10. Haider Ali-Pak-Til-CAR-Oped thumbnail-April-2025-AP

From the ancient silk routes to modern trade corridors, Pakistan and Uzbekistan are forging a new path for regional connectivity – one strategic handshake at a time. Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s recent visit to Uzbekistan was characterised by a landmark trade agreement signed by both nations to expand bilateral trade to USD 2 billion. This development builds on earlier engagements and is expected to unlock new opportunities for cooperation in trade and connectivity. It follows the ratification of the Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) in 2023, which seeks to increase annual bilateral trade to USD 1 billion by reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers on specified goods.

Leaders from both nations reaffirmed their commitment to advancing the Trans-Afghan Connectivity Project, which aims to establish vital trade links between South and Central Asia via Afghanistan. As part of this broader initiative, the Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (UAP) railway project was finalised in July 2023 to strengthen regional multilateral trade. The proposed rail corridor, spanning 760 kilometres, will begin in Termez, Uzbekistan, pass through Mazar-i-Sharif, and terminate at Kharlachi in Pakistan’s Kurram District.

International collaborators such as Qatar have expressed willingness to provide financial to the project, where as, China has proposed to finance the initiative as part of its Belt and Road Initiative. Nevertheless, the undertaking faces financial constraints with projected costs estimated between USD 4 to 6 billion. Despite all the cost, outcomes of the PTA seem promising as bilateral trade has expanded elevenfold since 2017. Although modest, the total trade volume between the countries now stands at USD 400 million, a significant jump from USD 66 million in 2018. The Intergovernmental Commission on Economic Cooperation meeting, held in Tashkent last year, increased the number of agreed items under the PTA from 17 to 100, aiming to boost bilateral commerce. 

The recent trade agreements and connectivity projects align closely with Uzbekistan’s strategic vision to diversify its trade portfolio. While growth with traditional partners remains important, Tashkent is actively seeking to expand its export horizons beyond established markets. Geopolitical imperatives further compel Uzbekistan to invest in broader regional linkages, and deeper trade integration with South Asia represents a mutually beneficial opportunity. Recognising this, Uzbekistan spearheaded a United Nations resolution on connectivity between South and Central Asia, which was unanimously adopted by the UN General Assembly and co-authored by Pakistan and other Central Asian republics. For Uzbekistan, these initiatives are not merely diplomatic gestures: they signal a deliberate shift towards reshaping the regional trade architecture.

Pakistan has long been viewed as the most suitable route to Central Asia, and its viability is undeniable. Moreover, it provides a window for Pakistan to tap into the Eurasian trade corridors, an opportunity the country had not been able to undertake thus far. The lack of regional security has eroded Pakistan’s geostrategic advantage. Alongside fiscal limitations, the prevailing security environment, particularly in Afghanistan, which serves as a central transit corridor, continues to pose challenges to the advancement of regional connectivity initiatives. At the same time, a strategic window has opened for Pakistan to strengthen ties with Central Asia, especially as India’s investment in the Chabahar Port faces uncertainty following renewed US sanctions under President Trump. In this context, both Pakistan and Uzbekistan have called on the Taliban to take decisive action against terrorism to ensure a secure environment for trade and commerce. Cross-border militancy has already led to sporadic disruptions in inter-state transit, including the suspension of key border crossings, undermining emerging trade relations. For Pakistan, this moment presents a rare opportunity to expand its regional trade footprint. However, if the initiative falters, there is a real risk that evolving trade routes may bypass Pakistan altogether, leaving it isolated from the region’s economic realignment.

Uzbekistan’s reliance on Afghanistan as a transit route makes peace in the country both a regional imperative and an economic opportunity. Pakistan’s offer of access to Gwadar and Karachi ports presents the shortest path to the sea for Central Asia, but this potential hinges on stability in Afghanistan. This moment offers a rare chance for economic convergence beyond great power politics, one that requires aligning security and trade through bilateral and multilateral cooperation, recognising that the two are inseparable.

Haider Ali Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »