Beyond Fiction: Reimagining Modern Combat with Laser Weapons

‘It was sweeping round swiftly and steadily, this flaming death, this invisible, inevitable sword of heat.’ When these words by H.G. Wells appeared in his canonical War of the Worlds, laser weapons were nothing but a charming allure for science fiction geeks and conspiracy theorists. Nevertheless, significant strides in swarm drones flicking through skies and momentous breakthroughs in Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs), led strategic corridors to overtly clamour for this ‘inevitable sword of heat’ as a future weapon of choice.

Since their advent, laser weapons have changed the risk calculus in modern warfare. Stand alone or in conjunction with mainstream armament, these optical blazes can ably engage targets moving with breakneck speeds and damage or perforate a target’s structure with pinpoint accuracy.

Due to their lethality, militaries across the globe are pouring investments to shore up their laser capabilities. Having extensive experience in R&D of laser weapons since 1970, the United States is developing multiple laser apparatuses to undertake numerous military tasks including air defence, counter-drone measures and sheltering ground forces. The system known as Palletised High-Energy Laser (P-HEL) – the first DEW deployment for air defence – is positioned in the Middle East to shield American troops and maritime merchandise from Houthi potshots and hostile drones in the Red Sea. Reciprocally, Russia’s investments in laser weapons can be seen in fielding counter-drone and anti-satellite weapons: Kalina, Zadira, Peresvet and Sokol Eshelon, to name a few.  Whereas, China is also taking sizable steps to out-innovate its counterparts in laser technology. Even if overstated, it has reportedly developed a laser capable of penetrating the ‘black barrier’ surrounding a hypersonic projectile. PLA scientists also claim that they have hit a significant breakthrough by developing laser cooling technology that, consequently facilitates incessant bombardment of the photon beam. 

Besides battlefield prudence, laser weapons are a resource-conscious defence solution for modern militaries. Rather than draining costly ordnance, such as USD 2.1 million Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) and USD 2.0 million Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile, at a negligible-priced drone, a laser weapon can intercept these assets with precision and a trifling cost (USD 10 per shot).  Moreover, unlike kinetic projectiles which carry a sizeable risk of collateral damage, laser weapons are insusceptible to such risks, as they can be absorbed or scattered in the atmosphere if they miss the target. These factors make laser weapons a viable solution to counter unmanned agents, target incoming projectiles, and potentially blind enemy satellites.

Analogous to other combat systems, laser weapons are not devoid of risks and challenges. A key challenge surrounding these weapons is provision of uninterrupted power to meticulously hit targets at long ranges. While laser beams need continuous power supplies, it also spawns an ample sum of heat surplus that requires a formidable sinking mechanism. In addition, these technologies require clear target sighting, stable platform and constant pointing of beam over rapidly maneuvering targets which is akin to hitting a dartboard while standing on a balance board. Concurrently, atmospheric factors including water droplets, fog and the globe’s curvature also degrade effectiveness of photon beams.

Other than technical complications, belligerent forces have ample room to overwhelm laser systems by forcing them to deal with different threat vectors simultaneously. This may strain the platform’s agility and precision to engage and hit multiple targets. Meanwhile, while considerable modernisation is done in super capacitor technologies which enable the laser weapons to fire charges without power degradation, generating and emitting ceaseless energy barrages in austere battle conditions remains a challenging task.

However, such associated pitfalls could be addressed through actionable approaches. Miniaturising the power supply mechanism for ground-based laser systems will allow their installation on agile armoured personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles. Relatedly, managing waste heat surplus by installing thermal storage management could improve their  performance. In addition, holistically pairing laser shafts in conjunction with conventional armaments including counter drone technologies, gatling guns, mortars, and missile systems would make them an ancillary layer of defence, allowing reservation of advanced surface-to-air missiles for more pressing threats such as cruise and ballistic missiles. Countries having an amalgam of kinetic and non-kinetic weapons will have battlefield edge over those who have not. 

Penetration of technology in every nook and cranny of modern warfare make laser weapons a go-to weapon in modern warfare. Unlike other ambitious projects like electromagnetic rail guns, laser weapons are not destined to be relegated to the R&D graveyard. From what has been  observed in recent deployments of these weapons for air defence, anti-satellite and counter-drone purposes, laser weapons will be a lynchpin in modern military strategies. Given longer range, miniature logistical imprints and ‘infinite ammo,’ these photon cascades will provide militaries with peerless battlefield capabilities.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »