middle east

One year has passed since the Abraham Accords were brokered by the United States between United Arab Emirates (UAE), Israel, and Bahrain. This was followed by the addition of Morocco and Sudan shortly afterwards. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members normally take decisions after consulting with their GCC allies. Signing of Abraham Accords is an example of high-level cohesion where Bahrain, Sudan, Morocco and UAE are aligned to cooperate with Israel purely on transactional basis. The accords were primarily based on the idea of Arab-Israel normalization – a step leading to peace in the Middle East. However, the reality is contrary to the noise made by the initiators in the name of peace. To date, nothing from the lofty promises has been realized because of the Machiavellian nature of Israeli political establishment.

Complex domestic and foreign policy realities of member states manifest the parochial interests and realpolitik of all the stakeholders involved. The rationale behind the recognition of Israel by the UAE was that after decades of animosity with Arab states, Israel has emerged as a strong military, economic and political power in the region with US support. While, some analysts argue that the Accords provide new avenues of economic, strategic and political cooperation for member states, there are those who point out that the Arab-Israeli normalization came at the cost of the Palestinian cause.

It has to be pointed out though that these Accords have opened new economic avenues for member states in diversifying their business – in fields other than oil. Since normalization of ties, the volume of trade between UAE and Israel has grown rapidly to USD 600 million. UAE now eyes increasing this number to USD 1 trillion over the next decade. The World Economic Forum Report 2020 argues that this normalization will also have a positive impact on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the Middle East. Furthermore, a dedicated fund has been created called the ‘Abraham Funds’ to promote economic cooperation in the region. This positive trend encourages states aspiring to achieve economic prosperity to normalize their relations with Israel.

The Abraham Accords are not only touted for boosting economic cooperation, but also set the stage for cooperation in strategic areas like Artificial Intelligence, development of anti-drone systems, big data analysis, and acquisition of advanced class Israeli and American weaponry. One of the initial moves following the normalization agreement was a meeting between UAE and Israel’s cyber experts in Tel Aviv where their cyber security chiefs discussed cooperation in the cyber realm. UAE has always looked to Israel as an experienced player in technology and industrial base, wishing they could be as successful in transforming their societies into hubs of innovation. Under the ambit of these Accords, UAE leadership will have more opportunities to transform their society into a hub of innovation and modernize its technology and industrial base.

From the geostrategic point of view, the Accords may serve as a counterforce to Iran. As almost all Arab countries treat Iran as a threat to their interests in the region, therefore finding an anti-Iran ally would be in favor of their political interest. However, with the change in political administration both in the US and Iran, the political aspect of the Accords may have to be revisited as per the needs of the time.

The US, under the Biden administration, is interested in reopening negotiations with Iran. Similarly, the new Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi has signaled his willingness to return to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) agreement to reap economic benefits. Israel, on the other hand, is apprehensive of this move by the US. In a recent meet-up, the Israeli Prime Minister voiced concerns regarding the revival of JCPOA and presented Biden a new strategy to counter Iran. This new strategy is based on strengthening alliances with the Arab countries and carrying covert Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. The objective of countering Iran and the mindset of Israeli leadership reiterates the fact that Abraham Accords were a preplanned strategy to secure the vested interests of all stakeholders. The US political establishment reassured its full support to Israel vis-à-vis its efforts for Iran’s containment.

The Abraham Accords, under the cover of peace, have proved more beneficial in improving bilateral relations between UAE and Israel rather than bringing peace and a logical conclusion to the Palestinian issue. The same could be observed in the meeting held during the first week of September 2021 between Israeli and American political leadership as the Palestinian question was absent from their agenda. Keeping in view the above-stated aspects of the Abraham Accords, it is by no means a peace deal, rather a smart transaction in which national interests of the US, Bahrain, UAE, and Israel seem to converge.

This Arab-Israel normalization and growing strategic ties between Arab states, Israel and India are real foreign policy challenges for Pakistan. If Pakistan does not deal with the issue in a pragmatic manner it will be singled out as the Muslim country opposed to the national interest of GCC countries. This is already happening as people of GCC states have started to perceive Pakistanis on their soil as a potential threat. Similarly, the India and Israel alliance has resulted in strengthening of the former’s relationship with the Gulf encouraging them to extend cooperation in geopolitical and geostrategic affairs. So, from Pakistan’s standpoint, this relationship needs to be tackled in a more neutral manner by strengthening its ties with all relevant stakeholders. The prime objective of such a neutral approach is to secure Pakistan’s larger national interest, its national security and image at the international level.

Amna Tauhidi is a researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Kaplan,  F. “What the Trump-facilitated “Abraham Accord between Israel and two Arab monarchies really means.” Slate, 15 Sep.https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/trump-israel-uae-bahrain-deal.html


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »