Ajwa Hijazi-MDS

The killing of Nahel Merzouk has again pushed French streets into a spiral of riots just after they were done grappling with the aftermath of the pension protests. On 27 June 2023, a teenage boy of Algerian and Moroccan descent was shot dead by the Nanterre police at a traffic stop. Initially, the police maintained that the teenager was shot because he tried to run over the police officer. However, according to the video that emerged later, the boy appeared to have been shot by the police at point-blank range. This triggered a series of protests that turned into riots, in many French cities. The protestors, along with many young people from multi-ethnic suburbs, considered Nahel’s race to be the reason behind this shooting. Amidst the policeman responsible for the killing being charged with voluntary homicide, the riots lasted for various consecutive nights causing damage of around USD 1.1 billion to businesses, with more than 3400 people getting arrested.

Although, the protests have eased down as of now, this incident needs to be seen against the backdrop of racial profiling that has been carried out by the French police over the years. Traffic stops in France have turned fatal for many individuals from mixed race background. Over the  year, 15 people have been killed by police at traffic stops, out of which the majority were of Arab or African origin. Moreover, as per a 2017 study by an independent human rights group, young Black and Arab people are 20 times more likely to be stopped by police than their white peers. In the same vein, in 2021, Amnesty International along with various international human rights organisations, filed class action lawsuits against the French state alleging ethnic profiling by the state police that is carried out during ID checks. Article 435-1 of the French Penal Code allows police to use force under certain conditions including when the driver of any vehicle does not comply with the orders to stop and is posing a threat. The Article has given legal grounds to police to use force at traffic stops, which is more blatant for certain individuals than others.

According to Crystal Fleming, a professor of Sociology at Stony Brook University, the current riots are a reaction to the presence of systemic racism in French society which is linked to the country’s colonial past. France’s history of colonisation was marked by repression and forced assimilation into the French culture, especially in Africa and the Caribbean. This legacy, by and large shaped the attitudes of present-day France, even towards third or fourth-generation immigrants. Ironically, racism can’t be addressed directly because the state of France has proclaimed itself to be ‘colour-blind’ (which means that there is no census record of any race in the country). The French Republic holds the official position that there is no discrimination in the country on the basis of race or even religion or ethnicity. And yet, situation in its streets depicts a prevalent deep-rooted system of racial segregation and discrimination in law enforcement organisations, which according to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) needs to be addressed earnestly by French authorities.

Apart from manifesting wider racial fragmentation in the country, a more troubling aspect of Nahel Merzouk’s shooting is that it has also emboldened the far-right factions in France. They are demanding more hard-line immigration policies because they consider immigrant families solely responsible for the recent riots and vandalism. Nevertheless, anger and frustration due to the reckless and brutal action of the French police are being felt across the country. The people who marched after the unfortunate incident were not from any single race, as one resident of Nanterre stated.

The current unrest is another challenge that President Macron has had to encounter since his re-election last year. He is facing the grim reality of France being embroiled in complex racial divisions to an extent where the crowdfunding campaign for the family of the police officer who killed the teenager collected more money than the one which was set up for the victim’s family.  Although, President Macron has emphasised drawing necessary lessons from the recent riots to mitigate and address such deep divisions, the real task before him is to ensure substantive actions that guarantee the eradication of racism present in the institutional framework of the French Police. In this context, the government needs to ensure that Article 435-1 does not get abused and the use of force by the police is proportional and limited against any individual regardless of ethnicity and race.

The root of the problem lies in the ignorance of ‘race’ as an issue, by the French state, for a long time. Consequently, it has given space to divisive ideologies to get nurtured since there was no  resistance from the state. The current crisis is an opportunity for Macron’s administration to acknowledge racial divisions and take concrete measures that bridge the gap between the French state and people hailing from different racial backgrounds who deserve to feel the essence of the French ideals of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »