4. Saba Abbasi-Mod-Mat-Hind-Gent-Oped thumbnail-November-2025-PUB-APP

“Operation Sindoor on the games field. Outcome is the same – India Wins.”

These were the words of the Prime Minister of supposedly one of the world’s largest democracies on his X account, reflecting the mindset of the nation-state’s leadership. This statement by Narendra Modi came after the first Pakistan-India cricket match at the Asia Cup, which drew considerable attention due to the Indian team captain’s refusal to shake hands with his Pakistani counterpart. This was not an isolated incident, as similar lapses in professional decorum by the Indian cricket team (both men’s and women’s) were observed in all the succeeding matches during Asia Cup 2025. Furthermore, the Indian team even refused to accept the trophy because it was to be presented by Pakistan’s Interior Minister.

Cricket is known as a gentleman’s game, where sportsmanship and respect are considered as vital as victory itself. Players, even in competition, are expected to display grace, honour, and mutual respect. However, for the Indian leadership, politicising sports and undermining the spirit of sportsmanship seem to have become part of the winning strategy.

In the past, cricket diplomacy has been an integral part of Pakistan and India relationship. It can be traced back to 1987, when General Zia-ul-Haq travelled to India to watch an India-Pakistan match during heightened tensions over Kashmir. Later, despite strained political relations, the Indian team visited Pakistan in 2004. The tour was dubbed as cricket diplomacy, with then President Musharraf praising the Indian team and later attending a cricket match in India himself. Even after the Mumbai attacks, both teams overcame the major setback in political relationship and played again in the ICC World Cup of 2011. Manmohan Singh, then-Prime minister of India, invited his Pakistani counterpart, Yousaf Raza Gilani, to watch the match together. Internationally, their joint attendance was hailed as a symbol of restraint and dialogue through sport.

However, Asia’s cup handshake snub has dealt a blow to cricket diplomacy and signalled a tense moment in the India-Pakistan relationship. The reason is that India’s hardline ideology has seeped into non-military domains like sports, which explains why the handshake episode was not condemned at home. The Indian government remained silent, and many citizens openly applauded the move. The BJP government steps to influence and radicalise masses against Pakistan seem to be successful which now further narrows the prospects of normalisation between the two states.

It is evident that the nature of leadership dictates and reflects a nation’s behaviour. Modi’s Hindutva ideology has started to perpetuate anti-Muslim sentiment, intolerance, and polarisation even in all arenas including sports. The hysteria in India has reached such extremes that protests broke out ahead of the Asia Cup match, and a faction of Indian students even filed a petition claiming that playing against Pakistan was against national interest.

A major reason for this incident is that Hindutva ideology has been badly bruised after the historic 7–nil defeat of the May 2025 Indo-Pak military standoff. The Indian masses, despite their leadership’s elevated rhetoric, have not come to terms with what transpired during those four days of conflict. For Pakistan, 7–nil stands as a remarkable milestone and symbol of national pride, while for India it remains one of the greatest military embarrassments in its history.

The crux of the reason why Indian team did not end things on a professional and an honourable note is that they mirrored their vengeful leadership and were seeking to settle military scores beyond the battlefield. On the other hand, the reality of the matter is that even if Modi continues to feed into India’s collective delusion of Operation Sindoor’s success and equating cricket victories with military successes, the on-ground facts will not change, that is: although the Indian cricket team managed to secure runs, the Indian Air Force could not secure its Rafales.

However, in contrast Pakistan has repeatedly demonstrated maturity and strategic patience in both military and non-military domains. It remains open to dialogue and peaceful resolution of bilateral issues, however constructive engagement requires reciprocity. Until and unless India forgoes its extremist and embittered posture, all channels of diplomacy will continue to suffer. If such patterns continue then the spirit of sportsmanship, once a bridge between the two nations may become another casualty of politics, leaving future opportunities for reconciliation increasingly distant and dim.

Saba Abbasi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The West: The History of an Idea

The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.

Read More »

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »