10

The 20th-century race for space dominance that was ignited during the Cold War has been given a renewed competitive push recently. Not only states but private companies are flexing their innovative muscles to make advancements into space.

The recent SpaceX Demo-2 launch represents a new milestone for the larger U.S. space program, as the Dragon capsule, with two NASA astronauts, docked with the International Space Station (ISS).

The flawless launch of the SpaceX mission to connect to the ISS will deny Russia the status of being the only country to ferry astronauts into space at short notice. The event comes as a challenge to the Russian Space Agency, Roscosmos, which had held a monopoly in ferrying humans into space.

In 2011, the U.S. halted spaceflight missions, leaving Russia as the leader for transporting humans into space. Russia has been able to capitalize on this opportunity. Not only financially but also diplomatically. The development and possession of a large number of Soyuz spacecraft enabled it to have a firm position in the negotiations regarding the ISS. Moreover, American reliance on Russian technology also acted as a propaganda tool for Russia.

Sergei Krikalev, Roscosmos executive director for crewed space programs, congratulated Elon Musk, and his team for this milestone achievement by stating, “The success of the mission will provide us with additional opportunities that will benefit the whole international programme.”

That said, it should be kept in mind that Dmitry Rogozin, the Russian Space Chief, has previously mocked the U.S. for lacking American manned-flight systems, after the U.S. decision to impose sanctions against Russia, including certain space industries.

Rogozin quipped that the U.S. would need to employ trampolines to launch astronauts into space in the future. However, the recent SpaceX launch has marked the resumption of U.S. spaceflights.

Russia has previously been able to derive hefty revenues by ferrying astronauts into space. In the likely scenario of SpaceX taking American astronauts into space, U.S. reliance on Russia would diminish.

That said, the annual budget of Roscosmos is around $2 billion and it is bound to suffer if it is deprived of the revenue from the U.S. which constitutes around $200 million.

Russia is anticipating an emergent rival in the space industry with SpaceX becoming the first private company to launch astronauts into orbit. Moreover, SpaceX has also set a low price for ferrying astronauts into space, as compared to Roscosmos.

While a seat in the Russian Soyuz costs NASA around $80 million, Elon Musk announced that SpaceX would be charging $60 million. In addition, SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets are far cheaper than the Russian Soyuz rockets. The cost factor would serve as an incentive for other states to transition back to American suppliers.

The Russian space industry failed to take the required precaution when it was losing the launch market under the miscalculation that its monopoly would last indefinitely.

However, over time, China and now SpaceX, are displacing Roscosmos in taking astronauts into space in future launches. In addition, the Russian space sector is also marred with corruption; multiple scandals have surfaced regarding the construction of the new Vostochny launch pad in the Far East.

Furthermore, very little effort has been devoted to upgrading the Soviet technology. According to Andrei Ionin, an expert at the Tsiolkovsky Space Academy, Russia needs to establish a government body, independent of main players of the space sector akin to the National Space Council being heralded by President Trump.

Amidst all this, the significance of private companies in the space sector has been brought forth. The states who are striving for robust space programs should encourage and facilitate private entities which can later serve them in augmenting their national space capabilities.

Boeing, another private company, is also aiming to have its own launch facility and expecting to fly its Starliner capsule with a NASA crew on board in 2021. In the future, the horizon of the activities of private companies can be extended beyond satellite launches, with the prospects of sending private astronauts into space, deployment of private space stations, and private extra-territorial missions.

In the future, a more intense race in space would be observed by roping in private companies. Russia has been quite wary of the privatization of space, yet the recent events are the illustration of the potentials of collaborating with the private sector.

The SpaceX Demo-2 mission might serve as a crucial leap for NASA but for Roscosmos it is a stern warning to revamp its space capabilities and expedite its efforts in the respective sector.

Shaza Arif is research associate at Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in International Policy Digest https://intpolicydigest.org/blog/spacex-demo-2-launch-implications-for-roscosmos/. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »