Ajwa Hijazi-Amp-Sup-Kash-Oped thumbnail-Aug-2024- AP

Fifth August 2024 marks half a decade since India annexed the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and denied the disputed territory’s right to statehood through a rushed presidential decree. Months after winning the second term in the Lok Sabha polls 2019, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government revoked Article 370 of the Indian constitution on 5th August, which granted IIOJK special status. They divided it into two unions, Jammu and Kashmir, to have its separate assembly; and Ladakh, to be governed directly by New Delhi.

With revocation of Article 370, its provision of Article 35A (added to Article 370 in 1954) was also automatically scrapped. These articles extended considerable autonomy to the region to make laws except those related to defence, foreign policy, and finance. Moreover, Article 35A forbade outsiders from buying land, holding local government jobs, and seeking permanent residence. However, over the years, these constitutional provisions were diluted so much that the move to scrape them five years ago only lifted the pretence of autonomy and formalised India’s colonisation of IIOJK.

For over seven decades, the people of IIOJK have been subjected to India’s brutality in almost every aspect of their lives. However, post-2019 saw a renewed phase of suppression. There has been an amplification of the military siege along with continuation of brazen human rights violations by the Indian Army. Since abrogation of Article 370, the Indian security forces have killed 887 Kashmiris, tortured 2,430 people, made 24,688  arrests, and sexually assaulted 133 women.

Besides the use of security forces to dehumanise Kashmiris, BJP has also taken various demographic, administrative, and electoral measures to further disenfranchise the Muslim identity of occupied Kashmir. Taking inspiration from the Israeli model of illegal settlements in Palestine, the BJP has been working on altering the demography of the region by planning to turn the Muslim majority into a minority. Under the new domicile law (2020), the government issued more than 3.5 million domiciles to outsiders, establishing illegal non-Kashmiri colonies. These non-residents were also granted voting rights.

In 2022, the Indian government seized properties of the J&K Waqf Board (the administrative body responsible for managing the functioning of Muslim institutions/places of worship). In its bid to erase the religious identity of Muslims in the occupied territory, they took control of significant religious shrines, arrested prominent Islamic scholars, and barred prayers in various mosques.

Additionally, in May 2022, the Indian Delimitation Commission gave a delimitation plan for new electoral constituencies in IIOJK. In this plan, Jammu was given six more seats in the J&K assembly, while Kashmir was given one more seat, even though (as per the 2011 census) Jammu had a population of 5.3 million compared to 7 million in Kashmir. The deliberate disregard of Muslim majority areas to impact the electoral landscape indicates BJP’s aim of disempowering Muslims.

Furthermore, as per the Indian Supreme Court, the Election Commission is supposed to hold Legislative Assembly Elections in the region by 30 September 2024. However, given the result of the recent Lok Sabha elections (first since abrogation of Article 370), it is yet to be seen if BJP will hold these elections. The party faced resentment from the people of IIOJK, as evidenced by an overwhelming voter turnout. For many years, most residents of Indian-occupied Jammu & Kashmir had boycotted elections, viewing them as attempts by New Delhi to legitimise its control over a region. However, this trend shifted as India conducted its national elections. Voters and local politicians assert that this was not an endorsement of India or its policies. Rather, they argue it reflected a significantly altered political landscape in the region, leaving them with no other option to express their dissent against New Delhi. Wary of the rejection from the public, the BJPdid not field candidates in Kashmir, and even its proxies were firmly rejected by the voters.

BJP and Narendra Modi have been trying to mask their intensified atrocities through a forced narrative of normalcy and development in one of the world’s most militarised regions by propagating that after removing the so-claimed ‘barrier of Article 370’, political and economic progress has returned to the occupied territory. Indian mainstream media continue to play a pivotal role in furthering the government’s disingenuous version of the situation. Likewise, the flow of information from the ground has been suppressed through draconian measures. Local Kashmiri journalists face intimidation, surveillance, and arrests by the security forces, along with the use of fear-inducing legislation, e.g., the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), to stifle any voices of dissent in IIOJK.

Over the past five years, the Indian government has intensified its oppressive actions in IIOJK. Despite this, the people of the occupied territory, continuing a legacy of over seven decades, have remained steadfast in their struggle for freedom. On this 5th August, Pakistanis stand resolutely with their Kashmiri brethren, exposing Indian atrocities and reaffirming unwavering support for their right to self-determination, as enshrined in United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions. However, the United Nations and the international community need to stop turning a blind eye to the continued Indian human rights violations in occupied Jammu & Kashmir. They must stand unequivocally with the Kashmiri people in their struggle for self-determination, as mandated by UNSC resolutions, and hold India accountable for its systematic efforts to erase Muslim identity from the religious, demographic, cultural, and political spheres of IIOJK.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].

Image Inspiration: Altaf Hussain Wani


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »