Parallel universe stock markets

It came as something of a shock that the S&P 500 index, a supposed bellwether of the American economy, attained a level on June 8th 2020 that was so high it effectively erased any sign of the losses borne due to coronavirus (Covid-19) in earlier months.

In other words, the stock market had soared to such an extent that it had returned to a status before the rampant deaths of coronavirus, the concomitant paralysis of economic lockdown, and the breakdown of civil society following mass uprisings against American police brutality.

For die-hard believers in the financial markets, the “Free Market Taliban” as they might be called, the rising stock markets might suggest that there are really no problems in the United States, and that the virus has already fizzled away, a restive population has been calmed, and workers have a skip in their stride on their way back to the office.

Is this really the tone-deaf message that the stock markets intend to give? Are American cities really no longer smouldering from fires and teargas? Has the country with the highest number of coronavirus cases and deaths simply willed the virus out of existence?

What is this parallel universe in which the American stock market resides? Recent interviews with market gurus show many of them shrugging their shoulders with smirks of befuddlement. But the bizarro-world of American finance may in fact represent something much more nuanced. Three explanations can be posited for the resurgent markets, each of which is flimsy in its own manner.

The first and most straightforward is that recent data simply isn’t as horrific as analysts expected, and although this cannot explain the complete recouping of stock market losses, it harkens to the point that capitalists were yearning for any piece of news to jump back into the equity asset class.

One example of this was the recent US jobs report which observed a net increase of +2.5 million jobs instead of the dismal forecast of -8 million job losses. This naturally reflects the opening up of states at a time when coronavirus continues to rage and 100,000+ deaths have occurred in the US.

The second explanation is that the behemoth and outsized stimulus released by the Federal Reserve constitutes a cash infusion so large that financial institutions will be forced to spend it somehow, and will choose equities over the low (and negative) returns of bonds. Since they will have to find some avenue to spend the money conjured out of thin air, the equity markets are not representative of American reality but rather the need to do something with excess cash.

Naturally, the best use of that conjured cash would be in the pockets of the suffering masses who have been furloughed or laid off. But their wellbeing has been a priority for the Trump administration in nothing but rhetoric.

The third rationale is that the S&P 500 is no longer reflective of American life in any meaningful sense. 20% of the S&P is comprised of the five tech giants: Apple, Microsoft, Google (Alphabet), Amazon, and Facebook. These tech giants have been making a killing during the pandemic, delivering services that have not just continued but in fact grown during the lockdown.

These five giants thus have a disproportionate effect on the equity indices, and this hardly constitutes a microcosm of American life as much as it symbolizes the monopolization of American capital. The parallel universe in which American finance now dwells is as virtual as the companies that dominate the indices, bereft of any connection to raging protests, pandemic outbreaks, or the brutality of a police state.

On a final note, it is worth heeding the tension that persists at the level that the S&P has achieved, with some negative pressure since June 8th, based on sobering news from the Federal Reserve expecting a -6.5% contraction in the economy. That counter-point of sobriety is a thin strand that keeps American finance from fully residing in an entirely different universe.

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »