Zahra Niazi-Bucking the Buck-5 July 2024

Daniel McDowell, Bucking the Buck: US Financial Sanctions and the International Backlash against the Dollar (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2023)

Reviewed by Zahra Niazi

Daniel McDowell’s book Bucking the Buck: US Financial Sanctions and the International Backlash against the Dollar is a notable addition to the literature on the de-dollarisation trend and its underlying motives. In it, McDowell critically analyses the influence of the overuse of economic sanctions by the United States (US) on the dollar’s preeminent global status and the future efficacy of sanctions as a foreign policy tool. The book’s central thesis is that ‘US financial sanctions generate political risk, provoke anti-dollar policies among targets, and, in some cases, correlate with de-dollarisation,’ (p. 33).

In the opening chapters, the author reiterates how the dollar’s dominance as the international store of value and a medium of cross-border trade and transactions offers the US the unrivalled capacity to exercise influence against adversaries, including through financial sanctions (pp. 36-7). However, the overuse of sanctions as a tool of economic statecraft has implications for the dollar’s international attractiveness as both a cross-border medium of exchange and a reserve currency.

The ensuing chapters provide empirical evidence to corroborate the interrelation between US sanctions and the anti-dollar policies implemented by the targeted governments (pp. 95-242). By citing Russian and Turkish case studies, the author shows that US financial sanctions can contribute to not just the de-dollarisation of foreign exchange reserves but also a shift in the geographic distribution of financial assets (p. 131). The case study evidence is bolstered further by statistical models showing that gold reserves increase at a higher pace among the countries targeted by sanctions and those at risk of sanctions compared to low-risk or non-sanctioned states. Likewise, an association exists between sanctions and the reduction in foreign holdings of US Treasury bonds. In terms of the dollar’s role in cross-border payments, the author cites examples from Russia, Venezuela, and Turkey to show that sanctions can provoke targeted governments to lessen dependence on the dollar as a payment and trade settlement currency (pp. 184-242). The associated statistical evidence reveals that countries targeted by sanctions or those at risk of sanctions are more likely to reduce their dependence on the dollar as a trade settlement currency. Sanctioned countries also have a higher propensity to sign currency swap agreements, allowing cross-border trade settlement in currencies other than the dollar.

However, the author emphasises that the world is still far from a wholesale migration away from the dollar (p. 284). Reducing reliance on the dollar is not synonymous with decoupling from the currency, and no country can fully ‘sanction proof’ its economy. The dollar remains the ‘king’ of all currencies and will likely continue to hail its dominant status in the coming decades. One of its greatest strengths is the lack of a true rival to it. Beijing has attempted to establish an alternative payment system based on the Renminbi, i.e., the Cross-border Interbank Payment System. However, for this system to be able to insulate the world from Washington’s coercive tools effectively, China will have to disconnect it from the dollar and the existing communication and financial networks, which, McDowell asserts, is challenging (p. 42). Nevertheless, the persistent overuse of financial sanctions by the US could provoke China and the European Union (EU) to design a more robust set of policies to bring about a more significant change in the international monetary system’s competitive landscape. Towards the end of the book, he advises that Washington should consider a long-term view when designing or implementing sanctions policies, as overuse of sanctions can reduce their efficacy (pp. 362-3).

Bucking the Buck effectively answers some of the now frequently asked questions about the dollar’s role in the international trade and monetary system and where it may be headed. However, it would have been preferable had the author, while discussing the dollar’s rivals, deliberated more on the potential challenge to the dollar that the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) bloc could pose. The BRICS nations have an aggregate GDP that surpasses the G7’s (Canada, United States, Japan, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Italy) and account for more than 40 percent of the world population. While accelerated efforts to introduce a new reserve currency by the BRICS took place after the book’s publication at the beginning of 2023, some noteworthy developments occurred in the preceding period. Notably, during the 2022 BRICS Summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin categorically announced that the bloc was working to develop an international reserve currency. Additionally, talks between Riyadh and Beijing to price Saudi oil sales to China in yuan were also actively underway before the book’s publication. Hence, a detailed discussion on the petroyuan as a competitor to the petrodollar and its potential impact on shielding countries from Western sanctions would have been a worthwhile addition to the book.  

McDowell’s pointed critique of the US government’s excessive reliance on sanctions as a diplomatic tool, coupled with his skilful organisation of the book’s content and the use of comprehensive statistical models to support his arguments, make this work both commendable and insightful. The book effectively challenges prevalent assumptions that are often uncritically accepted, such as the rapid decline of the US dollar’s dominance or the immediate readiness of viable alternatives. It provides a nuanced exploration of de-dollarisation and its underlying dynamics, making it an essential read for those seeking a balanced and well-informed perspective on this complex issue.

Zahra Niazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].   


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »