afghan_taliban_article_pic

All eyes are once again on Afghanistan as the future of the country remains uncertain after the US withdrawal.  It appears that instability will prevail in the country since the situation has become extremely complicated due to the involvement of several regional, international as well as state and non-state actors. The question remains: Who will be blamed for the chaos that is likely to follow?    

The traditional blame game has already started.  Addressing the international regional connectivity conference hosted by Uzbekistan,  President Ashraf Ghani stated that the Pakistani government has failed to influence the Taliban to “negotiate seriously” in order to end the Afghan war. According to him, Pakistan needs to use its “influence and leverage”  to convince the Taliban to cease hostilities in Afghanistan. 

These comments are surprising since it is Pakistan which has been the primary external victim of this war and has suffered extensively.  The spillover effect of the conflict has adversely impacted  Pakistan economically, politically and militarily. Having lost nearly 70,000 lives and millions of dollars, it is shocking that it is being discredited by its neighbor and blamed for the mess created by others, in Afghanistan.   

For many years, Prime Minister Imran Khan advocated for a non-military solution to end this long war.  History is now witness to how important it was to reach a political settlement back in the day. Negotiating a peace agreement when there was a  sizeable presence of  US  troops and weaponry in Afghanistan was the most suitable window to end the conflict with minimum compromises and limited turmoil.    Pakistan’s Prime Minister is not wrong when he asks “Why would they  [Taliban]  listen  to  us when  they  are  sensing victory?” This statement accurately sums up the current status of the conflict in Afghanistan.  

Today,  the  Taliban see themselves as the sole stakeholders of  Afghanistan. They speak from a position of relative strength and appear to have learned lessons from the past. The extensive fighting over the past two decades has trained them significantly. They are now better organized and have emerged as a self-sustaining, independent entity. They have their own office in  Doha.  They have been negotiating the peace agreement directly with the Americans. Their calculated statements are indicative of their political and diplomatic prowess. While Pakistan has facilitated the peace talks and made tireless efforts to bring the Taliban to the negotiation table, the agreement in February 2020 was signed directly between the Taliban and Washington which speaks volumes about their position and influence.    

The Taliban have their own military strategy and foreign policy. Hence, they do not rely on any other country for decision-making. Giving  an interview to a Pakistani news channel earlier this month, Suhail Shaheen, the  spokesperson  for  the  Tehreek-e-Taliban  Afghanistan  stated  that  “Pakistan is welcome to help the Taliban arrive at a negotiated settlement in Afghanistan but it cannot dictate to us or impose its views on us.” Their actions are aligned with such statements.  

Over the past few weeks, the local Afghan defense forces have been seen forfeiting in front of the Taliban without even putting up a fight in many areas. Since May,  several Afghan troops have fled to Tajikistan in the wake of the series of offenses launched by the Taliban. On 26 July, 46  Afghan soldiers, including 5 officers crossed into Pakistan after fleeing the  Taliban offenses. They were later repatriated back to their country. 

Taliban groups have taken control of a number of major districts, key border crossings and important trade routes/roads.  They also have access to extensive weaponry to achieve their various objectives.    Apparently, the armaments, which were to be used against the Taliban are ending up in their own hands having captured weaponry from the  Afghan security forces.  This also includes around  700  trucks and  Humvees which they have been blatantly showing off. 

Such victories have made them more reluctant to sit and negotiate with the Ghani government as that could open the gates for power-sharing which is not on their priority list. On the contrary, they are bent on showing the world that they are the only representatives of Afghanistan, and the international community should treat them accordingly.         

The sole superpower of the world has spent more than  $2trn on the  Afghan war. Despite having the latest technologies, thousands of troops on the ground, and unlimited resources, they have not been able to dominate nor overcome the Taliban in 20 years.   

Given such circumstances, how can Pakistan exercise control over them?  Neither  Pakistan nor any other country can pressurize them to act rationally.  As victors,  they can only be convinced and motivated not dictated.    

Pakistan has played an important role as a peace facilitator. However, the future of Afghanistan will be shaped by how the intra-Afghan equations play out.  It is the Afghans themselves who will decide the fate of Afghanistan and Pakistan cannot be blamed for the fallout that awaits.      

A stable Afghanistan is a prerequisite for regional stability. Pakistan is aware of this. If chaos prevails, it will directly impact Pakistan in the days to come. The country has already provided shelter to 3 million Afghan refugees. It will be a mammoth challenge if there is another massive influx of refugees. This will also put the security situation at a  greater risk.  Hence, Pakistan’s first and foremost priority has to be its own national interest. It has neither the desire nor the leverage to influence the Taliban. 

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security  Studies (CASS). This article was first published in Eurasia Review. The author can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »