Haider Ali Khan-Tal-Afg-Fut-Oped thumbnail-Dec-2024-UPDATED

Afghanistan stands at a crossroads, grappling with governance, international isolation, and economic challenges – a precarious situation with deep ramifications for regional security. Challenges mainly stem from the complexity of the Afghan social structure, long periods of political instability, and a history of conflict. On the other hand, Afghanistan’s geostrategic location offers opportunities for regional trade and connectivity. Regional stakeholders too, have vital interests in Afghanistan’s stability, however, the country must overcome issues of inclusivity, institutional reform, and international legitimacy.

At present, Afghanistan seems to have achieved relative stability as compared to the times of the Taliban takeover in mid-2021. Major resistance to the regime has been curtailed, but this remains contingent on strict control and harsh measures. However, the Afghan people are beset with economic degradation, humanitarian crisis, and a lack of institutional framework, which could potentially destabilise the country.

Re-modelling the governance structures has produced mixed results so far. Part of the reason for reforming governance was to abolish structures established by the former Afghan republic. One of the most notable changes was restructuring the judiciary. The Islamic Emirate has invoked the  Hanafi interpretation of Sharia which presently serves as the law of the country.

Findings from a recent World Bank report highlight the critical challenges Afghanistan faces in its trade and tax structures. Trade disruptions have heavily impacted Afghanistan’s export economy, causing a drop in coal and food exports. Interestingly, Afghanistan’s internal revenue collection has seen growth, primarily through inland taxes and non-tax revenues, including passport fees and mining activities. This dual dynamic underscores the need for Afghanistan to improve domestic revenue mechanisms to offset external trade dependencies and enhance economic stability.

International recognition remains a challenge to the regime’s legitimacy, however, regional engagement with Afghanistan is growing. The Afghan Deputy Prime Minister met his Russian counterpart Alexei Overchuk last month to discuss trade, commerce, and transit. Moscow also announced the decision to delist the ‘Islamic Emirate’ from its blacklist. China’s acceptance of the Emirate’s Ambassador has also been a positive development in the Sino-Afghan relationship. Moreover, talks between Kabul and Beijing are underway to include Afghanistan in Belt and Road Initiative projects. Meanwhile, the IEA is also keen to  revive projects like CASA-1000 which are crucial for regional connectivity.  

Internal security remains a leading concern for the IEA. The  Islamic State-Khorasan Province (IS-KP) has emerged as a great challenge. In fact, IS-KP poses a threat to all regional governments, including the Taliban regime. Since its emergence in 2015, the majority of its attacks have occurred within Afghanistan. Just this month, IS-KP managed to assassinate Khalil Haqqani, the country’s Minister for Refugees and a leading figure of the Haqqani network. There are growing internal fractures within the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan, which are undermining their ability to govern effectively. Afghanistan’s history of leadership divisions and power struggles, including the Soviet invasion and Taliban’s fall in 2001, reflects a recurring pattern of fragmentation.

The Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has experienced a resurgence since the Afghan Taliban’s return to power in 2021, presenting a complex regional security challenge. Analysing this conundrum through a socio-political lens is crucial, as ideological and cultural affinities within certain factions of the Afghan Taliban have fostered sympathies toward the TTP.

The Taliban face an urgent need to establish stable institutions to effectively govern Afghanistan. Thus far, they have struggled to form a hierarchical governance structure codified under a written constitution or mechanisms for power distribution. The contentious status of women’s rights, particularly access to education, remains a significant barrier. Gender and ethnic exclusion not only hinder Afghanistan’s societal progress but also obstruct the international recognition the Taliban seek to integrate the Islamic Emirate into the global order.

Stronger diplomatic relations and bilateral trade are essential for Afghanistan’s economic recovery and regional stability. Free Trade Agreements with neighbours could help Afghanistan overcome its geographic limitations and isolation. However, before pursuing outward engagement, the Taliban must first address internal factionalism, which risks further destabilising the country. Meeting the demands of the international community, including addressing human rights concerns and fostering inclusivity, will be essential for cultivating durable ties and ensuring regional peace.

Haider Ali Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »