Title Cover- PER-US Tariff-27 March 2025-Front

The United States (US) Administration under President Donald Trump imposed a 10 percent tariff on all Chinese imports starting 4 February 2025, which was increased to 20 percent on 4 March 2025. In response, Beijing announced a 15 percent tariffs on US LNG and coal, a 10 percent tariff on crude oil and farm equipment, and imposed export controls on rare earth minerals—moves widely seen as retaliation, reigniting trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

Additionally, a 25 percent tariff was announced on most imports from Canada and Mexico, along with a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy exports. While these tariffs were initially set to take effect on 4 March 2025, they were suspended for 30 days for goods compliant with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA). However, a degree of uncertainty surrounding the future trajectory of these tariffs persists. Simultaneously, the Administration reinstated the full 25 percent tariff on all steel imports and raised tariffs on aluminium imports to 25 percent. President Trump also signed a directive instructing the administration to propose a new round of ‘reciprocal tariffs,’ signalling a further escalation in trade restrictions.

These evolving global trade dynamics necessitate close evaluation by countries, including Pakistan, to assess potential economic implications. Adopting a proactive approach and staying prepared for sudden shifts in global trade dynamics is imperative. In view of this, the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, organised a Zoom Webinar on 19 March 2025 on ‘US Tariff Policies: Global Economic Impact, Trade Realignments and Pakistan’s Positions.’

The discussion aimed to explore the effect of US tariff policies on global economic growth, trade stability, and global trade governance. It also aimed to analyse the challenges and opportunities for Pakistan amid shifting global trade policies and recommend proactive measures to safeguard the country’s economic interests and trade repositioning. Additionally, it aimed to explore how the US tariff policies were being used as a strategic policy tool to achieve broader economic and geopolitical objectives and the possible future direction of US trade policy.

The distinguished subject matter experts who spoke at the webinar included:

  • Dr Manzoor Ahmad, Senior Fellow, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad
  • Mr Syed Ali Ehsan, Deputy Executive Director, Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME), Islamabad
  • Dr Usman W. Chohan, Advisor (Economic Affairs and National Development), Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad

The discussion was moderated by Dr Usman W. Chohan, Advisor at CASS with Concluding Remarks by President CASS Air Marshal Javaid Ahmed (Retd).


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »