Pulwama

As tensions in New Delhi reach a fever-pitch, and war hysteria grips the increasingly faltering BJP leadership, it is resorting to a dangerous gambit: get enough Indians roiled, teach Pakistan a ‘lesson’ (even a fictional one), and the election will be ours. There are two criticisms of this gambit. On one hand, it is so dangerous that it may escalate into a full-blown war, and then the loss of life in South Asia would be incalculable. That is where the focus has been in the media, and rightly so. But on the other hand, that the gambit is so clichĂ© in the fascist playbook that it is truly an insult to Indian civil society to try to sell them a rendition of what the BJP’s kindred Aryan spirits, the German Nazis, did to their own parliament (the Reichstag) in 1933.

When Hitler arose to power, his party orchestrated a fire incident in the German parliament in late February 1933, and used the destruction of the parliament as an incident to egg the German authorities towards a mass purge of the rival communist party. This incident was fundamental to the Nazi party’s consolidation of power as well as to the subsequent curtailment of civil liberties, to war against neighboring countries, and to the persecution of a religious minorities.

Considered an inside job of instructive repute, the Reichstag Fire has served for almost 90 years as a warning to the people of the world: that politicians can sacrifice the peace and lie through their teeth in order to consolidate power; and particularly so when their own mis-governance and sustained oppression of people is what is really at fault.

India right now is facing a crisis of unemployment and inequality. It harps to the world about its shining success, and yet its population faces widespread economic malaise. At the same time, the cause of Kashmir’s indigenous insurgency, that people cannot live under foreign tyranny forever, is conveniently and totally left out of the Indian media’s right-wing hysterics.

An important section of Indian society is raising serious questions about how Pulwama could have happened. After all, the Indian public is being told that one man drove alone on the wrong side of the world’s most militarized highway with enormous amounts of explosives to ram into an unusually squeezed number of troops at an unusually convenient time.

Then again, the Bollywood la-la-land where the Indian public discourse resides is fundamentally based on making movies by stealing storylines from international cinema. Stealing a classic German storyline would be par-for-the-course in the large and cartoonish in India’s right-wing media industry. By contrast, the discourse in the Pakistani media, as well as government releases, indicate that Islamabad clearly sees through this gambit, and aims to take the higher ground through restraint.

True to fascist form, Modi is drawing upon a time-tested (but ultimately futile) strategy for fascist vote buying. But the world is different, and the tactics of yore shall no longer bear the same fruit. After all, the Nazis had no nukes. The Hindu fundamentalists do, and so does Pakistan.

This is why such antiquated gambits should not just be seen as an affront to life, as they might prove to be for India, but an affront to the intelligence of the Indian electorate, which for all its dreams of catching up to the West, seems more likely to catch up to Weimar Germany than to post-war America.

The writer is director of economics and national affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »