M Mubashir Ehsan-BR-Public Value

Book Review

Usman W. Chohan, Public Value and the Digital Economy (London/New York: Routledge, 2021)

Reviewed by M. Mubashir Ehsan

Various practical learnings can be abstracted from the book, which ultimately converges towards digital inclusion and the integration of different social/technological systems. For example, Chohan illustrates the relationship between politicians and public managers (bureaucrats) and highlights the need to form a ‘Parliamentary Technology Office (PTO)’ as a way through which technical assistance can be provided to parliamentarians. The book draws a parallel to the Parliamentary Budgetary Office, which in practical terms can be beneficial for developing and emerging economies. He then explores another significant relationship – public managers and civil society. The Public Value literature has not explored this relationship comprehensively, but this subject has been increasingly gaining traction.

In Public Value and the Digital Economy, Dr Usman W. Chohan, Director Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, explores the digital economy through the lens of Public Value Theory (PVT), to answer questions related to creating and co-creating value at the managerial level. The author identifies a theoretical gap in the understanding of the relationship between the agents ‘who must co-create public value,’ and throughout the book, he emphasises the Value Co-Creation (VCC) approach and the relationship between different agents, i.e., public managers, politicians, civil society, and private interest.

Virtual assets (cryptocurrency specifically) are used across several developed and developing countries. The author, in this regard, highlights the debate related to innovation vs. accountability and freedom vs. security. This helps show how different values in a digital context need to be reconciled, which is a difficult balancing act. Chohan makes prescient observations on trends that are only now emerging, such as regulatory issues related to cryptocurrency that are discussed in the daily news only now, such as El Salvador’s currency switch.

Dr Chohan also highlights a significant link between ‘accommodative value co-creation through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)’. In the realm of the digital economy, there are often cases where the public sector seeks assistance and collaboration from the private sector due to a lack of expertise in this domain. In practice, it is seen, at the government level, even in Pakistan, that there are working groups and projects formed through PPPs, especially in areas of digital transformation. Moreover, he explains the increasing power of tech companies serving their own private interests and how these companies avoid tax systems. The US, along with other developed economies, has amplified its focus on digital taxation recently, so his exhaustive explanation, about the ways to counter private monopolistic powers through strong digital taxation policies, rings very true.

The book also offers a futuristic vision using the interaction of PVT and the digital medium to explore governance aspects. Furthermore, it delves into new concepts like ‘Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)’ by visualising a world where managerial functions are possible without humans. Dr Chohan highlights some of the limitations regarding DAOs but emphasises that this futuristic approach will enhance the value creation process through higher efficiency, greater transparency, and equity-focused results.

This publication is certainly worth reading as it offers an insightful perspective on how to explore the digital economy in detail without being confusing or difficult. In fact, it should be on the must reading list of those in public administration and economics, and particularly those eager to understand the rapidly evolving global digital economy through the Public Value Theory (PVT) perspective. The book presents a comprehensive literature review that zooms in at the micro level to understand the relationships between the different agents of society who can co-create value in a digital context.

M. Mubashir Ehsan is a former Researcher who worked at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »