08. Syed Ahmed Ali-Sil-China-Eco-Tech-Oped thumbnail-July-2025-APP

Warfare is no longer defined by traditional firepower, but by information in the form of satellites, fibre optics, and silicon chips. The modern battlefield demands weapons that are long-ranged, accurate, dynamic, and intelligent. These weapons are supported by tech ecosystems that provide essential services, making such capabilities a reality. For decades, the United States has dominated the technological ecosystem. This has enabled Washington to degrade the capabilities of its adversaries. However, as China’s ascendancy unfolds, the US finds its technological supremacy challenged. China’s burgeoning tech ecosystem is increasingly viewed as a viable alternative to American technology dependence, which is slowly shifting the global balance of power.

The Chinese military-industrial complex (MIC) has come a long way from self-sufficiency, to indigenisation, to becoming a major player in the arms market. Currently, 4 out of the 10 largest defence companies are Chinese. These companies are producing equipment like VT-4 main battle tanks, J-20 stealth fighter jets, Dong Feng (DF-21D / DF-26) anti-ship ballistic missiles, and the HQ-9 (Hong Qi) air defence system. China also has the largest shipbuilding industry, whose capacity is 230 times larger than the US. However, despite the impressive might of the Chinese MIC, only a handful of states import its products. 61% of China’s total arms exports go to a single country: Pakistan.

Pakistan’s regional security challenges have compelled it to import arms from China and collaborate on projects like the JF‑17. Recent deployment of the Chinese J‑10C under Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos demonstrated the platform’s combat effectiveness, rattling the international arms market and proving that Chinese weaponry can rival Western systems. This growing credibility of Chinese weapons has enabled the country to penetrate new markets. Iran has recently shown interest in purchasing Chinese J-10Cs in an attempt to rebuild its air force and reduce dependence on Western weapons systems.

Modern weapon systems, such as missiles, rely on satellite systems for navigation and situational awareness. For much of the late 20th Century, most military powers were vulnerable to US satellite jamming capabilities due to their reliance on GPS (Global Positioning System). China experienced this firsthand when GPS interference caused one of its ballistic missiles to overshoot during the third Taiwan Strait Crisis. Understanding their vulnerability, the Chinese started their own global navigation project in 1994 called ‘BeiDou’. China launched its first BeiDou satellites in 2000, which provided navigation services exclusively to the mainland. In 2022, the constellation expanded to 45 satellites, 30 of which are third-generation satellites that serve over 1.1 billion people. 

BeiDou has become an alternative navigation system to the GPS. China currently shares military-grade access to its BeiDou satellite navigation system with Pakistan, Iran and Russia. Iran in particular, due to its hostility towards Israel, is vulnerable to the US global navigation system. To secure itself, Iran signed an agreement in 2021 to gain military grade access to BeiDou.  As a result, in April 2024, Iranian missiles saw a remarkable improvement in their accuracy landing within metres of their Israeli target. States are rushing towards the BeiDou, not only because of its technological sophistication but because it represents strategic autonomy from Washington.

China has not only established an independent technological ecosystem in space but has also mirrored this approach on land by developing a self-reliant supply chain for rare earth minerals. It dominates the industry: extracts 70% of global rare earth minerals, refines 85% of them, and manufactures 90% of rare earth magnets. This is particularly significant as these minerals are essential for production of modern weapons like hypersonic missiles, F-35’s, and nuclear submarines.

With the ongoing trade-tariff war between Washington and Beijing, the Chinese government imposed export control restrictions on rare earth minerals in April. The Chinese government has a wide arsenal of tools to challenge the White House in this trade war, such as licensing restrictions, tariffs, export quotas, or outright bans. Such measures represent a significant risk to US national security, as these policies may jeopardise its MIC supply chain. This can be particularly troubling for the US as it effectively means that Washington and its allies will not be able engage in long-drawn-out conflicts that deplete their arsenal.

The Chinese military-industrial complex, satellite system and rare earth minerals offer a viable route of strategic autonomy from the US tech ecosystem. It gives states the liberty to pursue policies that Washington frowns upon. China, with a dominant hold over the rare earth mineral industry, has a secure supply line for its high-tech industry. This allows Beijing to outproduce the US and supply its allies with critical weapon systems. The only constraints China faces are a smaller customer base and establishing credibility at par with US weapon systems. With the recent battlefield success of Chinese systems such as PL-15 and BeiDou, this gap is closing fast.

Syed Ahmed Ali is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), in Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »