Role Models

It is difficult to understate the importance of role models in the cultivation of superior conduct among ordinary people, and in the mobilization of society towards common goals. A recent seminar by the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS) to commemorate the birthday of Quaid-e-Azam arrived at the very same conclusion after an enriching, lengthy discussion that sought to contextualize the vision of the Quaid in a contemporary light. It was concluded that, through the emulation of exemplars like the Quaid, new generations could engage in the necessary self-improvement that would best reflect their potential and their purpose in carrying forward positive values.

In CASS’s seminar on the Quaid, many audience-members lamented that there was a dearth of good role models to whom the younger generation could turn. It was felt that, for their part, the younger generation faces an onslaught of alluring but ultimately counterproductive messaging through social media and other sources. This observation is not novel per se, since one used to criticize MySpace for the same reason two decades ago, MTV two decades before that, and so on.

However, the notion that good role models are absent from our present-day milieu is a viscerally-felt observation. Our political class continues its infighting, our bureaucratic structures are mired in inertia, and most spheres are rife with nepotism and mediocrity. There is thus a pressing need for strong positive role models to exemplify superior values among generations, and such inculcation has not just long-term but also very immediate effects.

A recent study by Emma Riley in the Review of Economics and Statistics on the importance of role models illustrates this elegantly. She segregated two groups of schoolchildren in Uganda, one of which watched the inspirational movie Queen of Katwe, while the other acted as a control group. The Queen of Katwe portrays Phiona Mutesi, a young Ugandan girl of few means but who, through intense personal effort and dedication, rises to become a world chess prodigy that successfully competes in international chess tournaments, despite her humble means and the lack of an enabling or encouraging environment. In Riley’s experiment, exposure to the inspiring film before taking a difficult national-level  exam found statistically significant results.

According to Riley’s findings, students who watched the film before taking the national exam were found to perform better, especially in maths subjects, and the largest effect for female students. Children in the experimental group, which viewed the film, saw a simultaneously inspiring and realistic role model in Phiona Mutesi, and just watching a movie with a good role model could exert a positive and immediate influence on young people, in terms of better grades on a test. Given the robust indications of such improvements on youth, should we not seek to highlight the work of good role models for our young generation?

It is worth noting that there are a great many persons of noble character, both in Pakistan and around the world, who work tirelessly and impressively, but do so unnoticed by society. In this country, they work in a relative seclusion from the media’s attention or the public’s gaze, and they also span a wide range of fields, including: medicine, IT, telecom, defense, engineering, law, public security, diplomacy, education, social services, environment, scientific research, construction, and many more. Because of their comparative remoteness from the public square, younger generations are not benefiting from the aura of these exemplars, at least not at a sufficient scale.

But why do the profiles of such people not garner as much attention? Perhaps it is because they are not controversial, and media narratives thrive on controversy. It is also perhaps because they are not attention-seekers themselves, finding more value in quiet but gratifying personal effort. It may also be because, as has been the trend elsewhere in the world, negativity espouses more public response, and such people shun negativity in their pursuit of higher attainments. They are thus not as prominent in the public eye, but they would, no doubt, serve as better role models for the youth than what social media algorithms and mainstream media coverage are seeking to offer.

Commemorating the legacy of Quaid-e-Azam offers us an opportunity to pay homage to a man of deep introspection, vision, integrity, and commitment. We owe him a debt that we cannot directly pay. But by disseminating the achievements of positive role models to our youth, we can indirectly repay our debt to the Quaid, in fostering a more excellent generation to blossom ahead.

Dr Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »