2. Muhammah Saad-eco-res-cha-Oped thumbnail-December-2025-APP

Pakistan is often termed as a ‘resilient nation.’ However, Henley & Partners’ recently published 2025 Global Investment Risk & Resilience Index (GIRRI) tells a different story by placing it in the “Least Resilient” category. With a rank of 222nd out of 226 states, Pakistan has been delivered an eye-opening diagnosis.
This data-driven ranking reflects the economy’s fundamental challenge to absorb shocks in times of economic strain. Pakistan’s score is an indication of structural vulnerability dependent upon cyclical interventions to address the provocations it faces.
To be clear, this fragility is not a single-point failure; the GIRRI index reveals systemic areas of improvement of national resilience driven by five core metrics: political instability, financial insolvency, climate vulnerability, human capital deficits, and poor infrastructure.
The first metric covers political and governance mechanisms for stable institutions. Investors have faced notable policy fluctuations over the last few decades in Pakistan. This manifests as sudden regulatory changes and inconsistent enforcement of contracts across political cycles, thus disrupting predictability and deterring long-term capital intensive investments.
On the financial and economic front, Pakistan faces a persistently modest tax to GDP ratio of 10.6%, due to its focused tax base. This forces the state to finance public expenditures through sovereign borrowing, causing an ongoing mismanagement of fiscal deficits. This accumulated debt burden then becomes a vicious trap, where over two-thirds of national revenue is consumed for debt servicing, leaving limited funds for necessary development expenditure.
To add to the context, the 2025 floods have left an estimated damage of $2.9 billion. Although the figure is much lower than the economic losses of approximately $40 billion left by the 2022 floods, it has reaffirmed climate risk as a persistent and material threat to GDP, infrastructure, and food security.
Underdeveloped social and human capital risk to turn Pakistan’s demographic dividend into a challenge. The increasing youth bulge, with an evolving education system, is facing a growing skills gap leading the new workforce towards low-output careers. Besides social strain, this phenomenon is accelerating the brain drain at notable rates.
Lastly, Pakistan lacks robust innovation and associated infrastructure. The ongoing digital divide and uncompetitive logistics mean that even the most capable exporters face significant competitive dares.
This “resilience deficit” has daily consequences for an already concerned populace, especially the middle class. Due to low FDI and stagnant exports, there is a persistent inflation tax and a perpetually weak rupee, making essential commodities expensive and eroding purchasing power. The state is so heavily committed that public service institutions lack basic resources. There is a serious employment crisis, narrowing the middle class and increasing social tension.
One may now point to the outcomes of recent stabilization efforts. But these are initial steps, not a foundation for progress. These efforts are inclined toward resolving immediate liquidity crises, not the core resilience gap. Pakistan needs to build structural resilience based on a national consensus, complemented by sustainable national strategy. A non-partisan plan to address priorities in all five metrics is required.
For political stability, we require a binding National Economic Charter, endorsed by all political stakeholders. This will ensure stable tax, trade, and investment policy over the successive political cycles, and will significantly boost the investor confidence and market certainty.
To achieve financial strength, the government needs to expand the tax net and reconcile the budget towards prudent expenditure. Another immediate goal must be the halting of budgetary drains from loss-making state owned enterprises (SOEs). This may be attained via deep restructuring and public-private partnerships. Resultantly, it will leave a significant room for enhancing the development budget for public essentials.
For developing robust social and human capital, there is a need for targeted and in-demand skill development programs to focus on high-value careers and increase the national economic output. Funds re-allocation towards vocational training and public health will transform the demographic bulge into a dividend.
The state apparatus must re-orient itself towards innovative productivity for three goals: export-led growth, increasing export destinations and diversified FDI portfolios. For this, producers require state-of-the-art logistics, 24/7 energy support, and reliable digital infrastructure.
Lastly, climate security has become an economic imperative. Renewables and water security are no more a “green luxury.” It is a fundamental de-risking plan to absorb climate shocks and substantial fuel import invoices.
Policy-makers in Pakistan have prioritized and traded short-term survival for long term stability for too long. Now, it is paramount to build an economic system that is durable and shock-resilient characterized by export-led growth and diversified investment portfolios with a skilled populace employed in high-value sectors.

Muhammad Saad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »