Usman Haider-IndiaAir-MDS

Narendra Modi initiated an ambitious ‘Make in India’ project in 2014 emphasising domestic manufacturing and removing hurdles that prevented foreign collaboration in the defence sector because of the government’s strict foreign investment and joint venture regulations. Since he arrived in Panchavati (the official residential complex of the Indian PM), the indigenisation drive accelerated considerably. India signed various co-production agreements with international aerospace companies including an agreement with General Electric (GE) to co-produce GE-414 engines locally under an 80% Transfer of Technology (ToT); Helicopter Engine MoU with the Safron Group; and the Hermes-900 drone deal with Israeli Elbit Systems. Besides, this, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) – an aerospace and defence company, owned by the Government of India (GoI) opened a new tailor-made facility to augment its helicopter production, alongside inaugurating the first ‘Repair and Overhaul (RAO) facility for Su-30 MKI aircraft, with the capacity to overhaul 20 SU-30 fighters in a single year. HAL claimed to have successfully built an indigenous Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, the Uttam, scheduled to begin manufacturing in 2024. It will be integrated with the Tejas MK-1A after delivering the 40th aircraft. Moreover, HAL will replace the Israeli-manufactured ELM-2052 AESA radars, which were fitted in the early models of the Tejas fighters.

However, is all this buzz created by the Modi government around India’s domestic aircraft manufacturing industry truly justified, or is it merely inflated hype? This article investigates the current capabilities and future prospects of the sector.

Currently, HAL’s production capabilities encompass 20 manufacturing plants and 11 research and development divisions. It is presently manufacturing Tejas Mk-1A combat fighter, Rudra and Dhruv, Prachand and Light Utility helicopters (LUH). It has claimed that in the future, it will manufacture Tejas-Mk-II, Indian Multirole Helicopters (IMRHs) and the Fifth Generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). The government also claims that the company can manufacture 16 Tejas fighters annually.

In reality, only 60% of Tejas MK-1 aircraft components are indigenous, and the remaining, including the engine, are being procured from foreign vendors. The company also claims to have augmented the capability to manufacture 16 Tejas aircraft annually; however, in the ground, till the start of 2023, HAL was manufacturing only eight aircraft a year. The third production line inaugurated in 2023 will function soon, but it seems improbable that the company can achieve the desired target of 24 airframes per annum. The reasons for the shortfall include GE’s existing production capacity being limited to 20 GE-404 engines annually, and the fact that co-production of locally made GE-414 for MK-II will not commence before 2027. Moreover, contrary to the assertions of equipping Tejas with Uttam AESA radar from 2024, it is unlikely that the initial LCA Mk-1A will be equipped with it until 2026.

Moreover, the process of designing, manufacturing, and integrating diverse sensors for a Fifth-Generation aircraft is a challenging endeavour. HAL is the primary entity responsible for the design, development, and manufacture of this aircraft that presently lacks essential research and design abilities to construct an effective stealth aircraft. Similarly, its domestic defence ecosystem is not robust and still far too nascent to meet these expectations. Furthermore, HAL does not have an effective sensor fusion system that can merge data from optical, radar, and infrared sensors on a unified digital display.

The fanfare surrounding India’s co-called venture into Fifth Generation fighter aircraft development is also only just that. Despite the Modi government’s high-profile claims, a wave of skepticism from within its own defence community suggests a reality far removed from official pronouncements. Prominent among the dissenters is Air Marshal Anil Chopra (Retd), who has openly advocated for the procurement of F-35 Fifth-Generation multirole fighters from the US, citing doubts about HAL’s ability to deliver the AMCA within the anticipated timeframe. This perspective is not isolated; the Indian Lok Sabha’s Committee on Defence has also recommended the acquisition of Fifth-Generation fighters from foreign sources to adequately fulfill the operational requirements of the Indian Air Force. These recommendations underscore not just concerns over HAL’s current indigenous capabilities, but also broader issues of product quality and persistent delays in delivery, challenging the narrative of a burgeoning domestic aircraft manufacturing industry.

The above issues indicate significant gaps in India’s indigenous capabilities, raising questions about product quality, delivery timelines, and the overall state of the country’s aircraft manufacturing sector. Currently, India’s aviation industry is relatively equipped only for Fourth-Generation aircraft production, lacking the necessary foundation and expertise for an indigenous Fifth-Generation fighter. This assessment suggests that India’s ambitious claims regarding its aviation prowess require both time and substantial investment to materialise, indicating an endeavour still in its infancy towards achieving the lofty claims being made by its leaders.

Usman Haider is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit:  Mysha Dua Salma


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The West: The History of an Idea

The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.

Read More »

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »