10

The 20th-century race for space dominance that was ignited during the Cold War has been given a renewed competitive push recently. Not only states but private companies are flexing their innovative muscles to make advancements into space.

The recent SpaceX Demo-2 launch represents a new milestone for the larger U.S. space program, as the Dragon capsule, with two NASA astronauts, docked with the International Space Station (ISS).

The flawless launch of the SpaceX mission to connect to the ISS will deny Russia the status of being the only country to ferry astronauts into space at short notice. The event comes as a challenge to the Russian Space Agency, Roscosmos, which had held a monopoly in ferrying humans into space.

In 2011, the U.S. halted spaceflight missions, leaving Russia as the leader for transporting humans into space. Russia has been able to capitalize on this opportunity. Not only financially but also diplomatically. The development and possession of a large number of Soyuz spacecraft enabled it to have a firm position in the negotiations regarding the ISS. Moreover, American reliance on Russian technology also acted as a propaganda tool for Russia.

Sergei Krikalev, Roscosmos executive director for crewed space programs, congratulated Elon Musk, and his team for this milestone achievement by stating, “The success of the mission will provide us with additional opportunities that will benefit the whole international programme.”

That said, it should be kept in mind that Dmitry Rogozin, the Russian Space Chief, has previously mocked the U.S. for lacking American manned-flight systems, after the U.S. decision to impose sanctions against Russia, including certain space industries.

Rogozin quipped that the U.S. would need to employ trampolines to launch astronauts into space in the future. However, the recent SpaceX launch has marked the resumption of U.S. spaceflights.

Russia has previously been able to derive hefty revenues by ferrying astronauts into space. In the likely scenario of SpaceX taking American astronauts into space, U.S. reliance on Russia would diminish.

That said, the annual budget of Roscosmos is around $2 billion and it is bound to suffer if it is deprived of the revenue from the U.S. which constitutes around $200 million.

Russia is anticipating an emergent rival in the space industry with SpaceX becoming the first private company to launch astronauts into orbit. Moreover, SpaceX has also set a low price for ferrying astronauts into space, as compared to Roscosmos.

While a seat in the Russian Soyuz costs NASA around $80 million, Elon Musk announced that SpaceX would be charging $60 million. In addition, SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets are far cheaper than the Russian Soyuz rockets. The cost factor would serve as an incentive for other states to transition back to American suppliers.

The Russian space industry failed to take the required precaution when it was losing the launch market under the miscalculation that its monopoly would last indefinitely.

However, over time, China and now SpaceX, are displacing Roscosmos in taking astronauts into space in future launches. In addition, the Russian space sector is also marred with corruption; multiple scandals have surfaced regarding the construction of the new Vostochny launch pad in the Far East.

Furthermore, very little effort has been devoted to upgrading the Soviet technology. According to Andrei Ionin, an expert at the Tsiolkovsky Space Academy, Russia needs to establish a government body, independent of main players of the space sector akin to the National Space Council being heralded by President Trump.

Amidst all this, the significance of private companies in the space sector has been brought forth. The states who are striving for robust space programs should encourage and facilitate private entities which can later serve them in augmenting their national space capabilities.

Boeing, another private company, is also aiming to have its own launch facility and expecting to fly its Starliner capsule with a NASA crew on board in 2021. In the future, the horizon of the activities of private companies can be extended beyond satellite launches, with the prospects of sending private astronauts into space, deployment of private space stations, and private extra-territorial missions.

In the future, a more intense race in space would be observed by roping in private companies. Russia has been quite wary of the privatization of space, yet the recent events are the illustration of the potentials of collaborating with the private sector.

The SpaceX Demo-2 mission might serve as a crucial leap for NASA but for Roscosmos it is a stern warning to revamp its space capabilities and expedite its efforts in the respective sector.

Shaza Arif is research associate at Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). This article was first published in International Policy Digest https://intpolicydigest.org/blog/spacex-demo-2-launch-implications-for-roscosmos/. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »