2. Muhammah Saad-eco-res-cha-Oped thumbnail-December-2025-APP

Pakistan is often termed as a ‘resilient nation.’ However, Henley & Partners’ recently published 2025 Global Investment Risk & Resilience Index (GIRRI) tells a different story by placing it in the “Least Resilient” category. With a rank of 222nd out of 226 states, Pakistan has been delivered an eye-opening diagnosis.
This data-driven ranking reflects the economy’s fundamental challenge to absorb shocks in times of economic strain. Pakistan’s score is an indication of structural vulnerability dependent upon cyclical interventions to address the provocations it faces.
To be clear, this fragility is not a single-point failure; the GIRRI index reveals systemic areas of improvement of national resilience driven by five core metrics: political instability, financial insolvency, climate vulnerability, human capital deficits, and poor infrastructure.
The first metric covers political and governance mechanisms for stable institutions. Investors have faced notable policy fluctuations over the last few decades in Pakistan. This manifests as sudden regulatory changes and inconsistent enforcement of contracts across political cycles, thus disrupting predictability and deterring long-term capital intensive investments.
On the financial and economic front, Pakistan faces a persistently modest tax to GDP ratio of 10.6%, due to its focused tax base. This forces the state to finance public expenditures through sovereign borrowing, causing an ongoing mismanagement of fiscal deficits. This accumulated debt burden then becomes a vicious trap, where over two-thirds of national revenue is consumed for debt servicing, leaving limited funds for necessary development expenditure.
To add to the context, the 2025 floods have left an estimated damage of $2.9 billion. Although the figure is much lower than the economic losses of approximately $40 billion left by the 2022 floods, it has reaffirmed climate risk as a persistent and material threat to GDP, infrastructure, and food security.
Underdeveloped social and human capital risk to turn Pakistan’s demographic dividend into a challenge. The increasing youth bulge, with an evolving education system, is facing a growing skills gap leading the new workforce towards low-output careers. Besides social strain, this phenomenon is accelerating the brain drain at notable rates.
Lastly, Pakistan lacks robust innovation and associated infrastructure. The ongoing digital divide and uncompetitive logistics mean that even the most capable exporters face significant competitive dares.
This “resilience deficit” has daily consequences for an already concerned populace, especially the middle class. Due to low FDI and stagnant exports, there is a persistent inflation tax and a perpetually weak rupee, making essential commodities expensive and eroding purchasing power. The state is so heavily committed that public service institutions lack basic resources. There is a serious employment crisis, narrowing the middle class and increasing social tension.
One may now point to the outcomes of recent stabilization efforts. But these are initial steps, not a foundation for progress. These efforts are inclined toward resolving immediate liquidity crises, not the core resilience gap. Pakistan needs to build structural resilience based on a national consensus, complemented by sustainable national strategy. A non-partisan plan to address priorities in all five metrics is required.
For political stability, we require a binding National Economic Charter, endorsed by all political stakeholders. This will ensure stable tax, trade, and investment policy over the successive political cycles, and will significantly boost the investor confidence and market certainty.
To achieve financial strength, the government needs to expand the tax net and reconcile the budget towards prudent expenditure. Another immediate goal must be the halting of budgetary drains from loss-making state owned enterprises (SOEs). This may be attained via deep restructuring and public-private partnerships. Resultantly, it will leave a significant room for enhancing the development budget for public essentials.
For developing robust social and human capital, there is a need for targeted and in-demand skill development programs to focus on high-value careers and increase the national economic output. Funds re-allocation towards vocational training and public health will transform the demographic bulge into a dividend.
The state apparatus must re-orient itself towards innovative productivity for three goals: export-led growth, increasing export destinations and diversified FDI portfolios. For this, producers require state-of-the-art logistics, 24/7 energy support, and reliable digital infrastructure.
Lastly, climate security has become an economic imperative. Renewables and water security are no more a “green luxury.” It is a fundamental de-risking plan to absorb climate shocks and substantial fuel import invoices.
Policy-makers in Pakistan have prioritized and traded short-term survival for long term stability for too long. Now, it is paramount to build an economic system that is durable and shock-resilient characterized by export-led growth and diversified investment portfolios with a skilled populace employed in high-value sectors.

Muhammad Saad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »