Usman W. Chohan, Public Value and the Digital Economy

M Mubashir Ehsan-BR-Public Value

Book Review

Usman W. Chohan, Public Value and the Digital Economy (London/New York: Routledge, 2021)

Reviewed by M. Mubashir Ehsan

Various practical learnings can be abstracted from the book, which ultimately converges towards digital inclusion and the integration of different social/technological systems. For example, Chohan illustrates the relationship between politicians and public managers (bureaucrats) and highlights the need to form a ‘Parliamentary Technology Office (PTO)’ as a way through which technical assistance can be provided to parliamentarians. The book draws a parallel to the Parliamentary Budgetary Office, which in practical terms can be beneficial for developing and emerging economies. He then explores another significant relationship – public managers and civil society. The Public Value literature has not explored this relationship comprehensively, but this subject has been increasingly gaining traction.

In Public Value and the Digital Economy, Dr Usman W. Chohan, Director Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, explores the digital economy through the lens of Public Value Theory (PVT), to answer questions related to creating and co-creating value at the managerial level. The author identifies a theoretical gap in the understanding of the relationship between the agents ‘who must co-create public value,’ and throughout the book, he emphasises the Value Co-Creation (VCC) approach and the relationship between different agents, i.e., public managers, politicians, civil society, and private interest.

Virtual assets (cryptocurrency specifically) are used across several developed and developing countries. The author, in this regard, highlights the debate related to innovation vs. accountability and freedom vs. security. This helps show how different values in a digital context need to be reconciled, which is a difficult balancing act. Chohan makes prescient observations on trends that are only now emerging, such as regulatory issues related to cryptocurrency that are discussed in the daily news only now, such as El Salvador’s currency switch.

Dr Chohan also highlights a significant link between ‘accommodative value co-creation through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)’. In the realm of the digital economy, there are often cases where the public sector seeks assistance and collaboration from the private sector due to a lack of expertise in this domain. In practice, it is seen, at the government level, even in Pakistan, that there are working groups and projects formed through PPPs, especially in areas of digital transformation. Moreover, he explains the increasing power of tech companies serving their own private interests and how these companies avoid tax systems. The US, along with other developed economies, has amplified its focus on digital taxation recently, so his exhaustive explanation, about the ways to counter private monopolistic powers through strong digital taxation policies, rings very true.

The book also offers a futuristic vision using the interaction of PVT and the digital medium to explore governance aspects. Furthermore, it delves into new concepts like ‘Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)’ by visualising a world where managerial functions are possible without humans. Dr Chohan highlights some of the limitations regarding DAOs but emphasises that this futuristic approach will enhance the value creation process through higher efficiency, greater transparency, and equity-focused results.

This publication is certainly worth reading as it offers an insightful perspective on how to explore the digital economy in detail without being confusing or difficult. In fact, it should be on the must reading list of those in public administration and economics, and particularly those eager to understand the rapidly evolving global digital economy through the Public Value Theory (PVT) perspective. The book presents a comprehensive literature review that zooms in at the micro level to understand the relationships between the different agents of society who can co-create value in a digital context.

M. Mubashir Ehsan is a former Researcher who worked at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Print đŸ–¨ PDF đŸ“„


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

View All Publication

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Shafaq Zernab May 7, 2026

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

Muhammad Saad May 7, 2026

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Air Vice Marshal Nasser Ul Haq Wyne(Retd) May 5, 2026

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »