01. Shaheer Ahmad-StarG-Geo-Pol-Oped thumbnail-March-2025-AP

Building data centres to power Artificial Intelligence (AI) payloads is a looming geopolitical test great powers are likely to contest. Within hours of returning to the White House, President Trump made a striking move by revoking the AI regulatory guardrails established by his predecessor, Joe Biden—an action that was both unsurprising yet remarkable in its swiftness. This was followed by the reveal of an ambitious tech initiative, Stargate—a USD 500 billion project aimed to establish virtual and physical infrastructure to power the next-generation AI technologies.

Flanked by OpenAI, Oracle, and Japanese Softbank, the Trump Administration has teamed up with the tech titans to lay down a web of data centres and cutting-edge computing infrastructure in mainland USA. The effort will be complemented by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) leading AI investor MGX, Microsoft, and Nvidia as technology partners. Significant government benefaction, particularly the use of presidential executive orders to bypass national development guidelines, underlines the status of Stargate as a part of national priority.  

Establishing infrastructure, particularly data centres, has become a pretext to sustain the global AI revolution. These digital behemoths are critical to cater the demands of AI and quantum computing.  As outlined in a McKinsey report last year, rapid advancements in AI is catalysing the global demand for data centres which is likely to triple by 2030.  So far, the US sits at commanding heights of housing cutting-edge data centres and computing capabilities, with its leading cloud giants Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google dominating the major market share. As of now, the United States hosts 5,381 data centres, accounting for 51% of the global data infrastructure. In this context, Stargate is considered the largest AI infrastructure project in history, designed to sustain US technological dominance in data centres.

Amidst the relentless march of technology, the ‘Stargate question’ reflects emerging technological trends in contemporary geopolitics. Considering its strategic utility, the project could be termed as a vital jigsaw piece that glues the Trump Administration and Silicon Valley together. Dominance in AI infrastructure will create a technological dependency of other states on the US, granting it political leverage through measures like sanctions and export control. Moreover, the project is emblematic of techno-political superiority, which will likely augment the US global AI standing by curbing the capital flow to Chinese-backed projects. Meanwhile, Trump’s establishment of Stargate as a private company indicates the intent to bypass the bureaucratic bottlenecks associated with a publicly funded project.

Despite the ambitious outlook, uncertainty remains about the financial viability of the project. Critics, including Elon Musk, have cast doubts on OpenAI’s capability to raise the promised investments. On the other hand, China’s DeepSeek-V3 presents an economical approach, as evidenced in the recent trailer of tumbling stocks of US AI giants. Moreover, significant investment in the project could lead to potential fiscal cuts in other crucial areas, including healthcare and education. While the project is a direct response to China’s rapid AI advancements, Trump’s approach to pressurise the European Union (EU) over technological regulations may cause bifurcation between the transatlantic alliance.

Similarly, the project also comes with a sizable threat of data centre espionage. Recently, damage to subsea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, including two subsea cables, C-Lion 1 and BCS East-West Interlink, by a Chinese-flagged cargo vessel has alarmed governments, implying that data centres may be the next target of sabotage attempts. Collaborating with foreign actors, including SoftBank and MGX, could also make the US vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, especially in the wake of a geopolitical conflict in South China Sea. Moreover, torpedoing Biden’s AI regulatory guardrails may encourage innovation, but it could lead to overlooking of ethical and safety standards, raising the threat of malicious use of AI and similar technologies.

Despite high hopes, political signaling, and geopolitical gimmickry, the Stargate project demands careful consideration in light of numerous structural challenges. While weighing its cost-effectiveness, the success of Stargate lies in AI regulation and oversight. Therefore, overcoming infrastructural challenges, financial logjams and devising AI governance is fundamental for effective functioning of the project.

AI infrastructure has become a centrepiece of great power competition. Polish political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski termed these elements ‘novel dimensions of power,’ where data, subsea, and undersea infrastructure sit as a fulcrum of global technological competition.  Stargate reflects Trump’s inward nationalist posture intended to build a robust bastion of technological infrastructure to shield its tech industry from outside effects. It is therefore important to recognise that behind Stargate’s ambitious push lies an undercurrent of revitalising American dominance under President Trump’s slogan of ‘Make America Great’. However, its success in shaping the future of a techno-polar world remains to be seen.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »