Shaza Arif-Pandemics

Book Review

Usman W. Chohan, Pandemics and Public Value Management (New York & London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2022).

Reviewed by Shaza Arif

The onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic has transformed the world to a remarkable extent. Its impact will certainly be felt even when it becomes a fading memory. Among the many areas it has impacted, Public Value Management (PVM) is an intriguing case that needs to be analysed in depth through a multidimensional approach. The book ‘Pandemics and Public Value Management’, by Dr Usman W. Chohan, is a recent take on the concerned subject.

In 178 pages, the author draws attention to several aspects of PVM vis-Ă -vis COVID-19 through the lens of Public Value Theory (PVT). The book comprises six chapters. The introductory chapter provides an overview of public management with a focus on PVT and includes an overview of the book. In Chapter Two, Dr Chohan explores the lives versus livelihood dilemma vis-Ă -vis the Pandemic. Subsequently, in Chapter Three, he analyses the Pandemic in the context of misinformation in the post-truth era, and its implications on the health sector. The role of the World Health Organisation (WHO) is analysed in Chapter Four. After discussing the challenges confronted by the organisation, Dr Chohan applies the ‘Strategic Triangle’ to assess its limitations in performing optimally. This is followed by vaccine nationalism, discussed in Chapter Five. It highlights concerns about ‘vaccine nationalism’ as a socioeconomic problem. It also compares value preferences and conflicts at the national and international levels by listing cases for and against vaccine nationalism and proposes recommendations for value creation at the global level. This is followed by a comparative analysis of India-Pakistan in managing the Pandemic and thoughtful concluding chapter.

‘Pandemics and Public Value Management’ is an excellent, relevant, and timely contribution to public value literature. It adopts a pragmatic approach in analysing public values from multiple angles to help comprehend critical aspects of a global health crisis which is still part of our daily lives, even if not at the same level. The book not only explores the creation of public value but also studies how it can be weakened to underscore the broader dynamics of public management. While it is true that the subjects tackled in the book have repeatedly been discussed on multiple academic platforms, the book’s core strength is that it reveals underlying reasons in a structured manner to help the reader recognise ‘Why’ certain circumstances occurred the way they did during the Pandemic, and ‘How’ was public value perceived by concerned stakeholders.

The overall structure of the book and each chapter is well-organised. While the concepts listed in the initial chapters are applied in the succeeding parts to offer clearer understanding, the beauty of the book is that every chapter can be read independently to have fresh insights into the specific aspect. Tables and figures are useful and engaging. Concepts such as the Public Value Strategic Triangle (p.130), Triangle of Disvalue (p.66), Multiangle Triangle Approach (p.133), and their application were new for me, but their practical linkages helped in understanding them easily. The data and literature cited vividly demonstrates the research prowess of the author.

The contribution of the book in terms of policy-making deserves due appreciation. By comparing the cases of India and Pakistan vis-à-vis management of the pandemic in Chapter Six, Dr Chohan has validated the assertion that it is possible to balance lives and livelihoods, in contrast to choosing one over the other. For me, this section is the book’s most interesting chapter. The findings reveal that the concerned actors of public management can overcome the constraints of operational resources via value co-creation, as evident in Pakistan’s case of effectively managing the Pandemic. It highlights that collaborative and synchronised efforts of politicians, public managers, and civil society can lead to miraculously positive results. Hence, it can serve as a guiding light for policymakers in testing times. In addition, given the pace of the manifestation of the impacts of climate change, one cannot rule out the onset of more pandemics in the future. Hence, it would help concerned stakeholders to draw important lessons to tackle another potential pandemic and be well-prepared to counter threats such as misinformation and vaccine nationalism, both of which played a major role in worsening the pandemic situation, etc. The book should also be credited for identifying the existing constraints faced by the WHO. The pandemic should be a wake-up call for the international community to invest wisely and generously in the international organisation to increase its effectiveness.

The book is definitely worth the time and effort and is highly recommended reading. It would be helpful to policymakers around the world in articulating better policies in disruptive times; and equally important for concerned actors involved in PVM to understand the significance of the impact of their respective roles. It would also be of great use for the students of public management to have a more refined grasp of the various contours of their field.

Shaza Arif is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected] 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »