thumbnail_15027737723_cc0592cdb1_o

Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

News reports about backdoor contacts between Pakistan and India have recently emerged and the flexibility in statements by the government officials of the two states also suggest the same.

According to media,United Arab Emirates (UAE) is playing a leading role to bring the two nuclear-armed states- India and Pakistan to the negotiation table.The news was also confirmed by Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi. However, the main power behind the curtain is believed to be the United States of America.

Prime Minister Imran Khan, at a recent rally in Kashmir said that “for the sake of peace in South Asia, we should build-up cordial relations and India should make a possible move by retracting her actions leading up to the revocation of Article 370/35A.” Similarly, during the Islamabad Security Dialogue, Army Chief General Bajwa called for better Pakistan-India relations and said that both countries should “bury the past and move forward”. Reciprocally, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi sent warm wishes to PM Imran Khan for his recovery from COVID-19. With this positivity in the air, hopes for better peace in the region have increased.

Kashmir is the most important issue between the two states but apart from that, there are multiple bilateral issues including Siachen, Indian violations of the Indus Waters Treaty, Sir Creek etc. However, India has always in the past tried to steer the negotiations away from these core issues and rather focus on people-to-people contact, resumption of Afghan transit trade, bilateral trade or have made negotiations conditional to Pakistan’s compliance to Indian demands of addressing terrorism.

One of the possible reasons behind the current flexibility of the Modi-led BJP government in terms of negotiations is to regain the soft image of India that has been jeopardized by its regional aggressive policies,particularly towards Pakistan and the people of Kashmir. The abrogation of Article 370 and the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019have unveiled the true face of Indian leadership. Furthermore, Prime Minister Imran Khan’s efforts to highlight Indian atrocities in Kashmir and for the right of self-determination of the people of IIOJ&K at the regional and global level have further struck a blow to the soft image of India and shown its cruel ugly face to the world community.

The second possible reason can be attributed to the change in United States’administration. The new Biden administration does not want any kind of Pakistan-India hostility. This is because US considers India as a key player in its “Indo-Pacific” strategy that focuses on the containment of China and reducing its influence in the region. Moreover, the US believes that the two-front confrontation strategy of India would be badly damaging for the country or can even lead to its dismemberment as it does not possess the power and capability to conduct a two-front war. India’s unpreparedness was slammed in the last surgical strikes conducted by the Indian Air Force (IAF) as they not only missed the targets, on thevery next day, two of its jets were downed by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) and a pilot was captured. Considering these ground realities, the United States is also pressurizing India to reduce tension with Pakistan and focus on China.

For the abovestated reasons, India is under pressure both domestically andinternationally to revisit her approach towards Pakistan and to halt human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir. Indians would use these negotiations as a card to derail the negotiation process by taking up issues ofleast importance, diverting attention from the key ones and convincing the international community that they werecommitted to the process. Therefore, Pakistan at this stage should take the lead by raising core issues on the negotiation table and remaining firm on them. Furthermore, the prime focus shouldremain on Kashmir.If this does not happen, then it will alienate the Kashmiri people by making them think that Kashmir is of secondary importance for Pakistan. Besides, other important issues like water, Siachen, and Sir Creek should be resolved and issues like Afghan transit trade, bilateral trade, and people-to-peoplecan be discussed as additional points.

In order to achieve peace in South Asia, it is important that there is peace between these two countries. Pakistan-India relations are complex and there are long-standing issues between the two that need to be resolved in order to normalize ties.However, Pakistan should be cautious this time as the results of all past engagements suggest that India has always tried to hijack the negotiations and blamed Pakistan for their failure on one pretext or another. Pakistan needs to play her cards right and must not let this chapter turn into another diplomatic stunt by India forregional / international marketing.

Zuhaib Anwar is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) and can be reached at cass.thinkers@gmail.com. The article was first published in Pakistan Observer. He can be reached at cass.thinkers@gmail.com

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

3J’s in PAF’s Fighter Fleet: A Lethal Combination

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF), known for its forward-thinking approach, has consistently embraced cutting-edge technologies, boasting a fleet composed of advanced aircraft. Currently, the PAF operates two formidable ‘J series’ fighters: the JF-17 and J-10C, alongside other potent fighters like the US F-16, French Mirage, and Chinese F-7P (originally J-7) aircraft.
  642 views

Read More »

India’s Jingoistic Nationalism

A grand Hindu temple – Ram Mandir – has been inaugurated in the Indian city of Ayodhya. The Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, attended – or led (as he would like history books to remember) – the consecration along with other Bharatiya Janata Party stalwarts, leaders from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and even Modi’s opponents from the Congress.
  674 views

Read More »

Vote for the Future

The 2024 election in Pakistan deserves praise for three reasons: the spirited participation of the people, including women and young voters; the largely secure environment in which voters gathered; and the confirmation of the people’s commitment to a democratic process. What is also worth noting, however, is the technologically primitive nature of the electoral process, as if we were voting in 1924 rather than in 2024.
  434 views

Read More »

Stay Connected

Follow and Subscribe

Join Our Newsletter
And get notified everytime we publish new content.

© 2022 CASSTT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Developed By Team CASSTT

Contact CASS

CASS (Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies), Old Airport Road, Islamabad
+92 51 5405011
cass.thinkers@casstt.com
career@casstt.com

All views and opinions expressed or implied are those of the authors/speakers/internal and external scholars and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of CASS.