Related Image - Dr Zia Shamsi

At this time, at least two South Asian states, Pakistan and Sri Lanka are facing serious political and economic crises. While comparing the difference between the two, Dr Abid Suleri has rightly concluded that the Sri Lankan economic crisis led to political turmoil in the island state, whereas a home-grown or perhaps externally-supported political crisis, has led to a serious economic crisis in Pakistan.

The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka is a multi-religious and multi-ethnic island in the Indian Ocean. According to Human Development Report 2020, ‘Sri Lanka’s HDI value for 2019 is 0.782- which put the country in the high human development category- positioning it at 72 out of 189 countries and territories.’

Sri Lanka ranked first in South Asia due to its massive investment in human resource development, education, and health, due to which Sri Lankan workers are widely respected by host nations, particularly as paramedics. Sri Lanka has over three million-strong diaspora across the globe.

The island nation underwent some difficult times from 1983 to 2009, due to a civil war, which impeded its development and weakened its economy. However, the State showed resilience and consistency, with the support of international and regional states to crush the Tamil insurgency, and returned to peace and normalcy. However, the more recent COVID-19 pandemic had an extremely adverse impact on Sri Lanka’s economy, which was heavily reliant on tourism and foreign remittances. The country has already had a violent change in government and defaulted on its international obligations related to debt servicing etc.

On the other hand, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the fifth largest country with a population of over 220 million is also facing serious politico-economic crises. Pakistan’s economy has also been under stress due to the worldwide economic meltdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, even though the country is one of the few that has done exceedingly well to control the disease. Pakistan is heavily dependent on the support of international donor agencies and friendly states for its imports of petroleum products and industrial goods. Whereas, Pakistan does export a variety of items, including small industrial products, textile products, food items, and services, however, it heavily relies on foreign remittances from its nine million-strong diaspora across the globe.

A careful analysis of the current political turmoil in Sri Lanka and Pakistan clearly reflects the apathy of the ruling elite and its wrong priorities. For the same reason, the Sri Lankan crisis became violent and ruling elites were targeted and physically tortured by mobs whenever they were seen in public. A number of incidents of setting properties of ousted rulers on fire were also reported after which the President terminated the government and a new Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe was appointed on 12 May 2022, after weeks of violent political unrest. The incumbent PM has appealed to international donor agencies and friendly nations for urgent financial assistance to buy essential food items and much-needed oil supplies to revive its bankrupt economy.

Whereas, in Pakistan, at the moment, the situation is not as volatile as it was in Sri Lanka, but is extremely uncertain. Pakistan is not only facing political and economic crises but also a kind of constitutional crisis. There are a number of legal proceedings at this time in the apex court as well as local high courts related to the legitimacy of the incumbent regime. The currency is in free fall and has devalued by at least Rupees 22.00 to a USD at the time of writing this article in a little under two months. The same is happening at various stock exchanges due to a lack of investor confidence. The present government in Pakistan has given up to the demand of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and done away with the subsidy on oil, thereby increasing the prices of oil products to unprecedented levels.

To conclude this brief review of the current politico-economic crises in South Asian states, I would say that successive governments in both Sri Lanka and Pakistan have failed to formulate and execute people-friendly policies related to essential elements of human security so as to ensure the well-being of the people. Whereas Pakistan is still away from Sri Lanka-like violence, and therefore, efforts must be made to immediately resolve the ongoing constitutional and political crises, while economic recovery will understandably take longer if initiated forthwith.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan’ (2020) and ‘South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace’ (2021). He is presently working as Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Times. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »