laser weapons

The Israeli Defense Ministry confirmed that it successfully tested its laser air defence system in mid-April of this year. According to the Ministry’s research and development team, the Iron Beam accurately intercepted several targets, including a rocket, a mortar and a drone from different ranges and at different times. The system will be deployed within the year. The laser air defence system aims to cater to the shortage of interceptor missiles for Israel’s air defence systems to shoot incoming targets.

In addition to that, the United States Navy also reportedly carried out a successful test of its Laser Layered Defense (LLD) in February 2022. According to official sources, the High Energy Laser (HEL) weapon system successfully intercepted a simulated subsonic cruise missile in flight and neutralised other threats during the White Sands test. According to the US Chief of Naval Research, ‘innovative laser systems like the LLD have the potential to redefine the future of naval combat operations.’

With evolving security challenges, countries are moving towards technologies that are non-kinetic in nature and are able to inflict maximum damage to the adversary, Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) are one of them. As they operate with varying intensities of light and electromagnetic spectrum, their resulting effects can range from lethal to non-lethal. Two main types of DE weapons include high-powered microwaves and high energy lasers.

The laser, as a weapon, has wide military applications. Electric lasers can be used to shoot down or disable aerial targets such as rockets, small drones, aircraft, and cruise missiles. As a target designator and range finder, the laser can effectively hit the target first and then shoot it down with pinpoint precision. This could be useful in keeping the casualty level minimum during war time. Laser guns can also be used for disorienting a subject during combat. Optical lasers are used for blinding effect in dispersing crowds etc. As defensive countermeasures, airborne laser systems are used to find, track and intercept Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) as well.

Laser defence systems are unique due to their ability to track and intercept aerial targets. With increasing aerial threats, laser systems are proving to be better interceptors than traditional air defence systems. It is observed that even a weak laser system can disable a target with exact accuracy without being tracked. Countries are now spending huge amounts of their defence and R&D budget to develop the stealth technology to avoid detection or getting hit by such systems.  In this regard, anti-missile lasers can be used to avoid incoming missiles. A laser can also provide defence against swarm drones and unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles to protect forward-deployed troops, bases and infrastructure near border areas.

DE weapons could also play a key role in defending against the world’s fastest missile technology, i.e., hypersonic missiles. These missiles are matchless in their character due to high speed – more than five times the speed of sound and maneuverability, and so far, no defence against them seems to be working. DEWs could also be deployed on space-based platforms and since they operate at the speed of light, they will be able to intercept hypersonic missiles and make tracking of these missiles easy. The HEL can engage a hypersonic glide vehicle, say travelling at Mach 25, at around 35000 times its speed, during its boost phase.

Due to their low cost, precision targeting, stealth-like capabilities, easy mobility and platform friendly characteristic, air, land, sea and space laser weapons are becoming a priority for countries as they fulfil their defence needs and are cheap as well. Even India has added DEWs development to its priority list immediately after hypersonic weapons. For countries like Pakistan, it is high time to invest in such technologies to address future challenges in the region. After the recent accidental missile launch episode by India, Pakistan must develop options in kinetic and non-kinetic domains to deal with such a scenario in future. Similarly, laser weapons can also be used in border management across the Line of Control (LoC) to avoid casualties of military personnel.

With the introduction of emerging technologies, the spectrum of threats on the battlefield has also widened and countries having both kinetic and non-kinetic options will be in an advantageous position over those who do not. Laser weapon systems are one such critical option.

Etfa Khurshid Mirza is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. Her area of interest is warfare and emerging technologies. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »