2 Rupees

There are two currencies in Pakistan: one is the rupee at the official rate, and the other is the rupee in the gray market. One is currently trading in the Rs.220-230/dollar range, while the other (and much rarer) currency trades at more than Rs.260/dollar, and so they trade at different prices, despite having the same name. Whether one aims to trade either one, however, the problem is the same: there simply aren’t enough dollars to trade for either one. This is in fact the most pressing problem that Pakistan faces, with foreign reserves having fallen below $5 billion dollars. This gives the country an import cover of a very short nature, and so urgent infusions of dollars are required.

Pakistan is not the only country that faces this challenge, however, since the problem has more to do with the US dollar itself rather than with any developing country. Egypt, Ghana, Sri Lanka, El Salvador, and many others face acute shortages and have made their way to the IMF, which is demanding serious and focused macroeconomic frameworks that will be more fiscally sustainable in the future. The currencies of these countries have also fallen and are trading in two measures as well (like our two different Rupees). Whereas 16 Egyptian pounds bought a dollar last year, today it is closer to 28 pounds (and was briefly at 32 pounds).  

The central banks of such countries, including our SBP, have thus sought to restrict the outflows of dollars through a series of strict measures. For us, the strictness of the SBP measures has resulted in a gray market, which is the second Rupee’s domain, and the one towards which the first Rupee is being forced to gravitate . The SBP’s measures are also severely damaging to the real economy, since its refusal to issue letters of credit (LCs) to importers has meant that more than 5,700 containers cannot be processed, many of which carry items such as food, medicine and industrial raw materials, which are thus spoiling away at the ports.

Many key industries in Pakistan require imports as part of the inputs in their exportable finished goods (cotton for textiles, for example). Without these imports, the export-oriented industries cannot produce their goods and thus generate foreign exchange, which is precisely how the problem began in the first place. In addition, the government generates significant tax revenues from imports, which means that there is a hit on the revenue collection side (fiscal deficit) as well. Since the State Bank Amendment Act was hurriedly passed more than a year ago, the remit of the central bank was narrowed to inflation-management. It was not to act as a de facto broker for dollars, or as an import czar that refuses all imports. By the narrow mandate that it received, it has failed, since Dec. 2022 inflation was in the ballpark of an astounding 25%. In the meantime, its erstwhile responsibility to protect the Rupee has also stumbled, since the country now wields two alternate Rupees, neither of which can be exchanged easily for dollars, and people have begun to hoard any remaining dollars while piling up into gold as an alternative.

The IMF is loath to tolerate two separate Rupees, and it is pressurizing the government to accept the (gray) market rate in a freely-adjusting system rather than trying to create a Venezuelan or Argentinian farce of an official vs. unofficial rate. The problem is that, due to panic in the market, the gray rate is also perhaps an exaggerated one, and the actual rate is closer to the middle of the two values. In addition, the current dispensation has boasted extensively about securing the Rupee, knowing full well that it is not in a position to do anything about a global polycrisis (inflation, war in Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, US Fed policy).

But the notion that two different rates can persist is silly, and will have to be reconciled soon enough, especially when the IMF will be the ultimate arbiter of dollar resupply in Pakistan. Therefore, the tough choices that it is forcing must be considered with courage and sobriety. Last week, the head of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce (KCC) ceremoniously offered to hand the keys of his organization to the Governor SBP, since there was nothing he could no longer do. It would be better still, however, if the keys of the nation are handed to the people, before the crisis worsens any further.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »