644945_75357535_(1)

In a press conference on 10March 2022, Director-General Inter-Services Public Relations (DG ISPR) declared that Pakistan’s Air Defence Operations Centre (ADOC), detected a supersonic flying object on the evening of 9th March that was later confirmed as a BrahMos supersonic missile. According to ISPR, the missile which was continuously tracked by Pakistan Air Force Air Defense units since its launch, traveled for about 70 to 80 kilometers within Indian territory. It then took a sudden north western turn towards the Pakistan-India border, entering Pakistani air space and traveling 124 km inside Pakistan at an altitude of 40,000 feet and speed of up to Mach 3. The missile landed at Mian Channu, Khanewal district of Punjab province, with no human casualties but damaging some civilian property.

The next day Indian Press Information Bureau’s Defence Wing issued a statement stating, ‘On 9 March 2022, in the course of routine maintenance, a technical malfunction led to the accidental firing of a missile. It is learned that the missile landed in an area of Pakistan. While the incident is deeply regrettable, it is also a matter of relief that there has been no loss of life due to the accident.’

If the missile got fired inadvertently as officially claimed by India, then the Indian technical and technological capacity to control or mitigate a missile after accidental launch is questionable. This is a serious threat to regional stability as the geostrategic environment in the region is already tense and such a mishap could have triggered a full-scale war between two nuclear-armed states.

What’s worse, an article published in India’s The Print titled “Missile accidentally fired ‘during inspection’ at secret IAF base, Pakistan ‘didn’t track’” attempted to give the impression, citing anonymous sources, that the launch was deliberate and under controlled conditions and not an accidental. One of the article’s anonymous sources gives several statements that are contradictory in nature. The author states that it was a practice version of the BrahMos missile and it followed the trajectory that it would have in case of a conflict, but ‘certain factors’ played a role in ensuring that any pre-fed target was out of danger. The statement indicates an intentional activity with certain pre-determined objectives in mind. Now, if by using a practice missile, it is being indicated that no bloodshed was intended then the question arises, what was India trying to achieve through this cross-border international launch of a tactical ballistic missile?

Secondly, the author claimed that the missile was not launched from Sirsa but some other ‘secret’ satellite base whereas the flight path shown at the media brief of ISPR identified that the missile was picked up by Pakistani radars over that area. The author has completely disregarded/missed the technical/technological aspects of the theories of radars, capabilities of air defence assets and international diplomatic norms.

Thirdly, the article claims that India had already informed relevant Pakistani authorities of the accidental launch long before ISPR held a press conference on Thursday night. It further adds that the source refused to divulge the specific time and official level at which Pakistan was informed. However, there is absolutely no mention of any such communication in any of the official statements issued by the Government of India (GoI). Since Pakistani officials stated that no information was passed on through any channel, be it the military hotline or any other mode, and the so-called sources in the GoI insist that information was passed to Pakistan; then proof of official communication, including its time and the offices used should be made public. Why is this information being kept secret?

Fourthly, the author (citing sources) claimed that because the missile traveled for 124 kilometers inside Pakistani airspace and the ISPR media briefing was held after more than 24 hours had passed since the missile landed, it is indicative that Pakistan was unable to track the trajectory of the missile. This blatant lie was addressed, during the ISPR media brief, where Air Vice Marshal Tariq Zia, through visual data, publically displayed the missile trajectory and it being tracked by Pakistan’s air defence assets. Thus, the author’s claim holds no ground, rather it highlights his absolute ignorance regarding the military and technical capabilities and procedures. Lastly, the article also states that Pakistan has sought details of the missile’s flight path and how it changed its direction mid-flight. These details have been asked for not because Pakistan does not have this information but to ascertain how this so-called ‘mishap’ happened and what management processes were adopted to avoid this cross-border ‘attack’.

The article in The Print is, therefore, is highly misleading, technically incorrect and has unsuccessfully attempted to dispel the notion that Indian authorities failed in maintaining, securing and safeguarding her strategic assets.

Whether this entire incident is an intentional act or a mishap, such irresponsible behaviour by India could have led this region into full-fledged war with disastrous consequences. India, under Prime Minister Modi, has become a rogue state with no respect for international law and on multiple occasions, the BJP government has undertaken similar misadventures (such as the failed Balakot strikes) to divert public attention from internal issues of misgovernance or to gain political mileage.

The real tragedy remains that while internationally, India’s narrative on the missile launch was accepted; had a mishap of this nature happened from Pakistan’s side, the international response would have been altogether different.

The writer is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Strafasia. He can be reached at [email protected].

Image source: Dunya News. 2022. “India admits mistake of missile in Pakistan’s Main Channu.” Dunya News. March 11. https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/644945-India-missile-Pakistan-Mian-Channu


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »