02. Shaheer Ahmad-Rai-Ste-Mis-Oped thumbnail-June-2025-AP

A great deal of world politics is fundamental struggle, but it is also a struggle that has to be waged intelligently. Zbigniew Brzezinski’s observation on hardcore geopolitics resurfaced afresh after the April-May 2025 intense military crisis between India and Pakistan. India’s Operation Sindoor launched against Pakistan, was met with an ironclad response, resulting in the downing of five Indian aircraft, including three French-origin Rafales. A day later, Pakistan hit back through a large-scale retaliatory strike, Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos, against a series of Indian military targets.   In retrospect, the four-day military showdown witnessed a decisive role of beyond-visual-range (BVR) missiles, surface-to-air missiles (SAM) systems, and long-range artillery in striking targets with pinpoint accuracy.

During the military exchanges, Pakistan’s indigenously developed and Chinese-origin weapons remained as an operational mainstay for Pakistan against the Russian and Western weaponry in India’s arsenal. These weapons provided Pakistan a higher degree of interoperability to edge out the numerically superior Indian Air Force (IAF) in conflict. Most notably, the J-10C Vigorous Dragon gained traction as it provided the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) with ‘first shoot’ capability against the IAF. The aircraft’s sophisticated detection, tracking, and targeting systems shrank the opponent’s response window, hence denying it freedom to operate in the air.

Amidst the crisis, the PL-15—a long-range BVR missile employed on J-10C gained widespread attention due to its role in bringing down Rafale aircraft. Developed by China’s Airborne Missile Academy, the PL-15 is regarded as an analog to the US AIM-120 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile and European-made Meteor. Its radar homing design and estimated range of more than 200 km make it accurate for target tracking and resilient to electronic countermeasures. The first-ever use of PL-15 provided defence analysts a rare glimpse of the missile’s potency in real-time combat.

In conjunction with these assets, Pakistan has deployed long-range SAM systems to fortify its skies against aerial intruders. Among them, the HQ-9P systems managed to intercept the incoming missiles and deter the IAF from hitting critical nodes of command and control structures.

Concomitantly, long-range artillery’s overwhelming power was seen in neutralising ground targets and providing support and defensive fire to ground formations. Reports suggested that Pakistan used its precision-guided long-range multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) Fatah-I and II against a multitude of target vectors, including the adversary’s airfields, storage sites, and ground positions. It is widely believed that the Fatah-I successfully knocked out the Beas BrahMos storage site in Indian Punjab. Similarly, South China Morning Post reported the possible use of the SH-15—a 155mm self-propelled howitzer to hit military headquarters, artillery positions, and logistics sites.

While damage assessments are underway, the episode has reshaped the dynamics of conflict in the region toward precision-strike warfare; barrages from standoff distance that inflict cascading tolls on both sides. Moreover, the primacy of data links and network systems has been pivotal in guiding the long-range weaponry to precision. Pakistan’s ability to integrate ground-based radars, fighter aircraft, and airborne early warning and control systems (AEW&C) enabled it to remain ahead of the curve in the conflict.

Furthermore, the standoff also highlighted the precedence of network-centric systems over traditional firepower systems. From ground systems locking the targets to fighter jets firing the missiles from standoff distances, and finally AWACS seamlessly supervising the munitions to hit with pinpoint accuracy, demonstrates that mere firepower cannot let alone be decisive in the conflict. Instead, it has to be combined with the network and intelligent systems. Thus, this BVR capability has proved to be a game changer in modern aerial combat.

In retrospect, military confrontations today have evolved from mere firepower exchanges to achieve network-centric supremacy. Rather than simple acquisition and shopping for advanced systems, turbocharging network integration, data link unification, and standardising logistics would be integral to future warfare. Relatedly, the crisis also demonstrated the worth of maintaining peacetime operational readiness to uphold a credible deterrence envelope.

The brief aerial and ground exchange between two archrivals demonstrated the primacy of long-range BVR systems in future warfare. The multi-domain operations conducted by the PAF tactically handicapped the numerical ascendancy of the IAF. Furthermore, the preeminence of next-generation weapons demonstrated Pakistan’s upper hand in superior tactics, asset deployment, and operational readiness.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »