The Acts of Our Mercy

On February 26th, 2019 the Indian Air Force (IAF) engaged in an hasty misadventure against Pakistan, and was met with an immediate and impeccably executed response that later came to be known as Operation Swift Retort.

In the heat of that confrontation, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) shot down Indian airplanes and captured a single pilot alive. Wing Commander Abhinandan was taken into custody, interrogated, and offered a memorable cup of tea which he exclaimed was “fantastic,” truly a reflection of Pakistan’s hospitality.

The vivid image of the contented buffoon Abhinandan holding a cup of tea has been etched into the Pakistani imagination, and it has often served as a ready salvo in many social media altercations between Pakistani and Indian Twitterati.

Yet Abhinandan was subsequently released by Pakistan at the Wagah-Atari border as a gesture of peace – an act of mercy. In releasing him, Pakistan was telling its rowdy and ill-behaved neighbor that it could forgive India for its temporary madness.

Pakistan would act as a magnanimous victor, and not a belligerent one, so it could set the tone for a more harmonious working relationship with a seething and venal neighbor.

But Abhinandhan’s capture and the humiliation of the IAF in Operation Swift Retort was met with a puzzling jubilation in India. Long accustomed to weaving spin and deceit into their newsflow, the pundits of the Indian media sought to portray the bumbling dupe Abhinandhan as a kind of “hero,” with a Vivek Oberoi-directed movie in the works to boot.

Not only did the Indians fail to accept the futility of their unilateral violence, they also sought to engage in mass delusion and up the ante in their war hysteria. In fact, they took the aftermath of Operation Swift Retort towards a far darker place.

On August 5th, 2019, they did away entirely with any pretense of humanity in their illegally occupied territory, and unilaterally annexed the disputed territory of Kashmir. They then placed the Vale of Kashmir in a blanket of silence and terror, so the world would not see how the tentacles of their machinations would twirl.

This was followed by equally contemptuous moves by the Indian state, such as the promulgation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), that disproportionately hurt their Muslim population. At the same time, India hijacked international bodies, such as the shambolic FATF, to hamstring Pakistan through hybrid violence where their feeble attempts at kinetic violence failed.

This is the spirit with which India took Pakistan’s acts of mercy. Since 2019, India has stepped ever closer towards abject dysfunction, and yet Pakistan has firmly kept a hand of friendship open. It has continually asked India to behave like a mature state that could co-construct the foundations of a lasting peace.

But India listens not, and it leaves open wounds within its polity to fester. The demonetization disaster, the early failure to contain Covid-19 (especially in contrast to Pakistan’s pandemic performance), the brutal CAA, the unilateral annexation of Kashmir, their national macroeconomic paralysis, and the Three Farm Bills (against which protests remain widespread); they all point to a madness that has gripped India, ultimately to its own ultimate detriment.

This is the enraged beast, frothing at the mouth, to which Pakistan extends gestures of peace and acts of mercy. It is the rabid goliath to which Pakistan takes measured responses, such as the impeccably executed Operation Swift Retort, only to find India’s rage swell further.

It is difficult to see how such a predicament can be left to simmer forever. What characterizes the Subcontinent today is flashes of rage, arrogance, and blindness by the larger neighbor, and swift yet measured reponses from the smaller neighbor. How long do the rabid pundits of Delhi think that this dynamic shall continue?

Nearly two years since the execution of Operation Swift Retort, it becomes frighteningly clear that the path on which Delhi tramples today is an unsustainable one. South Asia remains a security flashpoint in world, and one where the plight of common folk (particularly in India) worsens by the day. Treating Pakistan as the Bogeyman for a litany of Indian problems can only work for so long, and the ruling party in Delhi already struggles to bank on a better excuse than finger-pointing at its neighbor.

Yet for the sake of the Indian masses, if not for those of Pakistan, the fanatics in Delhi must desist from their blind rage and adopt the behavior that befits a normal country. In other words, the biggest lesson since Operation Swift Retort is that India must engage in an act of mercy: towards itself.

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). The article was first published in THE NATION. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »