Haris Bilal-BJP-MDS

With the Lok Sabha elections around the corner in 2024, the debate around Indian electoral dynamics has attracted significant discourse. According to some estimates, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is likely to win the elections for a third consecutive term. However, the concerning matter is that BJP’s election campaign which should ideally be based on a vision of India’s future outlook; unfortunately revolves around exploiting anti-Pakistan sentiments. While the BJP might win the upcoming elections, its current anti-Pakistan campaign could jeopardise regional peace and stability.

Experts in Pakistan, particularly, those who have served in India and understand BJP’s mindset believe that it is likely that BJP’s election campaign, would again be based on the same pattern – blaming Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi continues to accuse Pakistan of supporting terrorism for electoral gains. Moreover, during an electoral rally, he went to the extent of alleging that India had been living under terrorism for the past 40 years for which Pakistan was responsible. He suggested punishing Pakistan by saying that  India would ‘hit them hard at home’. Unfortunately, this kind of narrative has become a very popular slogan to get the desired political gains and is likely to become an important factor in BJP’s election campaign. 

Reflecting on the 2019 elections, it’s evident that this narrative benefitted the BJP, allowing them to attain their political objectives by leveraging anti-Pakistan sentiments. In this regard, nuclear signalling by the BJP’s leaders, particularly Mr Modi, was quite evident during the election campaign. The BJP brought the nuclear debate from strategic circles to political gatherings and manipulated public sentiments with slogans like ‘Qatal Ki Raat’. Though, this resulted in a landslide victory for the BJP; the victory came at the cost of jeopardising regional peace and stability.

The persistent reliance of the BJP on propagating unwanted criticism on Pakistan for electoral gains would have implications at both domestic, regional, and international levels. While at the domestic level, it might get firm support within the masses since it diverts attention away from pressing domestic issues like economic disparities and social welfare issues. At the regional level, this approach hinders prospects of constructive engagement between India and Pakistan on issues related to peace dialogue, trade, and regional cooperation, which are vital for long-lasting stability in South Asia. BJP’s aggressive and hegemonic designs have cultivated anti-India sentiments in the neighbouring countries. For instance, when the mural titled ‘Akhand Bharat’ (Undivided India) was revealed at the new building of the Indian Parliament earlier this year, it raised concerns from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal as a map of India was presented whose boundaries include most of present day South Asia. This move clearly shows the hegemonic aspirations of the BJP. At the international level, such tactics are also likely to have implications for Pakistan. For instance, Pakistan’s image at the international level is portrayed as a country harbouring terrorism in turn undermining the state’s credibility as a responsible nation. India’s excessive use of such a biased narrative could exacerbate cross-border tensions also with New Delhi itching to attempt another misadventure on the lines of February 2019.

Apart from the anti-Pakistan narrative, the BJP is also likely to exploit the ‘Hindutva’ factor extensively in the forthcoming elections. The BJP has effectively used Hindutva and anti-Pakistan sentiments to divert attention from governance challenges, and they might employ this strategy again.

Under Mr Modi’s leadership, the BJP must move beyond relying on anti-Pakistan slogans for short-term political gains. Instead, there’s an urgent need to formulate policies that address the pressing issues of minority rights, particularly concerning Muslims. The BJP’s divergence from Nehru’s inclusive ideology, embracing a Hindutva-centric narrative, has not only alienated a significant portion of the minority vote but also led to extreme policy decisions. These decisions, such as the Citizenship Amendment Act and the annexation of Jammu and Kashmir, have not only driven a wedge between the BJP and the Muslim community but have also intensified tensions with neighbouring Pakistan.

By revisiting and rectifying these policies, the BJP has an opportunity not only to re-engage its lost vote bank but also to address Pakistan’s concerns. Such a proactive approach could enhance Indo-Pak relations and pave the way for resolving long-standing bilateral issues. By taking these steps, India can position itself as a responsible nation, ensuring a brighter and more stable future for the entire South Asian region.

Haris Bilal Malik is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »