Role of Air Power

The 1965 War between India and Pakistan set the pace of air battles in South Asia with professional and heroic performance of Pakistan Air Force pilots. All personnel of its flying, technical and other branches displayed professional competence, leadership, and courage in the discharge of their responsibilities. The PAF, despite its numerical inferiority, emerged as a winner against a three times larger adversary. PAF’s initial onslaught in which it destroyed four IAF Gnats, put the IAF on the defensive forcing her to ground all 130 Vampire aircraft. Ascendency gained right at the beginning continued till end of the war and helped Pakistan’s land forces in accomplishment of their offensive and defensive operations.

During the war, PAF aviators displayed very high standards of professionalism, exemplary leadership, and innovative skills.  Air Marshal Nur Khan, the then Commander-in-Chief of the PAF, personally undertook aerial reconnaissance of the border areas to assess the Indian preparedness and intent. Squadron Leader Sarfraz Rafiqui despite his guns being jammed, did not return back, and continued to provide cover to his formation members and embraced shahadat (martyrdom). MM Alam set a world record by shooting down 5 IAF Indian aircraft in a short and quick engagement. PAF’s transport fleet converted and employed its C-130 aircraft for night bombing to partially offset IAF’s numerical superiority. PAF’s B-57 bomber aircraft flew as deep as Agra to create deterrence. Looking at the entire war, we find no dearth of heroic acts by PAF pilots.

The courage, professionalism and leadership displayed by the PAF aviators, continues to guide PAF’s successive generations. This has enabled PAF in discharge of its responsibilities professionally and with honour.

PAF’s performance in the 1971 War was equally commendable. The only PAF squadron based in Dacca continued to inflict losses on the IAF even with damaged runway and other allied facilities. The operations ceased only when the runway became unusable. More recently, PAF displayed its exemplary professionalism and planning skills when it responded to IAF’s sneak night attack with a broad daylight operation and shot down two IAF aircraft. Even during 2001/2002 stand-off and 2008 escalation in the aftermath of Mumbai attacks, PAF’s preparedness was instrumental in deterring India from taking any aggressive steps. PAF also has the credit of shooting down Israeli and Soviet aircraft without incurring any loss.

IAF’s repetitive failures over the years highlight weaknesses in her training, developmental and modernisation strategy as well as lack of understanding employment of the force. This was proven by late General Bipin Rawat’s comments relegating IAF to a supporting arm like artillery.

In the aftermath of IAF’s mediocre performance on 27February 2019, and later using border skirmishes with China to exploit US fears of Chinese rise, the Indian government supported IAF for hastened acquisitions of weapon systems from wherever available and at whatever cost.  These hurried acquisition include Rafale fighters from France, S-400 Ballistic Missile Defence System from Russia, and many other systems from multiple other sources. IAF also went on a spree for upgradation of existing systems. Recently inducted indigenous aircraft carrier in the Indian navy further increases India’s air power employment options against Pakistan.

Indian government has taken full advantage of US fears of Chinese rise to extract diplomatic, technological and defence equipment support from Washington. The US is compelled to support India despite Indian defence acquisitions from sanctioned entities as well as BJP’s human rights violations. Indian inclusion in the two Quads and agreements such a BECA and LEMOA etc. will be greatly helpful to Indian Armed Forces during any future wars. Indigenous work as well as technological support from other countries, is also enabling their capability of utilising emerging technologies such as AI, cyber, drones and hypersonic missiles etc.

Indian military acquisitions in general and IAF acquisitions especially when viewed in the context of US and Western technological support are bound to disturb the balance of power and embolden the hardliner regime in New Delhi. This will result in both, an arms race as well as create strategic stability dilemma in a volatile region with three nuclear armed states.

The modern world is averse to military conflicts, especially between nuclear rivals. India’s emphasis on modernising the IAF is also suggestive of future military conflicts in the South Asian region, which are likely to be short, intense and destruction oriented, necessitating the lead role as well as greater employment of air power. This would require doctrinal and strategic shifts.

PAF’s current leadership is cognizant of the Indian acquisitions as well as possible conflict scenarios. It has, however, chosen to avoid an arms race. PAF leadership instead, took a stock of the evolving situation and assessed the future aerial warfare in the subcontinent. Based on its assessment of future requirements, it opted to reorganise the air force, adapt to changing training requirements and opted for bare minimum acquisitions. The only new induction in recent years is a squadron of J-10C aircraft. Considering the role emerging technologies would play in future conflicts, PAF leadership has also decided to indigenously develop these technologies. PAF, keeping up with its traditions and professional performance, will surely produce innovative employment options to effectively respond to any challenges in the future.

Air Marshal M Ashfaque Arain (Retd) is Advisor to Chief of the Air Staff on CASS Affairs and is also Director of the Emerging Technologies programme at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »