Shaza Arif-Str-Ai-Mod-Oped thumbnail-June-2024- AP

The pursuit of technological advancements powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become crucial for startups and organisations around the world. There is an increasing realisation of the need of being at the forefront of cross-cutting technologies in the competitive tech market. In this context, tech giants such as Open AI, Google, xAI, Meta and Microsoft, etc., are continuously racing to strengthen their chatbots/ search engines with AI. In fact, news about new AI-powered initiatives from the tech giants has stormed the internet in the last two weeks.

OpenAI, consistently making headlines (for better or worse), ever since the debut of ChatGPT and its successive versions (GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and GPT-4o) has recently announced that it has begun training a new flagship AI model.  The model is designed to replace the GPT-4 technology. It will power chatbots, create images, enhance search engines and function as digital assistant. The model is also expected to employ Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) – the ability of machines to perform tasks at par with human capabilities.

In parallel, Google announced new additions to its AI Model series – Gemini. It recently launched Gemini 1.5 Pro with a token window of 2 million units. The version supports approximately 35 languages and has improved reasoning and better image recognition. According to its CEO, Sundar Pichai, the model has the longest context window of any model, implying that it would be able to process more data compared to other similar AI models by its rivals. Notably, Gemini 1.5 was launched just one day after OpenAI launched the GPT- 4o version, underscoring the nature of the ongoing competition.

Elon Musk’s startup xAI is also working actively in this direction. The startup has raised USD 6 billion this week, increasing its valuation to USD 24 billion. The newly acquired funding would be used to create cross-cutting infrastructure, launch new products and expedite the creation of new technologies. Grok – an enhanced version of ChatGPT-4, is one of the prominent initiatives announced by xAI. As of now, the Chabot is only available to X (formerly Twitter) premium subscribers. The Chabot has access to real-time information via X, is designed to answer questions in a witty style and has a rather ‘rebellious’ nature. This week, Musk revealed his plans of powering the chatbot with a Supercomputer.

Meta is also striving to keep up with such ventures. Last week, a research paper was published by the Chameleon team quickly picked up by different media outlets. The research paper revealed a multimodal language model named ‘Chameleon’. The model’s claimed accuracy and ability to jointly reason over text and images equips it with new capabilities, setting it apart from the previous models.

While Microsoft has entered into a multi-billion dollar collaboration with OpenAI to accelerate breakthroughs in AI, it has been working on its own models as well. Earlier this month, Microsoft’s upcoming language learning model, MAI-1 was revealed. The model will be far larger than previously trained models by Microsoft and better positioned to compete with its rivals.

While we continue to be impressed by AI’s current level of integration in search engines and chatbots, more innovations are yet to unfold. In fact, the hybrid-AI search engines being used at the moment may evolve to a new level, offering more ‘human-like’ capabilities. Such fast-paced developments in the tech world come with certain implications. The expedited efforts and growing investments by tech giants reflect the increasingly high stakes vis-a-vis who gets to shape, impact, monopolise and ultimately control the future tech landscape. Furthermore, the surge of tech advancements manifests investor interest in this sector. However, this rapid progression also highlights a significant challenge: legal frameworks are struggling to keep pace with the speed of technological developments, leading to potential gaps in regulation and oversight. Europe’s ‘AI Act’, drafted by the European Commission in 2021, has  finally approved on 22nd May but will apply in 2026 in the 27-country bloc.

While these models may become capable of processing more data, upholding ethical concerns also remain a challenge. Notably, the duo leading OpenAI’s Super Alignment team (tasked to ensure that future AI models adhered to safety standards) – Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike parted ways with the company this month. The departure of key individuals raises concerns and suspicions vis-a-vis ethical aspects frequently raised over AI.  Interestingly, Elon Musk, one of the co-founders of OpenAI, has filed a case against the startup – claiming that it has deviated from its initial purpose of serving humanity’s interest. 

Since startups have already suggested using AGI, surveys indicate that 50% of AI experts believe AGI will be available by 2060. However, recent claims by different companies indicate that the technology might be available even earlier than predicted. This can have a pronounced impact across several sectors and society as a whole.

The last two weeks have provided a stark illustration of the fierce competition for AI supremacy, with tech giants relentlessly advancing the boundaries of what technology can accomplish. This period has been marked by groundbreaking cross-sector technologies, substantial financial investments, escalating innovation, and evolving expectations. As these systems develop and grow, they are impacting society notably. The legal and ethical frameworks urgently need to catch up to address these new realities. These advancements are poised to fundamentally transform how we interact with the internet and access information. Indeed, it is no longer that we use technology – we are living it.

Shaza Arif is a Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The News International. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »