Haris Bilal-BJP-MDS

With the Lok Sabha elections around the corner in 2024, the debate around Indian electoral dynamics has attracted significant discourse. According to some estimates, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is likely to win the elections for a third consecutive term. However, the concerning matter is that BJP’s election campaign which should ideally be based on a vision of India’s future outlook; unfortunately revolves around exploiting anti-Pakistan sentiments. While the BJP might win the upcoming elections, its current anti-Pakistan campaign could jeopardise regional peace and stability.

Experts in Pakistan, particularly, those who have served in India and understand BJP’s mindset believe that it is likely that BJP’s election campaign, would again be based on the same pattern – blaming Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi continues to accuse Pakistan of supporting terrorism for electoral gains. Moreover, during an electoral rally, he went to the extent of alleging that India had been living under terrorism for the past 40 years for which Pakistan was responsible. He suggested punishing Pakistan by saying that  India would ‘hit them hard at home’. Unfortunately, this kind of narrative has become a very popular slogan to get the desired political gains and is likely to become an important factor in BJP’s election campaign. 

Reflecting on the 2019 elections, it’s evident that this narrative benefitted the BJP, allowing them to attain their political objectives by leveraging anti-Pakistan sentiments. In this regard, nuclear signalling by the BJP’s leaders, particularly Mr Modi, was quite evident during the election campaign. The BJP brought the nuclear debate from strategic circles to political gatherings and manipulated public sentiments with slogans like ‘Qatal Ki Raat’. Though, this resulted in a landslide victory for the BJP; the victory came at the cost of jeopardising regional peace and stability.

The persistent reliance of the BJP on propagating unwanted criticism on Pakistan for electoral gains would have implications at both domestic, regional, and international levels. While at the domestic level, it might get firm support within the masses since it diverts attention away from pressing domestic issues like economic disparities and social welfare issues. At the regional level, this approach hinders prospects of constructive engagement between India and Pakistan on issues related to peace dialogue, trade, and regional cooperation, which are vital for long-lasting stability in South Asia. BJP’s aggressive and hegemonic designs have cultivated anti-India sentiments in the neighbouring countries. For instance, when the mural titled ‘Akhand Bharat’ (Undivided India) was revealed at the new building of the Indian Parliament earlier this year, it raised concerns from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal as a map of India was presented whose boundaries include most of present day South Asia. This move clearly shows the hegemonic aspirations of the BJP. At the international level, such tactics are also likely to have implications for Pakistan. For instance, Pakistan’s image at the international level is portrayed as a country harbouring terrorism in turn undermining the state’s credibility as a responsible nation. India’s excessive use of such a biased narrative could exacerbate cross-border tensions also with New Delhi itching to attempt another misadventure on the lines of February 2019.

Apart from the anti-Pakistan narrative, the BJP is also likely to exploit the ‘Hindutva’ factor extensively in the forthcoming elections. The BJP has effectively used Hindutva and anti-Pakistan sentiments to divert attention from governance challenges, and they might employ this strategy again.

Under Mr Modi’s leadership, the BJP must move beyond relying on anti-Pakistan slogans for short-term political gains. Instead, there’s an urgent need to formulate policies that address the pressing issues of minority rights, particularly concerning Muslims. The BJP’s divergence from Nehru’s inclusive ideology, embracing a Hindutva-centric narrative, has not only alienated a significant portion of the minority vote but also led to extreme policy decisions. These decisions, such as the Citizenship Amendment Act and the annexation of Jammu and Kashmir, have not only driven a wedge between the BJP and the Muslim community but have also intensified tensions with neighbouring Pakistan.

By revisiting and rectifying these policies, the BJP has an opportunity not only to re-engage its lost vote bank but also to address Pakistan’s concerns. Such a proactive approach could enhance Indo-Pak relations and pave the way for resolving long-standing bilateral issues. By taking these steps, India can position itself as a responsible nation, ensuring a brighter and more stable future for the entire South Asian region.

Haris Bilal Malik is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »