mcms

On Feb 28, 2019, the Indian Ministry of Defence arranged a joint press briefing to salvage the reputation and professionalism of the Indian armed forces following their own foolish and unbelievable ‘surgical strike’ in Balakot area of Pakistani side of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan’s counter strike in response, not only was highly successful but also yielded the ultimate prize of two Indian Air Force fighters being shot down and one pilot being captured. Maj Gen Surinder Singh Mahal, Rear Adm T S Gujral and AVM Kapur were paraded before the press to provide incontrovertible ‘evidence’ to prove that IAF operations were highly successful while PAF’s were a failure.

What they implicitly managed to prove was the exact opposite. The press briefing started two hours late. The three services’ representatives appeared confused and under-confident. They were being forced to say something when they had nothing to say. They couldn’t provide evidence about the damage they had caused during the surgical strike, or of the F-16 they claimed to have shot down. They sought take moral high ground that they had attacked non-military targets while Pakistan had escalated the conflict by attacking military targets. When the media pressed for details, the spokespersons tried to hide behind the scope of the briefing and operational confidentiality. To a question as to what Indian forces would do henceforth, the answer was: ask him [sic] meaning Pakistan.

The earth-shaking evidence that was shown was a damaged part of an AMRAAM 120C missile. The details imprinted on the shown part when checked with indicated that these missiles had been sold to Taiwan.

Thus the only truth they were able to establish was that F-16 did undertake some operations. That’s hardly a fact worth mentioning. Once taken on, they couldn’t prove that F-16 had been shot down. As a Pakistani observer it was heartening to see the disarray the PAF operations had caused in the Indian armed forces, especially to IAF. The later would be forced to reevaluate its strategy and tactics. They would oscillate between desperation neither to respond and caution nor to repeat their mistakes.

The press briefing illustrated the truism: that truth gets out of a crack, while falsehood gets stuck in a doorway. In the instant case, it seemed to stick in the throats of the Indian spokespersons. The truth is that whatever PAF has claimed as its success, is backed by evidence, which would be released at an opportune time. The Indian armed forces may seem to be winning the war of trolls on social and electronic media, but the PAF has won the first two rounds. Without being triumphant, PAF realises and awaits the challenges of the ongoing hostilities. As always, the righteousness of its cause to defend the nation, it is prepared for the long haul. India on the other hand carried out aggression following a pre-meditated conspiracy by Narendra Modi to carry out a false-flag operation, killing its own soldiers with the malicious intent to blame it on Pakistan. Whatever ensued on Indian media was a make-believe narrative aimed at getting votes for BJP in the imminent elections by stoking anti-Pakistan sentiments. Only time will tell that whether PAF had thwarted Modi’s reelections?

The writer is the President at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »