US Dollars

Share this article


The hegemonic role of the US dollar in international trade and commerce is the result of massive upheaval during the early 20th century that culminated in the destruction of most of Europe as well as much of Asia during World War 2. In the 70 years that have since elapsed, however, significant economic growth has occurred around the world, and whereas the US economy accounted for 50% of global GDP as of 1946, today it is closer to 23% and shrinking. Yet there has been a tremendous acceleration over the past year to that otherwise gradual trend of “de-dollarization,” and in no small part is this attributable to the war in Ukraine and the weaponization of the USD against Russia, although other factors such as the poor performance of the US during Covid-19 and the terrible monetary policy of the US Fed also play a role. As a result, we seem to be witnessing an accelerated pace of the “de-dollarization” trend and the onset of a more multipolar economic equilibrium in the world.

Some recent examples illustrate this acceleration. Saudi Arabia and China have come to an understanding towards a “petroyuan” trade that facilitates transactions between the world’s largest energy exporter and energy importer. China and Brazil have signaled the intention of moving away from the dollar towards local currency transactions. France and China have recently settled LNG transactions in Yuan. ASEAN countries have announced a shift away from major currencies including the USD, EUR, and Yen. Several countries are now requesting membership of the BRICS bloc, while China has been instrumental in brokering a thaw between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Russia and China are gravitating their economies towards one another, and one third of its reserves are held in renminbi. At the same time, Russia has created alternate agreements with various countries including Iran, India, and China to circumvent the vast blanket of sanctions imposed on it after its brutal invasion.

The narrative of de-dollarization has also taken root in political discourse within the United States, with some arguing that it is a good thing and a natural process of the US prioritizing its own national interests above that of a subsidized and dispersed empire that doesn’t pull its own weight. After all, the American dollar’s “exorbitant privilege” has meant that, to satiate global demand, the US has had to print more dollars than it would require for its own needs, keeping it in a position of running deficits in perpetuity, at the same time that the provision of its security umbrella in many parts of the globe has meant that it has subsidized the development of other countries which have not had to pay for military upkeep.

However, many view de-dollarization as a sign of an empire in decline, and see the receding prominence of the dollar seems to them damning evidence of how far American power has dwindled. After all, if the dollar is being substituted for other currencies in international trade, it implies that American financial influence has waned and other poles of economic power are emergent that can conduct their own trade and investment policies without regard to US interests. De-dollarization also diminishes the US’s ability to impose punitive economic measures including sanctions, thus reducing the toolkit through which it can exert power over the rest of the world. This we-have-fallen perception is increasingly prominent in American discourse and is the linchpin of narratives posited by disruptive political forces such as the Donald Trump supporter base.

There is some truth to both viewpoints. While it is true that American financial power is reduced by de-dollarization, it is also true that the dollar’s hegemony has been an exorbitant privilege that in itself has sowed the seeds of American decline through deficits and through spending on the maintenance of the empire. But America’s decline in terms of the dollar’s ubiquity does not mean that America itself must decline. It must address structural issues within America itself, including rampant inequality, excess military spending, investment in infrastructure, social protections & healthcare, judicial performance, and primary education. These were the levers of America’s development in the first place, and they are also the typical recommendations that American pundits make to Third World countries. Now those countries can recommend the same best practices to America.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is Advisor (Economic Affairs and National Development) at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

18th Lok Sabha Polls: Islamophobia and Electoral Partisanship

The Indian political horizon is in a frenzy with the ongoing 18th Lok Sabha polls. Voting for the multi-phase elections started on 19th April  and will span over six weeks, with results scheduled to be announced on 4th June. This election is primarily between the two main alliances: Narendra Modi’s BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and Congress-led 28-party opposition alliance, Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA).


Read More »

East or West? Who Will Rule the 5th Industrial Revolution?  

The world economy saw a ‘great divergence’ as a result of the first two Industrial Revolutions (IR-1 and IR-2) between 1750 and 1950 AD. The economic shift occurred from East to West as a result of industrial development by Western European nations led by Great Britain. The key to their success was the use of then-new technologies like steam power, mechanisation, automobiles, railways, telegraphs or electricity at every level of industrialisation


Read More »

Indigenisation of Drones: A Security Imperative for Pakistan

For any state, it is of paramount importance how it guarantees national security. This can be ensured through the use or threat of use of force and also mobilising its defence sector in times of conflict and war. In other words, it revolves around the defence capabilities that allow a state to carry out fundamental functions including ‘preventing, deterring, coercing and countering national security threats’.


Read More »

Stay Connected

Follow and Subscribe

Join Our Newsletter
And get notified everytime we publish new content.


Developed By Team CASSTT

Contact CASS

CASS (Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies), Old Airport Road, Islamabad
+92 51 5405011

All views and opinions expressed or implied are those of the authors/speakers/internal and external scholars and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of CASS.