The Long March- Dr Usman - Article thematic Image - Nov copy

The world is beset by a deep, frightening, and wide-ranging economic malaise, which is likely to morph into an officially-declared global recession in 2023. The recession is arguably unofficially here already, with the major economies of the world, including the US, Europe, and China; all facing acute recessionary pressures that are driven by both local and global conditions. In Europe, for example, it is the looming gas input costs over the winter, and the threat of a new wave of destitute Ukrainian war-refugees, that is weighing down on local growth. In China, it is the extended Covid lockdowns that are stunting economic potential, along with weaknesses in its real estate sector that risk erupting into wider contagion. In the US, it is the thorough mismanagement of monetary policy by the central bank (Fed) which has collapsed not just domestic asset classes such as equities, but also sunk most of the world’s currencies.

The broader risks are in fact threefold: on the one hand, slowing economic activity is causing a widespread recession in employment and investment; on the other hand, supply shocks and politicized economics (sanctions, cartels) are leading to widespread inflation; and on yet another hand, countries are saddled with unprecedented amounts of debt, making their fiscal positions untenable if a long-lasting recession unfolds. There are at least two more factors which will strain the global economy which are only beginning to receive the requisite attention: climate change (as the floods in Pakistan sadly illustrated), and overpopulation in the Third World where resources face imminent depletion.

With these daunting challenges in mind, the most salutary path forward for the global economy, and for international peace, would lie in concerted and committed international cooperation among the brotherhood of nations, both on the urgent (inflation, recession) and on the important (climate change, overpopulation). To borrow a local buzzword, mankind requires a long march towards common progress premised on shared aspirations. Such collective effort has been appealed for by leading figures including UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, who was deeply moved by the plight of the flood-victims in Pakistan upon his recent visit.

Yet in the absence of global unity towards tackling the wicked problems that beset us, it is necessary for Pakistan’s leadership to operate and act as one mind, setting aside the differences that have boiled over into an acrimony that distracts 22 crores on a daily basis. Such distraction dissipates the nation’s energy and weakens its potency across all fronts, leading to a short-termism in approaches that is ill-suited to the economic tempest that the world is coming to confront. The world’s economic malaise calls for a long march of stoic resolve, in what may be at least a decade of hardship. With this in mind, there is a pressing need for concentration on the bigger problems that grip the world, so that we are prepared for the economic challenge ahead.

I consider this to be the “longer march” of our nation through a difficult period of international tumult. One needn’t look far for examples of countries that have already begun to falter as the times change: Sri Lanka is but one cautionary tale, Lebanon another, and the list will sadly grow. The road ahead will not be easy and may require tough measures that require a patient public that bears the brunt with equanimity. A leadership that enjoys public trust will be the only way that such patience will be foreborne, and so it behooves the nation at large as well as its nomenklatura to sit together and act in the larger national interest, which must be determined through consensus and confidence-building.

In other words, there is a “longer march” that the country must undertake, with all citizens finding common purpose in the nation’s betterment, proceeding resolutely through the tumult of the recession ahead, and rising above that tempestuous phase towards building the edifice of a better society.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Iqtida. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »