PAF_Image

“Superiority in numbers does not decide air battles; better training, morale, and above all, fighting spirit are the deciding factors.”

Air Marshal Nur Khan

The Indo-Pakistan War of 1965 was one of the major tests of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) to defend the country’s airspace against an adversary who was superior quantitatively. It was a test of leadership, professionalism, and spirit, requiring the force to act swiftly and effectively against an act of aggression intended to “capture Lahore and enjoy a cocktail party at the Gymkhana.” The PAF was instrumental in stopping the advance of Indian forces towards Lahore; the tables were turned as fighter pilots of the PAF rewrote history by achieving and maintaining air superiority against the Indian Air Force (IAF), which outnumbered Pakistani fighter jets and had a qualitative edge in the sophistication of aircraft as well.

By confronting the intruders with great valor and professionalism, the PAF officers responded to the call of duty on 6th September by clearing the skies over Pakistan of the IAF fighter jets. The day was marked by the heroic efforts of Squadron Leaders like Sarfaraz Ahmed Rafiqui, who, due to a technical defect causing guns to be jammed, gave protection to his formation by an unarmed aircraft until he embraced martyrdom after being shot down. The courage of officers like Sarfaraz on the first day of the war made an Indian Defense analyst Ravi Rikhye in his book The Psyche of the Pakistan Air Force to remember the 1965 War as “the representation of the zenith of the Pakistan Air Force.”

The aerial warfare after the first day was marked by intense combat with Indian jets attacking the PAF’s central fort in the city of Sargodha. The counterattack from the Pakistani side resulted in heavy losses, which India suffered at the hands of fighter pilots like MM Alam; the Squadron Leader shot five Hunters aircraft in less than one minute – setting a record in the history of air warfare and becoming a ‘flying ace’ (credited with shooting more than four enemy aircraft during an aerial combat). Ground troops enjoyed massive air protection as Pakistani Air warriors demonstrated enormous aerial strength illustrated by statistics as well: the PAF destroyed a far greater number of enemy jets in the aerial combat despite facing a far superior enemy arsenal; the PAF’s full-scale operations on the first two days of war destroyed 50 Indian aircrafts.

The PAF’s unbreakable shield for the country’s airspace is equally attributable to the courageous and wise leadership of Air Marshal Nur Khan and his predecessor Air Marshal Asghar Khan. The latter successfully transformed the PAF into a well-organized professional and devoted force of professionals, ready to undertake the adversary with competence and strength. Asghar Khan’s legacy was furthered by his successor Air Marshal Nur Khan. “Superiority in numbers does not decide air battles; better training, morale, and above all, fighting spirit are the deciding factors,” Nur Khan reminded during a press conference on 4th September (two days prior to the war). He was proven right as he anticipated the war early, marshaled an offensive strategy, and crippled the opponent with his outstanding leadership in tough times.

Moreover, war-fighting abilities were demonstrated with complete efficiency and professionalism in deploying available fighter aircraft in aerial engagements. Sabre jets placed to ward off the Indians were in the lead against the IAF Mystere fighters; Canberra aircraft – a slow and cumbersome bomber force – of the IAF, too, was warded off by the PAF’s night interceptor fleet; and India’s Gnat aircraft fighter (brought to replace Mystere aircraft due to Sabre’s outmaneuvering) was also undermined in aerial combat by Pakistani Starfighter, which flew at twice the speed of sound. The employment of assets during the war was well planned and innovative, thanks to the high standard of leadership and management throughout the war. As Pakistani fighting fleets in air neutralized the enemy’s aerial strength, the PAF performed more than its potential.

Unsurprisingly, the PAF received three Hilal-e-Jurat awards, 45 Sitara-e-Jurat and 05 Tamgha-e-Jurat; making a total of 54 gallantry awards earned during the episode of the 1965 war. Due to the incredible contribution made by the PAF in 1965, it was often said that three As – Allah, Artillery, and the Air Force – saved Pakistan. The country’s air force was able to play such a crucial role in defying the enemy due to its professional excellence, highest traditions of leadership, and matchless commitment to duty. This is why the battle for Pakistan was fought with valor to accomplish the task of protecting airspace against the adversary – the task which was performed by a marvelous blend of strategic clarity, innovative leadership, extraordinary courage, and unbreakable spirit demonstrated in one of the finest hours the PAF had in its history.

Asad Ullah Khan is a senior researcher at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source:  Haider, S. Sajjad. “Straight Shooting on 1965 War.”Dawn. September 6th, 1965


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »