Social Media’s Role-Ujala-MDS

In this era of information warfare, rapid communication tools, such as Facebook, Skype, Text, Instagram, Linkedin, Twitter, and WhatsApp, are frequently exploited by adversaries for communication and data sharing. Oxford Internet Institute reported that these platforms empower various entities to manipulate public opinion, challenge opposing narratives, and spread deceptive information to achieve political objectives in foreign nations. UNESCO Digital Library explains that the algorithms implemented by social media platforms notably contribute to the propagation of extremist content. Such algorithms are crafted to emphasise engaging and contentious posts due to their ability to increase user interaction and advertisement revenue. 

As a result, inflammatory and divisive content often gains greater exposure compared to narratives endorsing peace and unity. This phenomenon has been evident in online interactions involving various stakeholders in Pakistan. It poses a threat to national and internal security as it can fuel tensions, exacerbate divisions, and potentially lead to unrest and instability within the country. Threats to peace can vary from minor public disturbances to widespread violence or even full-fledged insurrections. Internal security challenges can target a state’s citizens, its institutional structures, or its infrastructure. These challenges can manifest as minor crimes, organised criminal activities, political disturbances, industrial conflicts, or domestic terrorist acts. Additionally, external nations can pose threats to a country’s internal security by either directly engaging in or sponsoring acts of terrorism or rebellion, all without an official declaration of war.

Without appropriate legal management, social media risks disrupting the information landscape. The Arab Spring in the Middle East and Africa serves as an example, where platforms like Twitter and Facebook were primarily utilised to promote anti-state sentiments. Hence, in many contexts, especially in Pakistan as well, social media is increasingly viewed as a potential risk to national security and democracy. There have been 71.70 million social media users in Pakistan as of January 2023, according to Datareportal. This number represented 30.1% of the country’s population at that time, underscoring the significance of social media platforms in shaping political narratives through the rapid dissemination of information.

The News reported that FIA identified approximately 2,100 Twitter accounts as part of a disinformation campaign targeting state institutions with an aim to drive a wedge between the state and citizens. In such cases, efforts by Law Enforcement Agencies for national security are paramount. A primary reason for the increase in anti-state material on social media is the absence of stringent regulation and monitoring on these platforms. Due to minimal oversight, individuals with extremist views can spread their harmful ideologies while maintaining anonymity. Consequently, unverified narratives become prevalent without thorough fact-checking or validation. 

Various measures have been implemented to address online extremism in Pakistan. The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) established the Cyber Vigilance Division, which is playing a crucial role in monitoring and addressing extremist online behaviours. This Division works in tandem with technology firms and law enforcement to identify, eliminate, or restrict accounts that promote hate or incite violence. Furthermore, countering extremist ideologies involves crafting narratives that oppose such extremist beliefs. Additionally, it is essential to educate the public on the perils of online extremism. Initiatives that spotlight the misleading strategies of extremists can enable individuals to critically assess content on social media. Fostering media literacy among the population can lead to a society better equipped against external influences and radicalisation.

Meanwhile, collaboration among civil society groups, educational institutions, religious leaders, and influential individuals can help disseminate messages of peace, acceptance, and national cohesion via social media endeavours. A notable example of such collaboration occurred when leading Pakistani celebrities initiated the ‘United against Extremism’ campaign. Through impactful video narratives shared across various platforms, they emphasised the importance of rejecting polarising beliefs and celebrating the diversity that enriches Pakistan. These collective efforts serve as a testament to the potential for positive change in online spaces and the promotion of a more inclusive and harmonious society.

Ujala Siddiq is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »