Ujala S Khan-DigitalEducation-MDS

With the global world adapting rapidly to digitalisation, the education sector is also transforming by inculcating various digital practices for making knowledge accessible and consequently bridging the educational access divide between different socioeconomic groups. Governments around the world have created favourable policy environments to facilitate such transformations. Pakistan, in this regard, has been declared as a country with the least favourable policy environment when compared to other states by the Asian Development Bank’s 2023 ‘Digital Education Readiness Framework Report’. This evaluation is a cause of concern given that such a situation will not only widen the gaps in existing inequalities but also lead to the loss of massive learning opportunities required to create skilled labour in a technology-driven world.

The ADB report is based on various indicators which need improvement in Pakistan to create a viable environment for digital education. Among these indicators, five major macro-level indicators are the most significant – physical and digital infrastructure; readiness of schools and teachers; readiness of students and parents; national-level policy and/or governance; and the presence of digital education service providers.

Pakistan has 36% internet penetration rate, which indicates that about two third of the population does not have access to the internet. As per the ADB report, internet quality in Pakistan is below-par as compared to the report’s model country Uzbekistan with 70.4% internet penetration rate. The average internet speed in Pakistan is 10.28 Mbps, whereas in Uzbekistan, the average speed is 36.23Mbps,  which implies that domestic internet connectivity is not fast and stable for online pedagogy. The ICT infrastructure, such as educational institutes’ WiFi access, Learning Management System (LMS) platforms, IT-trained teachers, and fully functional computer labs remains insufficient given the expense involved. Television is the only most widely accessible medium in Pakistan, with a 62.8% household coverage rate which is still low when compared to regional countries, for instance Uzbekistan has 100% household television access.

Such infrastructure gaps largely persist due to lapses in the policy environment for digital education. For instance, the framework at the national level for funding, curriculum and performance management in the digital space, teacher training, and access to ICTs determines the readiness for digital education. While Pakistan’s National Education Policy 2017–2025 does focus on the provision of access to ICT in schools, it does not explicitly address how such devices will be accessed. Also, there is an absence of a digitalised curriculum and digital training of teachers pre-service and in-service in Pakistan.

In this regard, Pakistan has taken a conducive step called ‘TeleSchool’. This platform broadcasts material on various subjects aligned with the provincial curricula. This initiative has been a success so far in digital learning as 7-8 million children were introduced to TeleSchools in its introductory phase in 2020 according to Gallup. Around 47% rural respondents were found in the survey to be satisfied with the transmission as compared to 46% urban respondents.

The need for placing required infrastructure and implementation of a good policy directed towards achieving digital learning at a broader scale needs to go hand in hand with teacher trainings in educational institutions. Teachers’ capacity in EdTech; their training in digital learning; proportion of teachers with access to devices and the internet; and government IT support determine the level of digital teaching readiness within a country. In Pakistan, the focus on teacher training in ICT skills remains low, and teachers predominantly rely on social media like WhatsApp to interact with students. Digital education content creation also remains basic in the form of documents and presentations. Internet quality is also not suitable for downloading heavier files except for teachers working in higher education. Schools continue to remain paper-dependent for data collection and analysis of pedagogical content and the absence of concrete IT support further acts as a push for this system.

Likewise, the digital capability of students and their access to connectivity, devices, and curriculum content measures digital readiness at their level. According to the ADB, while a majority of students are proficient in digital skills from basic to advanced ones, including the efficient use of LMS systems; the problem lies in accessibility of devices. Only 43% students have access to computers or laptops at home. In Pakistan, students are mostly self-taught in digital tools, which demonstrates their interest in education technology necessary for digital learning. Hence, government initiatives towards making digital education accessible will always be welcomed by the masses.

In doing so, the government can also rely on educational technology solutions such as testing platforms, teacher platforms, and digital hubs (Google Classroom, Edubuntu, and Edmodo) hosting content such as those developed by private EdTech companies. For instance, in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Philippines, the education sector has partnered with these EdTech platforms and have managed to obtain high ranking in the digital readiness scale in the region. Pakistan can also create a medium to high-tech learning environment through Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) by providing private companies with incentives to design such solutions. However, to create a viable domestic environment for digital learning, the approach should be holistic. An approach that will not only address the student-teacher access to devices, but also focus on digital education delivery training modules within the pedagogy.

Ujala Siddiq Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at: [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The West: The History of an Idea

The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.

Read More »

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »