10. Haider Ali-Pak-Til-CAR-Oped thumbnail-April-2025-AP

From the ancient silk routes to modern trade corridors, Pakistan and Uzbekistan are forging a new path for regional connectivity – one strategic handshake at a time. Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s recent visit to Uzbekistan was characterised by a landmark trade agreement signed by both nations to expand bilateral trade to USD 2 billion. This development builds on earlier engagements and is expected to unlock new opportunities for cooperation in trade and connectivity. It follows the ratification of the Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) in 2023, which seeks to increase annual bilateral trade to USD 1 billion by reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers on specified goods.

Leaders from both nations reaffirmed their commitment to advancing the Trans-Afghan Connectivity Project, which aims to establish vital trade links between South and Central Asia via Afghanistan. As part of this broader initiative, the Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (UAP) railway project was finalised in July 2023 to strengthen regional multilateral trade. The proposed rail corridor, spanning 760 kilometres, will begin in Termez, Uzbekistan, pass through Mazar-i-Sharif, and terminate at Kharlachi in Pakistan’s Kurram District.

International collaborators such as Qatar have expressed willingness to provide financial to the project, where as, China has proposed to finance the initiative as part of its Belt and Road Initiative. Nevertheless, the undertaking faces financial constraints with projected costs estimated between USD 4 to 6 billion. Despite all the cost, outcomes of the PTA seem promising as bilateral trade has expanded elevenfold since 2017. Although modest, the total trade volume between the countries now stands at USD 400 million, a significant jump from USD 66 million in 2018. The Intergovernmental Commission on Economic Cooperation meeting, held in Tashkent last year, increased the number of agreed items under the PTA from 17 to 100, aiming to boost bilateral commerce. 

The recent trade agreements and connectivity projects align closely with Uzbekistan’s strategic vision to diversify its trade portfolio. While growth with traditional partners remains important, Tashkent is actively seeking to expand its export horizons beyond established markets. Geopolitical imperatives further compel Uzbekistan to invest in broader regional linkages, and deeper trade integration with South Asia represents a mutually beneficial opportunity. Recognising this, Uzbekistan spearheaded a United Nations resolution on connectivity between South and Central Asia, which was unanimously adopted by the UN General Assembly and co-authored by Pakistan and other Central Asian republics. For Uzbekistan, these initiatives are not merely diplomatic gestures: they signal a deliberate shift towards reshaping the regional trade architecture.

Pakistan has long been viewed as the most suitable route to Central Asia, and its viability is undeniable. Moreover, it provides a window for Pakistan to tap into the Eurasian trade corridors, an opportunity the country had not been able to undertake thus far. The lack of regional security has eroded Pakistan’s geostrategic advantage. Alongside fiscal limitations, the prevailing security environment, particularly in Afghanistan, which serves as a central transit corridor, continues to pose challenges to the advancement of regional connectivity initiatives. At the same time, a strategic window has opened for Pakistan to strengthen ties with Central Asia, especially as India’s investment in the Chabahar Port faces uncertainty following renewed US sanctions under President Trump. In this context, both Pakistan and Uzbekistan have called on the Taliban to take decisive action against terrorism to ensure a secure environment for trade and commerce. Cross-border militancy has already led to sporadic disruptions in inter-state transit, including the suspension of key border crossings, undermining emerging trade relations. For Pakistan, this moment presents a rare opportunity to expand its regional trade footprint. However, if the initiative falters, there is a real risk that evolving trade routes may bypass Pakistan altogether, leaving it isolated from the region’s economic realignment.

Uzbekistan’s reliance on Afghanistan as a transit route makes peace in the country both a regional imperative and an economic opportunity. Pakistan’s offer of access to Gwadar and Karachi ports presents the shortest path to the sea for Central Asia, but this potential hinges on stability in Afghanistan. This moment offers a rare chance for economic convergence beyond great power politics, one that requires aligning security and trade through bilateral and multilateral cooperation, recognising that the two are inseparable.

Haider Ali Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »