Role Models

It is difficult to understate the importance of role models in the cultivation of superior conduct among ordinary people, and in the mobilization of society towards common goals. A recent seminar by the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS) to commemorate the birthday of Quaid-e-Azam arrived at the very same conclusion after an enriching, lengthy discussion that sought to contextualize the vision of the Quaid in a contemporary light. It was concluded that, through the emulation of exemplars like the Quaid, new generations could engage in the necessary self-improvement that would best reflect their potential and their purpose in carrying forward positive values.

In CASS’s seminar on the Quaid, many audience-members lamented that there was a dearth of good role models to whom the younger generation could turn. It was felt that, for their part, the younger generation faces an onslaught of alluring but ultimately counterproductive messaging through social media and other sources. This observation is not novel per se, since one used to criticize MySpace for the same reason two decades ago, MTV two decades before that, and so on.

However, the notion that good role models are absent from our present-day milieu is a viscerally-felt observation. Our political class continues its infighting, our bureaucratic structures are mired in inertia, and most spheres are rife with nepotism and mediocrity. There is thus a pressing need for strong positive role models to exemplify superior values among generations, and such inculcation has not just long-term but also very immediate effects.

A recent study by Emma Riley in the Review of Economics and Statistics on the importance of role models illustrates this elegantly. She segregated two groups of schoolchildren in Uganda, one of which watched the inspirational movie Queen of Katwe, while the other acted as a control group. The Queen of Katwe portrays Phiona Mutesi, a young Ugandan girl of few means but who, through intense personal effort and dedication, rises to become a world chess prodigy that successfully competes in international chess tournaments, despite her humble means and the lack of an enabling or encouraging environment. In Riley’s experiment, exposure to the inspiring film before taking a difficult national-level  exam found statistically significant results.

According to Riley’s findings, students who watched the film before taking the national exam were found to perform better, especially in maths subjects, and the largest effect for female students. Children in the experimental group, which viewed the film, saw a simultaneously inspiring and realistic role model in Phiona Mutesi, and just watching a movie with a good role model could exert a positive and immediate influence on young people, in terms of better grades on a test. Given the robust indications of such improvements on youth, should we not seek to highlight the work of good role models for our young generation?

It is worth noting that there are a great many persons of noble character, both in Pakistan and around the world, who work tirelessly and impressively, but do so unnoticed by society. In this country, they work in a relative seclusion from the media’s attention or the public’s gaze, and they also span a wide range of fields, including: medicine, IT, telecom, defense, engineering, law, public security, diplomacy, education, social services, environment, scientific research, construction, and many more. Because of their comparative remoteness from the public square, younger generations are not benefiting from the aura of these exemplars, at least not at a sufficient scale.

But why do the profiles of such people not garner as much attention? Perhaps it is because they are not controversial, and media narratives thrive on controversy. It is also perhaps because they are not attention-seekers themselves, finding more value in quiet but gratifying personal effort. It may also be because, as has been the trend elsewhere in the world, negativity espouses more public response, and such people shun negativity in their pursuit of higher attainments. They are thus not as prominent in the public eye, but they would, no doubt, serve as better role models for the youth than what social media algorithms and mainstream media coverage are seeking to offer.

Commemorating the legacy of Quaid-e-Azam offers us an opportunity to pay homage to a man of deep introspection, vision, integrity, and commitment. We owe him a debt that we cannot directly pay. But by disseminating the achievements of positive role models to our youth, we can indirectly repay our debt to the Quaid, in fostering a more excellent generation to blossom ahead.

Dr Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »