IIOJK

Under normal circumstances, compasses point towards a fixed point geographically situated on the globe called ‘True North’. However, if another magnetic field creates an interference large enough, the compass shows a magnetic north instead. If the compass-holder is unaware of this phenomenon, they may mistake it for ‘True North’. Similarly, the hype around India’s G20 presidency is creating an illusion large enough to overshadow more serious matters. The moral compasses must be recalibrated to correct this deviation, lest it be be mistaken for direction. Even if lies are repeated so often in hopes they become the truth, the onus lies on global leaders to know whom they are doing business with and at what cost.

India is propounding its economic prowess with a disingenuous narrative about the disputed region of Jammu & Kashmir. The 3rd Tourism Working Group meeting scheduled on 22-24 May in Srinagar attempts to project so-called normalcy in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K). The theme Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam translates to ‘One Earth, One Family, One Future,’ and the Lotus symbol seemingly represents the seven continents and the seven seas but duplicitously excludes Kashmiris’ plight.

IIOJK is not safe – it is occupied. It is under an onslaught of epic proportions where the region is ironically safe for tourists but not for its own indigenous population. Indian propaganda deliberately suppresses the underlying realities that have driven decades of occupation.

Behind the Fancy Curtain

IIOJK is being Indianised in a number of ways. The beautification of the host city before the Summit is happening at a pace almost as fast as the accelerated dispossession and quashing of resistance. This distraction, driven in part by the Smart City initiative, is also endangering its cultural heritage, with settler-colonial ambitions aggravating the increase in demand for land.

Ever since abrogation of Article 370 and 35A that fractured Jammu & Kashmir, non-locals can be hired for government jobs which were earlier reserved for locals only – a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949, which explicitly states that ‘the occupying power shall not transfer parts of the civilian population into the territory it occupies’. Not only do the legal changes accommodate settlers, but they do so by removing locals from their homes and refusing to extend leases of local hoteliers. Moreover, when the category of domicile is expanded to include Indian soldiers, oppressors become neighbours.

Under the guise of development, business licenses are callously handed to Indian companies taking livelihoods away from Kashmiris. For example, in December 2019, mining contracts were auctioned online during an Internet blackout in the occupied territory. 70% of the tenders for mineral extraction and all ten mining blocks in Srinagar went to non-local contractors. At the Dubai Expo in 2022, IIOJK was projected as a lucrative ‘Jammu and Kashmir Union Territory’ to attract investment.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)has even attempted to create a database of unique alpha-numeric codes of Family IDs to identify Kashmiris – which could conveniently be used to tighten surveillance of civilians. All these factors are only part of the chokehold that has tightened over 75 years of occupation. In 2019, 50, 000 military and para-military personnel joined the 700,000 already stationed there, and in January of this year, the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs announced it would deploy 18 more Central Reserve Police Force.

Call for International Action

India must be held accountable, and soon, for the human rights violations and for recruiting a settler class to dispossess indigenous Kashmiris. With IIOJK stripped of its autonomy and deliberate demographic changes, any plebiscite, as required by the earliest UN Resolutions on Kashmir, would be neither fair nor impartial.

So, as suited men walk into big conference rooms to be seated in comfortable chairs for the G20 Summit, the dispossessed Kashmiris will wonder if their plight is on the agenda, if the political, social, and economic perils will be part of the discussions. Would the ‘leaders’ remember the unsettling experiences of COVID-19 lockdowns and realise that IIOJK had known lockdowns before any pandemic ever came? Would it matter that the so-called ‘economic giant’ is projecting normalcy in one of the world’s most militarised regions? Is it fitting for leaders to overlook human rights violations for profit, especially when a fascist regime is tactfully suppressing victims’ voices? Would they recalibrate their moral compass?

Human well-being has often been brushed aside by people in power who think of themselves as ‘practical’ – a grave oversight. However, the world cannot know peace unless international forums and leaders with legitimacy take responsibility for humanitarian causes instead of treating economic development and human well-being as separate pursuits.

As the guardians of global economic progress, G20 leaders bear a solemn responsibility to uphold the values of human dignity and justice. It would be a grave dishonour to turn a blind eye to the unspeakable human rights abuses being perpetrated in occupied Jammu & Kashmir, simply for the sake of commercial gain. Behind the veil of geopolitical expediency lies a forgotten people whose cries for freedom and dignity echo across the mountains and valleys of this beautiful land. Let us not forget the plight of Kashmiris, who have suffered for far too long under the weight of occupation and oppression. It is time for the world to stand up and take notice, and for the leaders of the G20 to rise to the challenge of defending the fundamental rights of all people, regardless of their nationality or religion.

Bakhtawar Iftikhar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be contacted at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The West: The History of an Idea

The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.

Read More »

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »