CTD4-696x378

Since the War on Terror, Pakistan has lost more than 83,000 lives and borne economic losses of more than USD126 billion. To crumble terrorism, Pakistan decided to conduct internal military operations following which there was a significant decline in this menace. According to the National Counter Terrorism Authority data, there was a constant decline in terrorism- related incidents across Pakistan after Operation Zarb-e-Azb and launch of the National Action Plan (NAP). However, there has been a sudden increase of 42% in terrorism incidents since 2021. Such an alarming increase needs serious attention to identify the loopholes in Pakistan’s existing counterterrorism strategy and come up with more robust measures to tackle this issue.

One primary reason for such a spike could be regional politics in play that are beyond the state’s control, but which have domestic fallout. For instance, the hasty US withdrawal from Afghanistan. This unplanned withdrawal in 2021 provided an opportunity to various terrorist groups in Afghanistan for instance the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), to re-organise and re-launch their terrorist activities against Pakistan. The attack in Peshawar in Kocha Risaldar is one evidence which cost the nation 64 lives in a single blast. It must be noted that 207 attacks took place in 2021 alone, out of which 128 attacks were carried out by TTP and Islamic State Khorasan (ISK). Some media reports have revealed that the suicide bomber, who killed 64 people in Peshawar, was an Afghan refugee who returned to Pakistan from Afghanistan to carry out this particular attack. Therefore, beside engagement with Afghanistan as a brotherly Muslim country, Pakistan will have to devise a strategy to deal with the overflow of terrorism from across the border.

Kinetic operations are a useful tool to wipe out terrorism from society. Pakistan was able to reduce terrorism from its soil by bringing down the number of such incidents from 2061 in 2010 to 146 by 2020. However, there is still a long way to go for Pakistan to fill the gap in this domain. Pakistan will have to work towards ‘National Cohesion’ in order to reduce internal friction in society. Moreover, in order to sustain its counterterrorism strategies and to capitalise on its achievement, Pakistan needs to build resilience in its society by developing soft power along with the kinetic operations.

Along with building soft power, there is a need to bring further clarity in the definition of terrorism in domestic laws. Pakistan is currently using the definition provided under Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) of 1997. However, a major issue with this definition is its limited scope and misuse for multiple other criminal offences which are not categorised as an act of terrorism. For instance, the term ‘kidnapping for ransom’ in ATA 1997 raises an important question whether a crime committed under any kind of personal motivation and benefit could be charged under terrorism laws. This further raises the question on efficacy of the existing definition of terrorism in the legal framework and needs immediate revision specifically given the multidimensional scope of terrorist threats emanating within society.

The recent focus on Non-Traditional Security Threats (NTSTs) in the National Security Policy, 2022-26 is a welcome step. In this regard, there is a dire need to adopt a more balanced strategy to neutralise traditional and non- traditional threats to Pakistan’s national security.

In academia, a mixed-method approach or ‘Multimethodology’ is often preferred in order to make research more authentic and valid. Perhaps, to devise a strategy against terrorism and extremism in Pakistan, a similar approach could be the way forward. Such an approach would mean that besides kinetic operations, Pakistan should use a mix of internal soft power by working extensively on national cohesion and by refining the existing legal framework on terrorism. A mix of hard and soft power, in accordance with the challenges faced by the nation, could be helpful in reducing the threats emerging within society and ensure its survival.

Asad Ullah Khan is a Senior Researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source:  Associated Press of Pakistan 2021. “Pakistan counter terrorism strategy showing positive results” Associated Press of Pakistan, 10 August 2021.  https://www.app.com.pk/national/pakistan-counter-terrorism-strategy-showing-positive-results/ 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »