Shaza Arif-SouthAsia-Hybrid Peace-9 May 2022-ORI

Book Review

Zia Ul Haque Shamsi, South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace (New York: Peter Lang Publishing Group, 2021)

Reviewed by Shaza Arif

The South Asian region has been marred by turbulence and instability. The perpetual Indo-Pak rivalry, presence of nuclear weapons, and persistent instability in Afghanistan have further exacerbated existing tensions. The book South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace is a recent take on regional dynamics authored by Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi.

In 98 pages, the author draws attention to the importance of maintaining peace in South Asia, vis-à-vis Indo-Pak relations and proposes various mechanisms in this regard. The book comprises three parts. In the first chapter, the author briefly discusses Indo-Pak rivalry. He underscores the importance and need of harnessing hybrid peace between the arch-rivals. the author refers to hybrid peace as observance of mutual respect, productive engagement, accommodation for views, adjustment for religio-cultural leanings, space for common interests and urge for peaceful coexistence (p. 4). To meet these ends, he proposes constructive engagement, conflict resolution, economic cooperation, information sharing, and sociocultural cooperation. The second chapter is focused on peace and stability in Afghanistan. Dr Shamsi comprehensively highlights the significance of Afghanistan in the region. He suggests that the regional players should collectively play their due role in lifting Afghanistan for the development of the region itself. In the last chapter of the book, the author explores the potential role of South Asian Association for Regional Co-operation (SAARC) in promoting hybrid peace in South Asia. He lists various areas where SAARC can act as an effective platform for the betterment of the region.

Traditionally, there is more focus on hybrid war in South Asian literature, given the entrenched complexities of the region. Conversely, Dr Shamsi has advocated for nurturing hybrid peace in South Asia. The book is an interesting read to understand the bitter regional realities. He aptly confers that the enduring Indo-Pak rivalry has taken the largest toll on peace and prosperity of the individuals living in both states. The assertions made are backed by figures which strengthen the given arguments. The core strength of the book is that it has offered a new perspective and approach for India and Pakistan to recalibrate their existing perceptions, resume bilateral relations and lessen previous hostilities for their own good. In a very engaging style, it has been emphasised that the two states need to learn to live with multiple disputes rather than being bent on resolving each and every one of them.

With the current deadlock existing between the two states, the book is a timely contribution.  It is concise yet rich in content. It is easy to read given that it is well-structured, uses simple vocabulary, and is devoid of unnecessary details. It is very encouraging to read a viewpoint that offers a new approach for the arch-rivals. In terms of policymaking, this book provides valuable insights for the leadership of both countries. It demands that it is high time that a hybrid approach is employed to restore confidence and rebuild relations that are mutually beneficial and sustainable. These steps will benefit people rather than the interests of any particular segment.

The concept given by the author needs to be promoted at the highest levels. However, one limitation of the book is that the recommendations are viable provided the stakeholders are convinced to execute the required decisions as stated by the author himself. The mentioned recommendations demand bold and meaningful diplomacy by leadership from both sides. The fact remains that Indian leadership is too reluctant to engage with Pakistan. Although Pakistan has tried to reach out to India multiple times, the gesture has not been reciprocated. The main reason for such arrogance is the strong foothold of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Indian politics. Engagement with Pakistan does not appeal to its electoral base. With the absence of a strong opposition in Indian politics, the BJP has the space to avert any sort of engagement with Pakistan and it will likely do so. Similarly, stability in Afghanistan is not on India’s priority list as it is seen as an instrumental factor in promoting unrest in Pakistan. Likewise, the likelihood of SAARC playing any constructive and meaningful role appear dim, given the prevalent mistrust. In such circumstances, the concept of ‘hybrid peace’ becoming a reality does not appear very bright in the near future.

It is also pertinent to mention that there is another book by the author titled ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management between India and Pakistan’ written on the same lines comprehensively covering important events that shaped Indo-Pak relations. It will be helpful to read it prior to reading this book to have a thorough and chronological overview of the evolution of the bilateral relations from independence till the Balakot strikes.   

Overall, the book is an excellent and unique take on the current political environment of South Asia. It is recommended to South Asian experts and students of International Relations who want to develop regional expertise. It will be beneficial for those who are interested in viewing Indo-Pak relations from a new lens. It will be equally valuable for the policymakers of both countries to understand the importance of constructive engagement between the two states and assess their decision-making styles accordingly. Most importantly, it is recommended to citizens of India and Pakistan to have a better understanding of a rivalry that adversely impacts their daily lives.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »