10. Shaheer Ahmad-Swift Retort-PAF-Oped thumbnail-Feb-2025-AP-1

‘What all could have happened if we had Rafale?’ This statement by India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi surfaced after the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) downed two Indian fighter jets in riposte to the Indian Air Force (IAF)’s failed airstrikes near Balakot on this day in 2019. However, even after receiving the consignment of 36 Rafale combat aircraft, the IAF has been unable to keep pace with regional peer air forces. The retaliatory counterstrike dubbed ‘Operation Swift Retort’ by the PAF demonstrated how a capable air force can turn the tides of battle by employing effective strategy, superior tactics, and advanced technology.

The IAF currently operates an aging fleet of 31 fighter squadrons, unable to meet its sanctioned strength of 42. To plug this numerical gap, India currently harbours an ambitious plan to field 500 fighter jets, most of them indigenously designed and manufactured. For this purpose, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is working on the Indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project and Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).

However, to date, the IAF has struggled to reap the benefits of LCA MK1 and MK2. This is evident in the Indian Air Chief’s statement where he slammed HAL for delayed production of Tejas fighter jets. While 60% of the Tejas fighter MK1 jet is indigenous, its critical components including the GE404 engine are procured from foreign retailers. This casts doubts on the credibility of India’s aircraft manufacturing sector to achieve Modi’s proclaimed goal of ‘Atma Nirbharta’ or self-reliance. Furthermore, the delayed deliveries of the Tejas MK1 and MK2, now expected between 2028 and 2030, risk rendering these aircraft obsolete in the face of fifth-generation combat platforms and emerging manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) systems.

Likewise, sustaining the AMCA project remains a formidable challenge for the IAF due to the absence of a  self-sufficient aerospace ecosystem essential for developing a fifth-generation fighter. The lack of advanced design, development, and manufacturing capabilities, coupled with insufficient expertise in optimising weapons bays and integrating optical and electronic subsystems, presents a significant hurdle. These deficiencies not only heighten the risk of project failure but also threaten to push its induction timeline well beyond 2035. Such technological bottlenecks, prolonged production timelines, and the IAF’s growing demand for advanced fighter jets have placed immense strain on India’s aerospace industry, making the realisation of its self-reliance ambitions increasingly difficult.

In contrast, the PAF swiftly recognised the strategic importance of self-reliance and technological advancement in the aftermath of ‘Swift Retort.’ Capitalising on its first-mover advantage, it has pursued a dual-pronged modernisation strategy, combining advanced procurements with a strong push for indigenisation. As part of this initiative, the PAF has developed and acquired a range of combat aircraft and drones to enhance its operational capabilities. Notable among them are JF-17 Thunder and J-10C Vigorous Dragon. More recently, PAF has green-lighted acquisition of J-31 aircraft—a multirole stealth fifth generation fighter jet—from China which will grant Pakistan a technological edge over its IAF counterparts.

The JF-17 Thunder stands as a testament to Pakistan’s progress in self-reliance. In contrast to LCA’s commencement in 1984, the JF-17 programme was launched in 1998, and currently, more than 150 aircraft are operational. Its recent version Block-III is equipped with state-of-the-art AESA radar, advanced electronic warfare systems, and Beyond-Visual-Range (BVR) weapons.

As part of its commitment to self-reliance in research and development, the PAF has also established a nationwide network of National Aerospace Science & Technology Parks. This cluster serves as a comprehensive ecosystem designed to advance research, design, and innovation in the aviation and aerospace sectors.

Mindful of the growing importance of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in future warfare, the PAF has accelerated induction of advanced UAVs to enhance its operational capabilities. These systems are designed for both kinetic strikes and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. Furthermore, PAF aims to develop AI-based drones that could serve as a loyal wingman to assist manned aircraft in MUM-T capacity.

Since ‘Swift Retort’, the PAF has remained ahead of the curve, rapidly integrating cutting-edge technologies to sustain a psychological and operational edge over the IAF. PAF’s commitment to indigenisation, self-reliance, and strategic partnerships has reinforced a robust defence posture, enabling seamless multi-domain operations. With an evolving arsenal of next-generation fighter jets and unmanned systems, the PAF is not just keeping pace—it is actively shaping the future battlespace. It is fair to say that tea for future IAF pilots remains fantastic.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »