adaptation technologies rather than mitigation ones.

Shah Muhammad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) in Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »