Aviation Safety

Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity, or neglect,’

Captain A. G. Lamplugh

This precisely encapsulates the gravity of aviation safety or lack thereof. 

Pakistan’s aviation safety has long been a matter of debate due to its troubled safety record, including recurring incidents of airline crashes. However, it is encouraging to note that the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) safety audit results for Pakistan’s aviation sector based on their last mission to the country in 2021 reflect the state’s commitment to addressing aviation safety concerns. ICAO has also categorically recognised Pakistan’s efforts at addressing aviation safety concerns in recent years, especially in terms of the pilot licensing system of the state. Notwithstanding this, the audit results indicate that there are still some areas for improvement that need to be tackled through continued efforts. Resolving these concerns remains paramount not only from a moral standpoint but also from an economic point of view, as investing in aviation safety is indispensable to exploiting its economic potential.

ICAO also conducts regular aviation safety audits of member countries through its Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) to ensure their safety oversight obligations are being met. The programme assesses countries’ safety oversight capabilities in eight key areas, including ‘primary aviation legislation and civil aviation regulations’; ‘civil aviation organization’; ‘personnel licensing and training’; ‘aircraft operations’; ‘airworthiness of aircraft’; ‘aircraft accident and incident investigation’; ‘air navigation services’; and ‘aerodromes and ground aids.’ 

USOAP’s most recent audit results for Pakistan present a mixed picture. In four areas, including ‘aircraft operations’, ‘airworthiness of aircraft’, ‘aircraft accident and incident investigation’, and ‘aerodromes and ground aids’, Pakistan managed to surpass the global average. In fact, in ‘airworthiness’, Pakistan had a significantly high score of 94.5% against a global average of 83.2%. The scores for ‘airworthiness’ are based on the country’s degree of adherence to safety standards in areas such as aircraft’s engine and propeller design, structural design and construction, or equipment design. The scores for ‘aerodromes and ground aids’ are based on factors such as ground facilities (e.g., runway safety areas) or airport maintenance; the scores for ‘accident investigation’ are determined by the state’s ability to investigate the causes of a serious incident or aircraft accident, and the parameter of ‘operations’ assesses factors such as the type of aircraft, the crew’s operating skills, or the level of sophistication of the equipment carried on the aircraft. 

However, Pakistan could not meet the global average in the other four areas, including ‘legislation and regulations’, ‘civil aviation organization’, ‘licensing and training’, and ‘air navigation services.’ The parameter of ‘legislation and regulations’ assesses a country’s aviation laws, while the parameter of ‘civil aviation organization (CAO)’ assesses the effectiveness and capability of the country’s CAO system. Additionally, the scores for ‘licensing and training’ are based on factors such as the qualifications, training, or experience of the technical personnel; and the scores for ‘air navigation services’ are based on the availability of the air traffic control units or flight information centres that provide air traffic information or services.

Importantly, in legislation and regulations, Pakistan’s score of 50% was well below the global average of 76.4%; and in air navigation services, its score of 43.1% was well below the global average of 65.2%. According to the USAOP report, the general highlights of the issues identified in the legislation area include states’ lack of ability to establish comprehensive procedures to timely revise their primary aviation legislation or civil aviation regulations in accordance with the provision in the Annexes to the Chicago Convention; absence of an appropriate system for identifying and notifying the variances between the national regulations and practices and general standards and recommended practices; or issues with respect to establishing and implementing enforcement policies to ensure effective enforcement of the legislation and regulations, among others. Likewise, major concerns with respect to air navigation services included states’ inability to ensure the maintenance and periodic review of flight procedures, smooth search and rescue services, weak implementation of enforcement actions and formal surveillance programmes for air navigation service providers. 

Pakistan’s aviation sector has demonstrated great economic potential. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates that the country’s air transport sector, comprising the airlines and their supply chains, supports USS 2 billion of the country’s GDP, and the spending by foreign visitors supports another USD 1.3 billion, resulting in a total contribution of 1% to the country’s GDP. By addressing the identified shortcomings, this sector has the potential to become economically stronger.

To increase aviation’s economic contribution, Pakistan must continue to strengthen its aviation safety reputation by investing in all areas, including those where it has already managed to beat the global average. This can help boost the economy by expanding airlines’ customer base and tourism; prospects for securing more routes and destinations; avoiding the costs associated with accidents; and attracting investment in the country’s aviation sector. Beyond the potential economic benefits of addressing these concerns, it is essential that we recognise the immeasurable value of human life and approach this issue with the utmost care and attention. By prioritising safety in our aviation sector, we not only safeguard the lives of our citizens and visitors, but also demonstrate a commitment to our shared humanity and the highest moral ideals of progress and prosperity.

Zahra Niazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Pakistan Today. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »