Khansa Qureshi-Coming Wave-11 Dec 2023

Mustafa Suleyman with Michael Bhaskar, The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the 21st Century’s Greatest Dilemma (New York: Crown, 2023)

Reviewed by Khansa Qureshi

In the book The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the 21st Century’s Greatest Dilemma, authored by Mustafa Suleyman with Michael Bhaskar, the authors argue that humans as a species are approaching a critical threshold in history where everything is about to change. In the introductory chapters, they set out by analysing the historical technological waves, their contexts, and how they impacted the human civilisation over the epochs. Both are of the view that these technological waves have played a significant role in shaping human history, from ancient flood myths to the rise and fall of empires, extending to their widespread use in everyday life.

More specifically, this joint work explores a new, upcoming technological wave, with AI and synthetic biology as the defining systems that hold massive potential for wealth creation and global development but also pose immense challenges to the humankind that could be impossible to contain (p.21). The duo warns that in this coming wave, our species will be confronted with questions about genome editing, disease immunities, superintelligence, and mortality, especially in relation to our position at the top of the evolutionary pyramid compared to AI systems potentially becoming smarter and more capable than us. They examine how, in this new wave, what they term ‘homo technologicus’ – the human species – faces the challenge of containing the unleashed power of technology. This challenge, as they note, is a significant departure from the historical focus on creating and harnessing technological power (p. 61).

As a high-tech insider at the forefront of major AI developments, Suleyman’s work in particular, has remained partly positive and partly foreboding, discussing the vast possibilities offered by these technologies. Simultaneously, he has been cautioning about the risks they pose to fundamental global governance structures, noting the aloofness of many governments to this looming threat. Hence, one of the key challenges that the book discusses are the implications of the technological advancements on the nation-state and governance. It draws attention to the declining trust in national governments and institutions, exacerbating the challenge of managing and containing technology (p. 173). The authors contend that with the acceleration of technological developments, it becomes crucial to strengthen nation-states and enhance their institutional integrity.

Suleyman and Bhaskar also maintain that newly invented technologies typically become more affordable and accessible over time, fuelling a cycle of continuous innovation. In the book, they also explore historical resistance to technological advancements, citing examples like the banning of the printing press in the Ottoman Empire (p. 52) and the Luddites’ destruction of industrial machinery (p. 305). They also note the eventual, inevitable spread of these technologies. They describe the tendency of technologies to disseminate broadly in waves, with unpredictable and often uncontrollable emergent impacts, including negative and unforeseen consequences, as a significantly magnified ‘containment problem’ (p. 129). Drawing parallels with phrases from the Cold War era, the book cautions against a form of technological expansionism akin to the spread of communism (p. 50). Unlike communism, however, these technologies won’t be imposed on humanity; instead, they will be willingly adopted due to their potential to address critical global challenges, such as climate change, resource scarcity, world hunger, and incurable diseases. This voluntary adoption, the authors note, presents a unique ‘containment problem,’ as the emergence of these technologies is unprecedented in scale and complexity (pp. 129, 132). Consequently, they emphasise that maintaining control over these potent technologies represents one of the most crucial challenges of our era.

Suleyman and Bhaskar assert that humanity has only a limited window to act decisively before losing control over emerging technologies. They acknowledge that while regulation might seem an attractive solution, a deeper examination reveals significant shortcomings in this approach (p. 246). The lack of clear answers for containing these technologies often leads to a sense of despair, causing people to shy away from these issues. This tendency, which they label the ‘pessimism aversion trap,’ is something they caution against (p. 168). Instead, they propose a comprehensive ten-step containment strategy. This strategy includes regulation, improved technical safety, new governance and ownership models, and enhanced accountability and transparency, all crucial yet not solely sufficient, steps towards safer technology. They describe this multifaceted approach as a comprehensive framework that combines advanced engineering, ethical considerations, and government regulation (p. 50).

Even though Suleyman and Bhaskar’s ten-part containment proposal is thorough, its effectiveness hinges on implementation, a challenge the authors acknowledge. The solution proposed or any other regulation or containment mechanism is then the Gordian Knot of the ‘coming wave.’ For this reason, their forward has been termed as a ‘utopian dream’, and not the panacea for the many challenges associated with the wave defined by AI and synthetic biology.

Nonetheless, the book serves as a wake-up call, urging humanity to avoid sleepwalking into self-annihilation. Despite its disturbing undertones, it is an essential guide for understanding the imminent technological revolution and the world it is creating. It is especially relevant for policymakers worldwide, offering insights into the challenges to global politics arising from technological advancements.

Khansa Qureshi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »