Shaza Arif-Neu-Imp-Tech-Oped thumbnail-April-2024-op 1

The human thinking process is nothing short of a miracle. Our brain houses billions of neurons. Physical and mental activities are conditional upon the generation of electrical impulses which are passed on from one neuron to another. Technological advancements have led to the development of devices with the ability to detect impulses generated in the brain and develop an interface with smart devices. This exciting technological phenomenon is known as the ‘Brain-Computer Interface’ (BCI) – an old technology that has attracted renewed attention, given the ongoing efforts of several startups. A recent prominent initiative in this regard is implants by Neuralink. Following approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last year, the startup founded by tech billionaire Elon Musk has made headlines with its first human implant in January. It has been reported that the individual succeeded in controlling a computer mouse using his thoughts.

The Neuralink implant underpins developing a BCI via installing a small coin-sized wireless device in the skull. By registering human brain activity, the device is used to transmit the information to a computer/smartphone device via Bluetooth connection for the desirable action. Musk has also revealed his plans to commercialise the technology with the initial project tagged as â€˜Telepathy’ to control smart devices solely by thinking.

It has been disclosed that placing the device in the part of the brain that controls motor functions would help people with neurological disorders such as paralysis and epilepsy. Although different startups have already been working on similar projects such as Synchron, which has already implanted its device in ten patients. Expectations, however, seem slightly higher for Neuralink since it uses more than 1000 electrodes (with rival companies using 16), and its ability to target individual neurons which are anticipated to yield better results. 

Interestingly, while most initiatives working on BCI aim to improve/impact the health sector, the broader goal of Neuralink is to augment human intelligence. Moreover, given its association with Elon Musk and his usual style of announcing major projects on X, the experiment has also garnered much more attention than other similar initiatives.

Musk has also claimed that symbiosis of the human brain and computers will help avert a potential  AI apocalypseby ensuring that human cognitive capabilities are at par with emerging technologies. It has also been claimed that one day, this technology will have the potential to control our memories, implying that Neuralink may allow the potential downloading and saving of memories. In fact, Musk has revealed his own plans of getting a brain implant in the future. 

The increasing advancement of BCI can lead to an era unleashing new forms of interaction and communication between humans and smart devices. While the venture looks inspiring, the convenience that technologies such as Neuralink offer certainly comes at a price. Although Musk tweeted that the patient who underwent the implant had shown recovery, adequate details are largely missing to verify these claims, raising concerns regarding safety practices. Additionally, the US FDA inspectors have also flagged concerns about quality controls and unsatisfactory record keeping of the animal experiments at Neuralink’s facilities on calibrations. It is pertinent to mention that previous incidents have been reported where monkeys were subjected to severe brain damage and tortuous death. 

Beyond medical risks, tinkering with nature is also accompanied by significant ethical and privacy considerations – tampering or having direct access to brain activity brings back images of many a Hollywood movie – Inception, Total Recall, Minority Report, Lucy and of course The Matrix. Advancements in such technology also have the potential to create a monopoly of tech giants, accessing our intimate thoughts and even influence them at a later stage.

Risks also include psychological issues. Such developments can fuel digital amnesia, where the tendency of forgetting information is becoming increasingly prevalent owing to over reliance on technology. Moreover, as suggested, if endeavours like Neuralink can alter memory, it can directly impact how humans relate to their past. Hence, this tech is likely to aggravate problems that raise serious concerns regarding human identity. It could alter our understanding of our own self and the world, blurring the notion of reality and technology-fueled perceptions. 

Nevertheless, the race of different startups to make advancements in the BCI sector is in full swing with significant investment (Neuralink, e.g. received USD 363m in funds), suggesting growing interest in the market.

Neuralink and other similar initiatives push us to contemplate the question: What is it like to be human in an era where our thoughts can be interfaced with software? As we continue to witness the increasing penetration of technology in our lives, our interactions are both astounding and worrying at the same time. Seamless interface of the human brain with computers opens new avenues, yet they are redefining the role of technology in our daily lives making human-integration technology increasingly complex. As the convergence of human beings with technology continues at a rapid pace, we must ensure that the journey continues to create meaningful experiences without compromising the core values of human identity and history. 

Shaza Arif is a Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad. The article was first published in Stratheia. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »