The aim of this essay is to shed light on the economic and political implications of a second administration under Donald Trump, by exploring seven key paradoxes that may characterise his approach to complex socioeconomic, sociopolitical, and geoeconomic decisions. In highlighting these paradoxes, the essay aims to emphasise the paradoxical modes of governance and conflicting ambitions that the Trump administration will wrest with based on the multiplicity of its stated objectives. In particular, Trump’s blend of populism, protectionism, and nationalism will manifest in policies that may work at cross-purposes, because they emanate from disparate ideological sources and interest groups: the nativism of Project 2025, the disenchantment and rebellion of the downtrodden, the pragmatism of the corporatocracy, the protectionism of working class voters, the recidivism of male voters, and the technofeudalism of big tech. The paradoxes that emerge from such a mish-mash will nevertheless reshape both American as well as global economics, politics, and society, which is why this essay may serve an equally prescient purpose for those that did vote for him as did not, and for those who can vote in US elections as those that cannot. There are seven paradoxes that warrant examination in this essay and will be addressed in the following sequence. First, the essay will consider the paradox of restricting both legal and illegal immigration with the promise of driving innovation and economic competitiveness. Second, the essay will address Trump’s ambition to sustain dollar hegemony while simultaneously reducing America’s trade deficit, a paradox that will likely accelerate dedollarisation efforts globally. Third, it will explore Trump’s desire to project America’s global economic leadership without the traditional largesse extended to allies, a shift likely to provoke new geopolitical realignments as the cost-benefit equation of following along with America becomes increasingly disfavourable for other nations. Fourth, the essay will examine the paradox articulated by Project 2025 of expanding the American population without a corresponding investment in human capital (‘growing numbers, shrinking futures’) —a dynamic that would product more Americans but worse ones. Fifth, the essay will discuss the paradox of strengthening family structures under Project 2025 while simultaneously imposing restrictive policies that may erode personal autonomy and increase domestic stressors, tighter family units that are tightened by force. Sixth, the essay will explore Trump’s efforts to ease economic hardship through protectionist policies (sweeping tariff measures raising import costs in an import-dependent country, and tougher migration policies raising labor costs), which could paradoxically worsen rather than ease conditions for consumers. Finally, and seventh, the essay will examine Trump’s reliance on scapegoating societal groups, a strategy that may foster divisions rather than address underlying economic issues, and on the need for problems to exist in order to appear as the ‘fixer,’ this giving the semblance of fixing problems than actually solving them. Each section will analyse these paradoxes in terms of their potential impact on either economic growth/stability, social cohesion, and America’s global standing; which is to say: economics, society, and both domestic and international politics. The essay concludes by reflecting on the broader consequences of these paradoxes, noting that they reflect a nation that is at odds with itself, and that the resolution of the paradoxes may not occur in ways advantageous to America’s long-term interests.
Share this article
Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States
Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.
The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management
Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.
Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status
On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power
