your Dollars - Dr Usman- Article thematic Image - January 2023 copy

Since Pakistan’s foreign reserves began to fall in 2022, the public has often been presented with two different figures representing the dollars in the country. One set is that available to the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), which is now in the $5-$6 billion range, and the second is the larger sum that includes the dollars held in the private banking system, which adds a further $6 billion for a total sum of $11-$12 billion dollars. The money in the commercial banking system is, for the layman’s purposes, depositors’ dollars in private holdings, which you and I can create by parking US dollars in personal accounts. These are not the government’s property; they are private-owned holdings in the private banking system.

Yet an emergent political rhetoric has begun to conflate the commercial banks’ dollar deposits with that held in the central bank reserves, and this is both dangerous and worrisome for citizens who have entrusted the nation’s banking system with their foreign currency deposits. Rumors have been flying around that, if push comes to shove, the government might freeze these accounts or force their conversion at the (bad) official exchange rate to Rupees. If this were to happen, it would have severely damaging consequences for the economy that would far outlast the global recessionary headwinds that abound today.

A similar mistake of freezing dollar accounts occurred after the 1998 tests, when Finance Minister Sartaj Aziz declared in a press conference that foreign currency accounts worth about $7 billion (a similar amount to today) would be paralyzed. The damage to the banking system and the public outrage over this move was easily subdued by a general euphoria of having become a nuclear power, and the jubilations across every street and ally in the country. There is no such jubilation today, and the public support that existed in those triumphant days is nowhere to be found. Back then, the Rupee was Rs.44/dollar, today it is either Rs.227 at the untenable “official” rate or up to $260 in the real world, if one can even find the dollars.

Four further problems persist in the current stagflationary environment. First, hoarding and speculation remain rife, distorting market signals where even the black market rate is an exaggeratedly low figure, while the “official” rate is an exaggeratedly high figure, and all the bombast of government protecting the rupee is being paid short shrift by the currency mafia. Second, private banking channels have themselves worsened the dollar dearth through manipulative practices. Third, grandstanding by the government about the IMF deal, and the lack of progress on measures stipulated in the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) is compounding the anxiety of the business community. Fourth, the SBP’s role as the de facto “broker” of dollars is playing havoc with the industrial sector, which will ultimately reduce the exports through which foreign exchange would be earned.

In such desperate circumstances, it is very tempting for the government to reach into the pockets of the people. This implies that the government has the right to squeeze the saver-citizens who have parked their dollars in Pakistan. In doing so, it will have a severely negative impact on the reputational and stability elements of the financial system, magnifying hoarding and speculation, pressurizing the banks further, and still not remedying the longer-term problem. Grabbing the additional $6 billion of citizen reserves will at best give the government six months (at $1 billion in imports/month). What then?

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »