Combatting Urban Flooding through Green Buildings, Streets, and Spaces

The summer monsoon is considered a source of much-awaited relief from the scorching heat, but for some Pakistani urbanites today, it appears to be losing its charm as extreme urban flooding becomes an increasingly common phenomenon. This year, multiple neighbourhoods in the megacity of Lahore became the first target of severe inland flooding during the monsoon as windstorms and heavy downpours hit the city, taking at least 11 innocent lives. With the climate crisis worsening, Pakistan must take rapid and drastic measures to combat the challenge of urban flooding head-on and reduce its impacts on communities.

In recent times, the approach of developing green streets, buildings, and spaces to prevent the worst consequences of urban flooding has gained much traction. ‘Green streets’ can include several elements of blue-green infrastructure (BGI), including vegetative buffer strips and lawns, stormwater planters, tree trenches, stormwater bump-outs, detention and retention tanks, pervious pavements, and gravel trenches to allow water to percolate into the ground. More specifically, vegetative buffer strips are dense growths of vegetation that increase water infiltration and evaporation; stormwater planters are vegetated planters installed in the sidewalk area that have an inlet at the street level and allow stormwater from sidewalks and streets to flow into them; stormwater tree trenches include a series of trees embedded in catchments and linked to an underground infiltration structure; and stormwater bump-outs are vegetated extensions of the street curbs (sidewalk edge) that allow stormwater from streets and sidewalks to flow into them through inlets. Meanwhile, detention tanks include underground systems to store runoff temporarily while retention tanks, on the other hand, permanently store water. Stormwater collected in retention tanks can be recycled for purposes like irrigating gardens or flushing toilets; pervious pavements are paths with a porous surface to allow water to infiltrate through them; and gravel trenches include narrow channels filled with stones to allow stormwater to escape into the subsoil gradually.

Likewise, ‘green buildings’ can include multiple elements of BGI, including green and blue roofs, rainwater harvesting systems, and downspouts. Green roofs consist of a growing medium (like soil) and vegetation over a waterproofing membrane, while blue roofs consist of a flow restriction device to hold water back during the storm event, along with a roof drain to allow the excess water to overflow into it. Additionally, downspouts are vertical pipe attachments for carrying rainwater from a gutter or rooftop to a drain or ground; and rainwater harvesting systems help capture and store rainwater from the rooftop, such as by connecting the vertical pipes from rooftops to storage containers on the ground. Besides green streets and buildings, parks and green spaces, in general, help prevent flooding by stopping stormwater runoff and absorbing or filtering the rainwater. There are myriad benefits to incorporating these solutions, such as the low cost associated with installing them or their ability to perform multiple functions in a spatial area. 

In Pakistan, the importance of green spaces has been increasingly recognised in recent years, and measures have been undertaken to revive the country’s vegetation and conserve the existing protected areas, particularly under the ‘Ten Billion Tree Tsunami Programme.’ The intent of the city and local community managers to enhance the uptake of BGI also appears visible. For instance, the Capital Development Authority (CDA) has mandated that Islamabad residents install rainwater harvesting systems in houses, while the Lahore Development Authority (LDA) requires new high-rise buildings to install green roofs.

Nevertheless, there is still a long way to go until BGI is incorporated widely in Pakistani cities to prevent stormwater runoff, even within formally planned and relatively green neighbourhoods. For instance, what do you see around you if you inhabit or drive across any such neighbourhood? There could be numerous green spaces, but those are not equally distributed across the spatial extent of an area. Although rarely, planters may be seen installed in the sidewalk area, and vegetated bump-outs formed along the street curbs, but without enough thought put into establishing inlets to direct the stormwater from streets into them. You may also see a series of trees planted linearly but not converted into tree trenches as a flooding mitigation strategy. Additionally, limited residential, office and commercial buildings have well-established rainwater harvesting systems or features of green or blue roofs.

A lack of planning and implementation on this front could be attributed to several challenges, such as growing pressures from urbanisation, scarcity of experts, lack of stakeholder coordination, absence of required policies, or insufficient awareness about BGI benefits. Extensive outreach efforts to communicate BGI benefits can stimulate stakeholders’ behavioural change and have the greatest impact in addressing other barriers because ‘where there is a will, there is a way.’ It is also vital that all interventions involving BGI give due attention to the deprived urban communities that suffer the disproportionate impact of flooding by virtue of inhabiting low-lying areas, living in houses made of inexpensive materials, or lacking access to institutional services, among other factors. 

Rethinking how our buildings, streets, and cities are built to combat the adverse effect of urban flooding is an earnest necessity, and the sooner we recognise this, the better.

Zahra Niazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The News International. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »